Neelim للاستشارات الصحية
Neelim
Consultant title · oral assessment

Consultant Pediatrics oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease

A 3-year-old girl is seen in a Dubai clinic with six days of fever up to 39.8 C despite antibiotics from another clinic. She has bilateral non-exudative conjunctival injection, red cracked lips, a polymorphous rash and swollen red hands, but no lymphadenopathy. CRP is 142 mg/L, ESR 88 mm/h, albumin 28 g/L, ALT 85 U/L and platelets 410 x 10^9/L. Echocardiography shows a left anterior descending coronary artery Z-score of 3.1. What is your assessment and plan?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing recognition of Kawasaki disease, including a presentation that might be dismissed as a viral or drug rash, and timely treatment that limits coronary artery damage.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Pediatrics oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Pediatrics panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Pediatrics, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you can run a time-critical paediatric or neonatal emergency to current thresholds and doses, and escalate before the child deteriorates.
  • •The panel is testing whether you weigh a child's specific risk factors, such as haemolysis, sickle cell disease or a metabolic disorder, when applying a general guideline.
  • •The panel is testing whether you can lead an honest, compassionate conversation about prognosis and limiting treatment within UAE law, facility policy and the family's values.
  • •The panel is testing whether you meet your legal duties, such as notifying communicable diseases and reporting suspected abuse, while keeping the family's trust.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Pediatrics scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders

A 9-year-old girl weighing 28 kg presents in Dubai with three weeks of thirst and weight loss and a day of vomiting and abdominal pain. She is drowsy but rousable, GCS 14, heart rate 128, blood pressure 108/66, with deep sighing respiration. Glucose is 31 mmol/L, venous pH 7.04, bicarbonate 5 mmol/L, beta-hydroxybutyrate 6.8 mmol/L, sodium 131 mmol/L and potassium 5.4 mmol/L. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing safe, protocol-based management of severe paediatric diabetic ketoacidosis, and early recognition and treatment of cerebral injury, its most feared complication.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is severe diabetic ketoacidosis at the presentation of type 1 diabetes; ISPAD 2022 grades pH below 7.1 or bicarbonate below 5 mmol/L as severe. Her reduced GCS already signals risk of cerebral injury, commoner with severe acidosis, high urea and new-onset disease. Total body potassium is depleted despite a normal serum value and will fall once insulin starts. Measured sodium is low because of hyperglycaemia, and a corrected sodium that falls during treatment is a warning sign. The PECARN FLUID trial found that rehydration rate within the studied range did not change neurological outcome. Abdominal pain usually reflects ketosis, but I would keep sepsis and a surgical cause in mind.

Management: In a high-dependency setting she needs hourly glucose and neurological observations and two-hourly gas and electrolytes. She receives a 10 mL/kg 0.9% saline bolus over 20 to 30 minutes, then deficit and maintenance replacement over 24 to 48 hours with an isotonic fluid containing potassium once urine output and potassium are confirmed. Intravenous insulin at 0.05 to 0.1 units/kg/h starts about an hour after fluids, with no bolus. Dextrose is added when glucose falls to about 14 to 17 mmol/L, and insulin continues until ketosis resolves. Bicarbonate is not given. If she develops headache, falling GCS, bradycardia with hypertension or new neurological signs, I would give mannitol 0.5 to 1 g/kg or 3% saline at once, reduce fluid rate and call intensive care, imaging only after treatment. Subcutaneous insulin and diabetes education follow.

Ethics and communication: Consent comes from her guardian, but emergency treatment is not delayed. I would explain the lifelong diagnosis honestly and correct beliefs that sweets caused it or that traditional remedies can cure it. If earlier presentations were missed, I would review them through governance without blame. Questions about fasting in Ramadan deserve a structured plan with the diabetes team rather than a blanket answer.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you calculate corrected sodium, and why does it matter?
  • Two hours into treatment she complains of headache and her heart rate falls to 70. What do you do?
  • When would you consider bicarbonate?
  • What does the PECARN FLUID trial tell us?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Giving an insulin bolus or starting insulin before fluids
  • Stopping insulin when glucose normalises instead of adding dextrose
  • Delaying mannitol or hypertonic saline to obtain a CT scan
  • Forgetting potassium replacement once insulin is running

Reference: Glaser N et al, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state, Pediatric Diabetes, 2022; Kuppermann N et al, Clinical Trial of Fluid Infusion Rates for Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID), New England Journal of Medicine, 2018

Neonatal Medicine and Preterm Care

A 3-day-old boy born at 37 weeks and exclusively breastfed is brought back to a Sharjah hospital because he is yellow, sleepy and feeding poorly. He weighs 2.85 kg, 11% below birth weight. Total serum bilirubin is 380 micromol/L (22.2 mg/dL), conjugated 12 micromol/L, haemoglobin 128 g/L and reticulocytes 6%. His mother is O positive, the direct antiglobulin test is negative, and his older brother has G6PD deficiency. How do you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you recognise hazardous hyperbilirubinaemia with haemolysis, apply current thresholds that account for neurotoxicity risk, and act before kernicterus occurs.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is severe unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in a 37-week infant with probable haemolysis, most likely G6PD deficiency, which is common in the Gulf. The AAP 2022 guideline sets phototherapy and exchange thresholds by gestational age, age in hours and neurotoxicity risk factors, which include G6PD deficiency or other haemolysis, so his thresholds are lower. His bilirubin is at or above the escalation-of-care level, which is 2 mg/dL below the exchange threshold. Sleepiness and poor feeding may be early acute bilirubin encephalopathy. A G6PD assay can be falsely normal during acute haemolysis, when young red cells predominate.

Management: This is an emergency managed in the neonatal unit. I would start intensive phototherapy at once with maximal skin exposure, correct dehydration with intravenous fluids or supplemental milk, and recheck bilirubin within two hours. Because he has reached escalation of care, I would cross-match blood and prepare for exchange transfusion now, with an experienced team and the parents informed. If bilirubin reaches the exchange threshold, or he shows hypertonia, retrocollis, opisthotonos or a high-pitched cry, I would proceed to exchange without delay, even if the bilirubin is falling. I would not subtract the conjugated fraction. I would send a blood film, albumin and quantitative G6PD, repeating the assay later if normal. Before discharge he needs an automated auditory brainstem response hearing test, follow-up of bilirubin and development, and written advice to avoid fava beans, naphthalene mothballs and oxidant drugs.

Ethics and communication: Consent for exchange comes from his guardian after a clear explanation of risks and benefits. If he was discharged without a bilirubin check or follow-up plan, I would review this through governance and disclose honestly if care fell short. I would explain that G6PD deficiency is inherited without implying blame on the mother, and offer testing to siblings. Genetic information is shared only with the family's consent.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which neurotoxicity risk factors lower the thresholds in the AAP 2022 guideline?
  • What are the complications of exchange transfusion?
  • Would intravenous immunoglobulin help here?
  • What are the signs of acute bilirubin encephalopathy?
  • Why might the G6PD screen be normal today?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Using thresholds for a term infant without risk factors
  • Waiting for the next bilirubin result before preparing for exchange
  • Ignoring neurological signs because the bilirubin is falling
  • Discharging without hearing screening and avoidance advice

Reference: Kemper AR et al, Clinical Practice Guideline Revision: Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation, Pediatrics, 2022

Genetics, Consanguinity and Inborn Errors of Metabolism

A term girl born to first-cousin parents in Al Ain stopped feeding and became sleepy on day 3. She is now lethargic and hypotonic with occasional apnoeas, respiratory rate 70 and heart rate 150. Blood gas shows pH 7.49 and pCO2 3.6 kPa, glucose 4.2 mmol/L and lactate 2.1 mmol/L. Plasma ammonia is 640 micromol/L. A previous son died at one week of age with a diagnosis of sepsis. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you treat neonatal hyperammonaemia as a time-critical emergency, take the right diagnostic samples, and escalate early to extracorporeal detoxification.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Ammonia of 640 micromol/L in a newborn with respiratory alkalosis, no acidosis and normal glucose points to a urea cycle disorder, and consanguinity and a sibling death raise the likelihood of an autosomal recessive condition. Organic acidaemias usually cause metabolic acidosis, and sepsis and liver failure must be excluded. Ammonia is directly neurotoxic, and the peak level and duration of coma largely determine outcome, so every hour counts. Diagnostic samples should be taken before treatment changes them: plasma amino acids, acylcarnitines, urine organic acids and orotic acid. The revised urea cycle disorder guideline supports early extracorporeal detoxification for severe neonatal hyperammonaemia alongside drug therapy.

Management: I would stop all protein, give high-glucose intravenous fluid at about 8 to 10 mg/kg/min with insulin if hyperglycaemia develops, and add lipid once a fatty acid oxidation defect is unlikely, to reverse catabolism. With the metabolic team I would start intravenous sodium benzoate, sodium phenylacetate and arginine at protocol doses. With this ammonia and encephalopathy, I would arrange urgent transfer to a unit able to provide haemodialysis or continuous kidney replacement therapy, not wait to see whether drugs work. Ammonia is rechecked every three to four hours on free-flowing samples sent on ice. She is ventilated if apnoeas worsen, and I would avoid valproate and steroids. Protein is reintroduced within 24 to 48 hours under dietetic guidance. Long-term care includes diet, scavengers, an emergency letter and, for severe types, liver transplantation.

Ethics and communication: The son's death may have been the same condition, and I would explain this honestly and gently, without blaming consanguinity. Consent for dialysis and central access comes from her guardian. I would offer genetic counselling, testing and future reproductive options in line with UAE law. Results belong to the parents, so I would not share them with the wider family without consent, while encouraging cascade testing.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why does respiratory alkalosis help distinguish a urea cycle disorder from an organic acidaemia?
  • Which samples must be taken before treatment, and how is ammonia collected?
  • When would you start dialysis rather than drug therapy alone?
  • How would you counsel the parents about future pregnancies?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Treating as sepsis alone and not measuring ammonia
  • Continuing milk feeds while awaiting results
  • Delaying transfer for dialysis to see the effect of scavengers
  • Giving too little glucose to stop catabolism

Reference: Haberle J et al, Suggested guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urea cycle disorders: first revision, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 2019

Haematology and Oncology

A 7-year-old boy with sickle cell anaemia (HbSS) weighing 22 kg was admitted to a Fujairah hospital two days ago with a painful crisis in his legs, treated with morphine. Today he has fever 38.9 C, chest pain, respiratory rate 40 and oxygen saturation 89% in air. Chest radiograph shows new right lower lobe consolidation. Haemoglobin has fallen from his baseline of 82 g/L to 64 g/L and platelets to 140 x 10^9/L. He takes hydroxyurea irregularly. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of acute chest syndrome as a life-threatening complication, the place of simple and exchange transfusion, and attention to prevention after recovery.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is acute chest syndrome: a new pulmonary infiltrate with fever, chest pain or respiratory signs in sickle cell disease, and a leading cause of death in the condition. It often follows a vaso-occlusive crisis, and opioid-induced hypoventilation, splinting from pain and fluid overload contribute. Causes include infection with atypical organisms or Streptococcus pneumoniae, fat embolism from bone marrow infarction and in-situ sickling. Hypoxaemia, a falling haemoglobin and falling platelets indicate severe disease. Splenic sequestration should be excluded. Transfusion improves oxygenation, and severe or progressive disease needs exchange transfusion.

Management: I would give oxygen to correct hypoxaemia, encourage incentive spirometry, titrate analgesia carefully, and start intravenous antibiotics covering pneumococcus and atypical organisms, such as ceftriaxone with a macrolide. Fluids are limited to maintenance to avoid pulmonary oedema. I would cross-match phenotype-matched, sickle-negative blood and give a simple transfusion, keeping the haemoglobin no higher than about 100 g/L to avoid hyperviscosity. If he worsens despite this or his oxygen requirement rises, I would arrange exchange transfusion with haematology and involve intensive care early, as respiratory support may be needed. I would monitor blood count, reticulocytes, liver function and gases, and check the spleen and liver for sequestration. After recovery I would address hydroxyurea adherence, penicillin prophylaxis and vaccines, check that transcranial Doppler screening is current, and consider chronic transfusion if acute chest syndrome recurs on hydroxyurea.

Ethics and communication: Consent for transfusion comes from his guardian, with an honest explanation of risks including alloimmunisation. Irregular hydroxyurea use calls for an open, non-judgemental conversation about side effects, beliefs and access, not blame. If morphine was given without respiratory monitoring, I would raise it as a learning point through governance. At a calmer time I would discuss curative options such as stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What are the indications for exchange rather than simple transfusion?
  • Why must the post-transfusion haemoglobin be limited?
  • How does hydroxyurea work, and what monitoring does it need?
  • How would you distinguish acute chest syndrome from pneumonia?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Treating it as simple pneumonia and not transfusing a hypoxic child
  • Transfusing to a high haemoglobin and causing hyperviscosity
  • Giving aggressive intravenous fluids that worsen lung injury
  • Under-treating pain so the child splints and hypoventilates

Reference: Howard J et al, Guideline on the management of acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease, British Journal of Haematology, 2015; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Evidence-Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report, 2014

End-of-Life Care and Withdrawal of Treatment

A term baby girl in an Abu Dhabi neonatal unit was born after a uterine rupture, with Apgar scores of 0, 1 and 3 and a cord pH of 6.78. She completed 72 hours of therapeutic hypothermia. On day 6 she remains ventilated with only occasional gasps, absent suck and gag, and a suppressed EEG background. MRI shows extensive injury to the basal ganglia, thalami and cortex. Her parents, who waited eight years for her, ask for everything. How would you approach this?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you can establish prognosis rigorously, lead a compassionate conversation about limiting treatment, and act within UAE law, facility policy and the family's values.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy after therapeutic hypothermia, and a persistently suppressed EEG, absent brainstem reflexes apart from gasps and extensive basal ganglia, thalamic and cortical injury together predict death or profound disability with high confidence. Prognosis should rest on several concordant findings after rewarming, with sedation excluded. Survival would likely mean severe cerebral palsy, feeding dependence and epilepsy. International frameworks, such as the RCPCH framework, accept that limiting life-sustaining treatment may be in a child's best interests when it imposes burdens without reasonable benefit. Active ending of life is never permissible. In the UAE, decisions such as not to resuscitate must follow the conditions set by law and facility policy.

Management: First I would confirm the findings with specialists and a second consultant. I would then meet both parents in a quiet room with their nurse and, if they wish, a relative or religious adviser. I would explain in plain words what the tests show and what her future would likely be, and ask what they understand and hope for. Rather than asking them to decide alone, I would make a clear recommendation, for example not to escalate treatment or perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation, while continuing comfort and dignity. Where time allows, decisions are reached over more than one meeting and carefully documented, with ethics committee involvement if we cannot agree. Comfort care, holding, privacy and bereavement support follow.

Ethics and communication: The guiding principle is the baby's best interests, interpreted with respect for the family's faith and values. I would avoid false hope and euphemism, and give time, not pressure. The uterine rupture must be reviewed through the incident process and disclosed to the parents honestly. Consent and every discussion should be recorded in line with UAE law and facility policy.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which findings would make you less certain of the prognosis?
  • The father says only God decides when she dies. How do you respond?
  • What would you do if the parents asked for a tracheostomy and home ventilation?
  • Who should be present at the family meeting, and why?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Giving prognosis before confirming it with multiple concordant tests
  • Asking the parents to carry the decision alone
  • Using vague language that the parents cannot understand
  • Acting outside UAE law and facility policy on resuscitation decisions

Reference: Larcher V et al, Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2015; Federal Decree-Law No. 4 of 2016 on Medical Liability and Cabinet Resolution No. 40 of 2019 (UAE)

Infectious Diseases and Sepsis

A 2-year-old boy weighing 12 kg is brought to a Ras Al Khaimah emergency department with eight hours of fever and lethargy. He has a spreading non-blanching rash on the legs and trunk, heart rate 176, capillary refill 5 seconds, cool peripheries, blood pressure 82/40 and GCS 13. Glucose is 3.1 mmol/L, lactate 6.2 mmol/L and platelets 62 x 10^9/L. His vaccinations are incomplete. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing time-critical resuscitation of paediatric septic shock, the decision not to perform a lumbar puncture, and the public health duty that follows.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Fever with a spreading non-blanching rash and shock is meningococcal septicaemia until proven otherwise, although pneumococcal, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Gram-negative sepsis can look similar. Tachycardia, slow capillary refill and cold extremities precede hypotension, which in a child is a late, pre-terminal sign. Hypoglycaemia, a high lactate and thrombocytopenia indicate severe disease with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Death usually comes from refractory shock, myocardial dysfunction or raised intracranial pressure. Lumbar puncture is contraindicated while he is shocked, coagulopathic or has a reduced conscious level. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign paediatric guidance supports fluid boluses with frequent reassessment and early vasoactive drugs where intensive care is available.

Management: I would call the senior team and paediatric intensive care, give high-flow oxygen, obtain intravenous or intraosseous access within minutes, take blood cultures and meningococcal PCR, and give intravenous ceftriaxone 80 mg/kg without waiting for results. I would give 10 to 20 mL/kg boluses of balanced crystalloid, reassessing after each for response and overload, and correct glucose with 2 mL/kg of 10% dextrose. After 40 to 60 mL/kg, or sooner if he worsens, I would start adrenaline peripherally while central access is planned. Intubation is by an experienced team with a cardiostable induction, since it can precipitate arrest. Corticosteroids are considered for catecholamine-resistant shock. I would check calcium, potassium and coagulation, correcting coagulopathy if he bleeds, and defer lumbar puncture. Once stabilised he is transferred to intensive care, and public health is notified so close contacts receive chemoprophylaxis.

Ethics and communication: Consent is from his guardian, but treatment cannot wait. Meningococcal disease must be notified under Federal Law No. 14 of 2014, which is a legal duty rather than a breach of confidentiality. I would counsel the parents honestly about the risk of death, scarring and limb loss. The missed vaccinations should be explored without blame and catch-up offered to him and his siblings.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why is a lumbar puncture unsafe now, and when would you do one?
  • He remains hypotensive after 60 mL/kg. What next?
  • Which contacts need chemoprophylaxis, and with what?
  • What are the risks of intubating this child, and how do you reduce them?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Delaying antibiotics for blood tests or a lumbar puncture
  • Waiting for hypotension before treating shock
  • Missing or under-treating hypoglycaemia
  • Forgetting to notify public health and protect contacts

Reference: Weiss SL et al, Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2020; NICE guideline NG240, Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management, 2024; Federal Law No. 14 of 2014 on the Prevention of Communicable Diseases (UAE)

Common reasons candidates fail the Pediatrics oral

  • ✕Waiting for hypotension before recognising shock in a child
  • ✕Giving an insulin bolus or excessive fluids without monitoring for cerebral oedema in DKA
  • ✕Measuring bilirubin or ammonia late, or ignoring neurological signs
  • ✕Treating a sick neonate as sepsis alone without considering metabolic or surgical causes
  • ✕Asking parents to make an end-of-life decision alone, or giving a prognosis without evidence
  • ✕Forgetting notification, safeguarding or follow-up duties once the child is stable

Pediatrics oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease
  • Child Protection and Safeguarding
  • Consent, Confidentiality and Adolescent Health
  • End-of-Life Care and Withdrawal of Treatment
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
  • Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
  • Genetics, Consanguinity and Inborn Errors of Metabolism
  • Haematology and Oncology
  • Infectious Diseases and Sepsis
  • Neonatal Medicine and Preterm Care
  • Neonatal Resuscitation and Stabilisation
  • Nephrology and Fluid Balance
  • Neurology, Seizures and Neurodevelopment
  • Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Pediatrics blueprint too, which covers:

  • Growth, Development, Adolescent Medicine & Behavioral Pediatrics
  • Neonatology & Perinatal Medicine (NICU)
  • Acute Care, Pediatric Emergency & Critical Care (PICU)
  • Infectious Diseases, Immunology & Allergy
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
  • Endocrinology, Metabolic Disease & Genetics
  • Hematology & Oncology
  • Nephrology, Urology, Fluids & Electrolytes
  • Neurology & Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Musculoskeletal, Rheumatology, Dermatology & ENT/Eye
  • Professionalism, Ethics, Patient Safety, Preventive & Community Pediatrics

Sitting the written exam as well? Pediatrics question bank or the free Pediatrics mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Pediatrics - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.