Neelim للاستشارات الصحية
Neelim
Specialist & consultant · oral assessment

Specialist & Consultant Plastic Surgery oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Skin Cancer and Melanoma

A 52-year-old expatriate teacher in Dubai attends your clinic after a dermatologist excised a changing mole on her upper back. Histology shows superficial spreading melanoma, Breslow thickness 2.1 mm, ulcerated, mitotic rate 4 per square millimetre, with a 1 mm deep margin and clear peripheral margins. There are no palpable nodes and she is well. How would you manage her?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing staging, wide local excision margins, the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy and current adjuvant therapy in cutaneous melanoma.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Plastic Surgery oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Plastic Surgery panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Plastic Surgery, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you run a major burn or limb-threatening injury with the right priorities: airway, perfusion, fluid titrated to response and timely cover.
  • •The panel is testing your indications and operative sequence for microsurgical reconstruction and replantation, and how you discuss trade-offs with the patient.
  • •The panel is testing safe practice with breast implants and skin cancer, following current NCCN and AJCC pathways rather than quick fixes.
  • •The panel is testing patient selection and ethics in aesthetic surgery, including body dysmorphic disorder, family or commercial pressure and honest advertising.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Plastic Surgery scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Burns: Acute Resuscitation and Inhalation Injury

An 80 kg, 32-year-old construction worker reaches an Abu Dhabi burns centre 2 hours after a gas cylinder explosion in a closed site cabin. He has deep dermal and full-thickness burns of the face, neck, anterior trunk and both arms, about 40 percent of total body surface area, circumferential on both forearms. He has singed nasal hair, carbonaceous sputum and a hoarse voice. Carboxyhaemoglobin is 18 percent and lactate 5.8 mmol/L, and he has received 1 litre of fluid. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing priorities of airway, resuscitation and limb perfusion in major burns, and fluid management that avoids both under- and over-resuscitation.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is a major flame burn with inhalation injury and carbon monoxide poisoning, with possible cyanide toxicity from an enclosed-space fire. The airway is the first threat: hoarseness and soot predict progressive oedema, so early intubation by an experienced operator is safer than waiting. ABLS recommends starting crystalloid at 2 mL/kg per percent burn over 24 hours in adults, half in the first 8 hours from the time of injury, titrated to urine output of about 0.5 mL/kg/h. Over-resuscitation causes compartment syndromes and pulmonary oedema. Circumferential full-thickness limb burns threaten perfusion and need escharotomy.

Management: I secure the airway early with an uncut tube, give 100 percent oxygen and consider hydroxocobalamin if lactate stays high. I place two large-bore cannulas, through unburned skin if possible, start lactated Ringer's at the calculated rate from the time of injury allowing for fluid already given, and insert a urinary catheter. I adjust the rate hourly to urine output, not the formula, and consider albumin if requirements climb. I perform forearm escharotomies along the mid-medial and mid-lateral lines, extending into the hand if needed, and assess chest compliance for truncal release. I check the corneas, give tetanus prophylaxis, start early enteral feeding and avoid prophylactic antibiotics. Over the next days I plan early excision and grafting with allograft or dermal substitutes, and bronchoscopy for inhalation injury. Follow-up includes scar management, therapy, psychological support and reconstruction.

Ethics and communication: He will lose capacity after intubation, so I explain the plan briefly beforehand where possible and proceed under the emergency exception. As a workplace injury, the employer may call; information is shared only with his consent or as the law requires. Family are given honest survival estimates. Occupational safety reporting follows UAE law and facility policy.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you estimate burn size, and what are the pitfalls of the rule of nines?
  • What is fluid creep and how do you prevent it?
  • How do you diagnose and treat abdominal compartment syndrome in burns?
  • When would you use dermal substitutes or cultured epidermal autograft?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Delaying intubation until stridor develops
  • Calculating fluid from arrival rather than from time of injury
  • Following the formula rigidly instead of urine output
  • Missing circumferential burns that need escharotomy

Reference: ISBI Practice Guidelines for Burn Care, International Society for Burn Injuries, 2016; American Burn Association, Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) Provider Manual

Hand Trauma and Replantation

A 28-year-old right-handed carpenter presents to a Dubai hospital 2 hours after a table saw injury. He has a complete amputation of the left thumb through the proximal phalanx and a partial index finger amputation at the middle phalanx with an intact dorsal skin bridge. The thumb was wrapped in moist gauze in a bag on ice. He smokes 20 cigarettes a day and asks you simply to close the wounds so he can return to work quickly. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing indications for replantation, preservation of the part, operative sequence and an honest discussion of what the patient values.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: The thumb provides about 40 percent of hand function, so thumb amputation is a strong indication for replantation whenever technically possible. Other strong indications are multiple digits, amputation at the palm or wrist, any level in a child, and single digits distal to the flexor digitorum superficialis insertion. A clean saw injury is favourable compared with crush or avulsion, which damage vessels over a long segment. Digits contain little muscle, so they tolerate many hours of cold ischaemia, but far less warm ischaemia. Smoking reduces success, and his occupation and priorities matter, but neither makes replantation contraindicated.

Management: I keep the thumb in moist saline gauze in a sealed bag on ice, never in direct contact with ice, and radiograph the hand and the part. I give tetanus prophylaxis and intravenous antibiotics and assess index finger perfusion. In theatre I tag structures on the part on the back table, then proceed with bone shortening and fixation, tendon repair, arterial anastomosis, nerve repair and venous anastomoses, using vein grafts rather than tension. The index finger is revascularised if needed and repaired. Afterwards I keep him warm, hydrated and pain-free with no smoking, and monitor colour, turgor, capillary refill and temperature hourly. Venous congestion is treated with leeches under antibiotic cover or re-exploration, and arterial insufficiency with early re-exploration. Hand therapy begins within days, and follow-up covers sensation, stiffness and cold intolerance.

Ethics and communication: He has capacity and may choose terminalisation, but only after an informed discussion. I explain that thumb loss permanently reduces function, while replantation means a longer recovery and stopping smoking. Work pressures are real for many expatriate workers, so I offer a letter for his employer containing only what he agrees to. If he declines, I document his reasons and close the stump well.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which amputations would you not replant?
  • How would you manage a ring avulsion injury?
  • What are the options for thumb reconstruction if replantation fails?
  • How do you monitor a replanted digit and when do you re-explore?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Placing the amputated part directly on ice or in water
  • Agreeing to terminalisation without explaining the function of the thumb
  • Repairing vessels under tension instead of using vein grafts
  • Ignoring smoking and vasoconstriction after surgery

Reference: Wolfe et al, Green's Operative Hand Surgery, 8th ed, 2022

Breast Reconstruction and Breast Implant Safety

A 46-year-old woman had bilateral cosmetic breast augmentation with textured implants 9 years ago in another country. She attends your Abu Dhabi clinic with 6 weeks of painless swelling of the right breast. Ultrasound shows a large peri-implant fluid collection on the right without a mass, and the implant shell appears intact. She is afebrile with normal blood tests. She asks you to drain it and exchange the implants for larger ones. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of late seroma as possible breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and adherence to the NCCN diagnostic and surgical pathway.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: A late seroma, arising more than a year after implantation, in a woman with textured implants must be investigated for breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), a T-cell lymphoma strongly linked to textured surfaces. Other causes include infection, trauma, rupture and double capsule. The NCCN pathway requires ultrasound-guided aspiration with cytology, CD30 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, and further imaging if a mass is present. Most patients have disease confined to the fluid and capsule, usually cured by complete surgery. Draining and exchanging the implant without a diagnosis risks leaving disease behind.

Management: Today I examine both breasts and regional nodes and arrange ultrasound-guided aspiration, sending fresh fluid for cytology, CD30 and flow cytometry, plus culture. If BIA-ALCL is confirmed, I arrange PET-CT staging and multidisciplinary review with haematology-oncology. Treatment is total en bloc capsulectomy with implant removal and excision of any mass or involved node, and I discuss contralateral explantation because bilateral disease occurs. I do not place new implants at that operation. Systemic therapy or radiotherapy is reserved for residual or advanced disease. If cytology is negative, I manage the seroma according to its cause. Device details are recorded and reported in line with national requirements, and she is followed with clinical review and imaging.

Ethics and communication: She wants a quick fix, so I explain honestly why diagnosis comes first without causing undue alarm, as the condition is rare and usually curable. I do not criticise the original surgeon. Records from abroad are requested with her consent. Asymptomatic women with textured implants do not need removal, and I say so to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What would you do if the aspirate showed CD30-positive cells but flow cytometry was inconclusive?
  • How would you counsel an asymptomatic woman with textured implants who is worried after a news report?
  • What are the options for breast reconstruction after en bloc capsulectomy?
  • How do you investigate suspected silent implant rupture?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Draining a late seroma without sending fluid for CD30 and flow cytometry
  • Exchanging implants before excluding lymphoma
  • Performing a partial capsulectomy for confirmed disease
  • Recommending removal of textured implants in all asymptomatic women

Reference: Clemens et al, 2019 NCCN Consensus Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma; Neligan, Plastic Surgery, 5th ed, 2023

Lower Limb Trauma and Microsurgical Reconstruction

A 35-year-old motorcyclist in a Dubai trauma centre has an open fracture of the left distal tibia. After debridement by the orthopaedic team there is a 6 by 8 cm soft tissue defect with exposed bone, periosteal stripping and a comminuted fracture in an external fixator. Distal pulses are present and plantar sensation is intact; he is otherwise stable. You are asked to see him on day 5 because the plastic surgeon on call was on leave. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing orthoplastic decision-making for a Gustilo IIIB fracture, timing and choice of soft tissue cover, and accountability for service delays.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is a Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open tibial fracture. It is a high-energy injury with periosteal stripping and a defect needing flap cover, without a vascular injury requiring repair. The BOA and BAPRAS standards call for joint orthoplastic care and definitive fixation with soft tissue cover within 72 hours of injury if not achieved at the first debridement, because infection and non-union rise with delay. Distal third defects are poorly served by local muscle flaps, so a free flap, such as an anterolateral thigh or a gracilis or latissimus dorsi flap, is usually needed. Plantar sensation alone should not drive decisions about amputation.

Management: I see him today, reassess the wound and vascular status, and request CT angiography to identify recipient vessels. I arrange a joint orthoplastic list as soon as possible, ideally within 24 hours, for repeat debridement, definitive fixation and free flap cover in a single session. Until then the wound is kept under a sealed negative pressure or antibiotic-impregnated dressing and antibiotics continue per protocol. I plan the anastomosis outside the zone of injury, end-to-side to preserve distal flow. After surgery the flap is monitored hourly for the first day with early re-exploration for compromise. Rehabilitation includes a dangling protocol, physiotherapy and surveillance of bone healing. I would not place definitive internal fixation without cover in the same session.

Ethics and communication: The delay beyond 72 hours is a system failure that I disclose to him openly and report through the incident system so that orthoplastic cover is fixed. I explain the risks of infection, flap failure, non-union and late amputation in plain language, with a professional interpreter if needed. Insurance or employer issues must not delay care. I document timings and the joint plan.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you choose between a muscle and a fasciocutaneous free flap for the distal leg?
  • What would make you consider primary amputation?
  • How would you manage a free flap that becomes congested at 18 hours?
  • What are the BOA and BAPRAS standards for timing of debridement?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Accepting further delay because the 72-hour window has already passed
  • Internal fixation without same-session soft tissue cover
  • Choosing recipient vessels inside the zone of injury
  • Treating the defect without a joint orthoplastic plan

Reference: BOA and BAPRAS, Standards for the Management of Open Fractures, 2020

Aesthetic Surgery, Patient Selection and Ethics

A 24-year-old woman attends your private clinic in Dubai requesting a third rhinoplasty after two operations abroad in 3 years. She brings edited social media photographs, says her nose ruins her life, avoids university and checks mirrors for hours daily. Her nose is well proportioned with a minor dorsal irregularity. Her mother, who is paying, insists on surgery next week before a family wedding. How would you handle this?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing patient selection in aesthetic surgery, recognition of body dysmorphic disorder, and the ethical limits of commercial and family pressure.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Preoccupation with a minimal defect, hours of mirror checking, social avoidance and repeated surgery strongly suggest body dysmorphic disorder, which is considerably more common among people seeking aesthetic surgery, particularly rhinoplasty, than in the general population. Cosmetic procedures rarely improve the condition and are associated with dissatisfaction, worsening symptoms, demands for further surgery and occasionally hostility toward the surgeon. Validated screening tools, such as the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire, support assessment against DSM-5-TR criteria. Revision rhinoplasty also carries higher technical risk from scarring and cartilage depletion. Deadlines, filtered photographs and third-party pressure are recognised warning signs.

Management: I take a full history, request previous operative records, take standardised photographs and explore her expectations and the effect on her life. I use a validated screening questionnaire and, if positive, explain sensitively that I do not believe surgery will help how she feels and that the condition responds to cognitive behavioural therapy and medication. I offer referral to a psychiatrist or psychologist and, with her consent, contact her family doctor. I would not operate next week or offer fillers as a compromise. I document the consultation and my reasons for declining. I offer review after psychological treatment, when correction of a genuine minor irregularity could be reconsidered if she is well. If she expresses suicidal thoughts, I assess risk and arrange urgent mental health care.

Ethics and communication: She is an adult with capacity, so the decision is hers and not her mother's, and I see her alone for part of the consultation. A surgeon has no duty to perform a procedure unlikely to benefit and likely to harm, and declining is consistent with beneficence and with professional codes such as the ASPS Code of Ethics. The clinic's revenue must not influence the decision. Clinic advertising must avoid misleading before-and-after images.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which features in a consultation make you cautious about aesthetic surgery?
  • How would you respond if she posted a negative review after you declined?
  • What are the ethical rules for advertising aesthetic surgery on social media?
  • How would you manage a dissatisfied patient after a technically good result?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Operating because the patient or family insists and will pay
  • Offering a non-surgical procedure as a compromise
  • Letting the paying parent make the decision
  • Dismissing her distress instead of referring for treatment

Reference: American Society of Plastic Surgeons Code of Ethics; American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), 2022

Craniofacial Surgery and Craniosynostosis

A 4-month-old boy is referred to a paediatric craniofacial clinic in Abu Dhabi with an elongated head noticed since birth. He has a long, narrow skull with frontal bossing, occipital prominence and a palpable ridge over the sagittal suture. Development is normal and there is no papilloedema. Low-dose CT confirms isolated sagittal synostosis. His parents ask whether surgery is only cosmetic and whether a helmet alone will fix it. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing the diagnosis of craniosynostosis, its distinction from positional plagiocephaly, and how you explain age-dependent surgical options and risks to parents.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Sagittal synostosis is the commonest single-suture craniosynostosis and causes scaphocephaly, with growth restricted perpendicular to the fused suture. Positional head shape change has no ridge and responds to repositioning or helmets. Syndromic or multisuture forms need genetic testing because they carry higher risks of raised intracranial pressure and airway and eye problems. In isolated sagittal synostosis, raised pressure affects a minority but is real, so surgery addresses both shape and the risk to development. Early options are endoscopic strip craniectomy with helmet therapy or spring-assisted surgery, while open vault remodelling is done later in infancy. A helmet alone does not correct true synostosis.

Management: I examine for syndromic features and assess the eyes, airway and development. Given his age, I discuss endoscopic strip craniectomy with several months of helmet therapy, spring-assisted surgery, or open vault remodelling later if the parents prefer a single procedure. Pre-operatively I plan with paediatric anaesthesia, check haemoglobin, crossmatch blood and use tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss. Afterwards he is monitored in high dependency for bleeding, hyponatraemia and swelling. Follow-up includes head circumference and shape measurement, fundoscopy or optical coherence tomography for raised pressure, and developmental review through childhood, because pressure can rise after surgery. I would not reassure the parents that this is purely cosmetic or offer a helmet alone.

Ethics and communication: As he is a minor, his parents consent, and they need balanced information on benefits, risks including transfusion, and the uncertain evidence on neurodevelopment. If they decline surgery, I respect the decision while arranging monitoring for raised pressure. Any concerns about blood products are explored early. Photographs for teaching need separate consent.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How does the timing of surgery affect the choice of technique?
  • What features suggest a syndromic craniosynostosis?
  • How do you detect raised intracranial pressure in an infant?
  • How would you manage a dural tear with venous sinus bleeding during vault remodelling?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Confusing synostosis with positional plagiocephaly
  • Calling surgery purely cosmetic
  • Missing syndromic features and genetic referral
  • Stopping follow-up after successful surgery

Reference: Mathijssen et al, Updated Guideline on Treatment and Management of Craniosynostosis, 2021; Neligan, Plastic Surgery, 5th ed, 2023

Common reasons candidates fail the Plastic Surgery oral

  • ✕Delaying intubation in a burn patient with inhalation signs
  • ✕Fluid resuscitation by rigid formula rather than urine output
  • ✕Agreeing to terminalise a thumb without explaining its function
  • ✕Exchanging implants for a late seroma without excluding BIA-ALCL
  • ✕Missing the 72-hour window for cover in an open tibial fracture without disclosure
  • ✕Operating on a patient with probable body dysmorphic disorder under family pressure

Plastic Surgery oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Aesthetic Surgery, Patient Selection and Ethics
  • Body Contouring and Post-Bariatric Surgery
  • Breast Reconstruction and Breast Implant Safety
  • Burn Reconstruction and Scar Management
  • Burns: Acute Resuscitation and Inhalation Injury
  • Cleft Lip and Palate
  • Craniofacial Surgery and Craniosynostosis
  • Facial Trauma and Facial Palsy
  • Hand Infections, Tendon and Nerve Injury
  • Hand Trauma and Replantation
  • Lower Limb Trauma and Microsurgical Reconstruction
  • Medical Tourism, Complications and Patient Safety
  • Pressure Injuries and Complex Wounds
  • Skin Cancer and Melanoma

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Plastic Surgery blueprint too, which covers:

  • Wound Healing, Grafts and Flaps
  • Burns
  • Hand and Upper Limb Surgery
  • Craniofacial and Cleft Surgery
  • Skin Cancer and Head and Neck Reconstruction
  • Breast Surgery
  • Aesthetic Surgery and Non-surgical Procedures
  • Trunk and Lower Limb Reconstruction
  • Patient Safety, Ethics and Perioperative Care

Sitting the written exam as well? Plastic Surgery question bank or the free Plastic Surgery mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Plastic Surgery - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.