Neelim للاستشارات الصحية
Neelim
Specialist & consultant · oral assessment

Specialist & Consultant Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Brain Injury Rehabilitation

A 23-year-old man is transferred to your rehabilitation unit five weeks after a severe traumatic brain injury from a road traffic collision. He is awake but disoriented, pulls at his gastrostomy tube, shouts and tries to climb out of bed, especially at night. The ward team has given haloperidol and lorazepam several times. His Westmead Post-Traumatic Amnesia Scale scores remain low. His mother asks why he is not the same person. What is your assessment and approach?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing understanding of post-traumatic amnesia and agitation after brain injury, a non-drug-first approach, and evidence-based use of medication.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you recognise rehabilitation emergencies such as autonomic dysreflexia or baclofen withdrawal and act in the right order.
  • •The panel is testing whether you can localise a neurological lesion clinically and design an electrodiagnostic study that answers the clinical question.
  • •The panel is testing whether you set realistic, shared goals with an interdisciplinary team and communicate prognosis honestly to patients and families.
  • •The panel is testing whether you write objective medicolegal and impairment reports, resist pressure from any party, and handle system failures with open disclosure.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

A 32-year-old man with a complete T4 spinal cord injury (AIS A) from a road traffic collision eight weeks ago is on your Dubai rehabilitation unit. During physiotherapy he develops a pounding headache and facial flushing. Blood pressure is 210/112 mmHg against his usual 100/60, heart rate 48, and he is sweating above the level of injury. His last bladder catheterisation was six hours ago. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing immediate recognition and stepwise treatment of autonomic dysreflexia, and the prevention and education that should follow.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is autonomic dysreflexia, a medical emergency in people with spinal cord injury at or above T6. A noxious stimulus below the injury triggers unopposed sympathetic vasoconstriction, while baroreceptor-driven vagal activity causes bradycardia and flushing above the level. His baseline is low, so a rise of 20 mmHg or more is significant, and his current pressure risks intracranial haemorrhage, seizures, arrhythmia and death. Bladder distension is the commonest cause, then bowel distension, pressure injuries, ingrown toenails, tight clothing and fractures. The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine guideline sets a sequence: sit up, loosen clothing, find and remove the cause, then give a rapid-onset, short-acting antihypertensive if pressure stays high.

Management: I would sit him upright with legs lowered, loosen clothing, binders and leg bag straps, and check blood pressure every two to five minutes. I would catheterise him at once with lidocaine gel, or check and flush an existing catheter. If pressure stays high after drainage, I would check the rectum for faeces using lidocaine gel and examine the skin and limbs for other triggers. If systolic pressure remains markedly raised, I would give a rapid-onset, short-acting agent such as topical glyceryl trinitrate, after excluding recent phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use, or another agent per local protocol, watching for hypotension. If it persists, I would monitor him closely and look for hidden causes such as infection, stones, fractures or an acute abdomen. Monitoring continues for at least two hours after resolution. Afterwards I would review his bladder, bowel and skin programmes and give him a wallet card.

Ethics and communication: He and his family need education so that he can direct his own care, including in hospitals unfamiliar with the condition. A missed catheterisation is a care failure, so I would disclose it to him, apologise and report it through the incident system. Respecting his autonomy includes discussing bladder options and sexual health.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why is he bradycardic?
  • Which antihypertensives would you use, and which would you avoid?
  • How does autonomic dysreflexia present in pregnancy or labour?
  • What would you teach him before discharge?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Lying the patient flat or leaving him supine
  • Giving an antihypertensive before looking for and removing the trigger
  • Using glyceryl trinitrate after recent sildenafil
  • Treating it as essential hypertension because the cause is not obvious

Reference: Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, Evaluation and Management of Autonomic Dysreflexia and Other Autonomic Dysfunctions: Preventing the Highs and Lows, Paralyzed Veterans of America, 2020; Cifu DX, Braddom's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (6th ed)

Stroke Rehabilitation

A 62-year-old right-handed man is transferred to your Abu Dhabi rehabilitation unit 10 days after a left middle cerebral artery infarct. He has dense right hemiparesis, expressive aphasia, a wet voice after drinks, a temperature of 37.9 C and crackles at the right base. His right shoulder is painful and subluxed by one fingerbreadth. He has been on bed rest with a catheter. His family ask when he will walk. How would you plan his rehabilitation?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you identify and correct complications from the acute phase, organise interdisciplinary rehabilitation on current evidence, and communicate prognosis honestly.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: He has a severe left hemispheric stroke with probable aspiration pneumonia from unrecognised dysphagia, a hemiplegic shoulder and complications of immobility. Silent aspiration is common, so a wet voice calls for instrumental swallow assessment. The AHA/ASA guideline recommends organised interdisciplinary rehabilitation, task-specific training and early dysphagia screening. Very early, high-dose mobilisation within 24 hours was harmful in AVERT, but at day 10 he should be mobilising regularly. Intermittent pneumatic compression reduced deep vein thrombosis in immobile stroke patients in CLOTS 3. Hemiplegic shoulder pain relates to subluxation, spasticity, rotator cuff injury and complex regional pain syndrome, and poor handling makes it worse.

Management: First I would treat the chest infection, keep him nil by mouth pending speech and language therapy and instrumental assessment, and feed him by nasogastric tube. I would remove the catheter with bladder scanning, and use intermittent pneumatic compression or pharmacological prophylaxis as appropriate. For the shoulder I would teach safe handling, use positioning and supports, and treat pain, including a suprascapular nerve block if needed. Within days the team would set goals with him and his family: physiotherapy for balance, transfers and gait, occupational therapy for the arm and daily activities, and speech therapy for aphasia with supported communication. I would screen for depression and watch for spasticity. Weekly team meetings review measurable goals, and discharge planning starts early.

Ethics and communication: Aphasia does not mean he lacks capacity, so I would assess capacity for each decision using communication aids and the speech therapist's help. I would tell the family honestly that recovery is uncertain and give a realistic range rather than a date. If the delay in recognising dysphagia caused the pneumonia, I would review it through the incident process and disclose it. Family carers should be trained while his independence is encouraged.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What did AVERT show, and how does it affect your practice?
  • How would you assess and treat hemiplegic shoulder pain?
  • Which factors predict walking recovery after stroke?
  • How would you assess capacity in a patient with expressive aphasia?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Relying on a bedside water swallow screen in a patient with a wet voice
  • Pulling on the hemiplegic arm during transfers
  • Giving the family a fixed date for walking
  • Assuming that a patient with aphasia lacks capacity

Reference: Winstein CJ et al, Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, Stroke, 2016; AVERT Trial Collaboration Group, Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT), Lancet, 2015; CLOTS Trials Collaboration, Effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression in reduction of risk of deep vein thrombosis in patients who have had a stroke (CLOTS 3), Lancet, 2013

Electrodiagnosis and Neuromuscular Disorders

A 48-year-old woman is referred to your electrodiagnostic clinic three weeks after a right total hip arthroplasty. Foot drop was noticed on the first postoperative day. Dorsiflexion is MRC grade 1, eversion grade 3, knee flexion grade 4 and hip abduction normal, with reduced sensation over the foot dorsum and lateral leg and a reduced ankle jerk. The surgeon thinks it is a peroneal palsy from the bandage. How would you approach this?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing clinical localisation, the timing and design of the electrodiagnostic study, and objective reporting when the result has implications for a colleague.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: The weakness extends beyond the common fibular nerve: reduced knee flexion and a depressed ankle jerk point to a sciatic nerve injury affecting mainly the peroneal division, a recognised complication of hip arthroplasty. Normal hip abduction argues against L5 radiculopathy, because gluteus medius is supplied by the superior gluteal nerve, outside the sciatic territory. Fibular head compression and lumbosacral plexopathy from haematoma are the other differentials. At three weeks Wallerian degeneration is complete, so studies can localise the lesion and grade axonal loss through reduced motor amplitudes and fibrillation potentials. The short head of biceps femoris is the only thigh muscle supplied by the peroneal division, so needle examination of it separates a sciatic lesion from a fibular head lesion. Preserved sensory responses would suggest a root lesion instead.

Management: I would study fibular and tibial motor and superficial fibular and sural sensory nerves bilaterally. Needle examination covers tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, gastrocnemius, short head of biceps femoris, gluteus medius and paraspinals. Nerve ultrasound or MRI can show haematoma or entrapment, which needs urgent surgical review. Meanwhile she needs an ankle-foot orthosis, physiotherapy to prevent equinus contracture, neuropathic pain treatment and foot protection. I would repeat the study at about three months to look for reinnervation. If there is no clinical or electrical recovery by three to six months, I would refer to a peripheral nerve surgeon for exploration or tendon transfer.

Ethics and communication: My report must be objective and complete, describing a likely sciatic lesion even if this is uncomfortable for a colleague. I would explain the findings honestly to her, and if she asks whether surgery caused it, I would say it is a recognised complication and encourage her to discuss it with her surgeon. Her report is released to third parties only with her consent or as the law requires.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why wait three weeks before needle EMG?
  • How do you distinguish sciatic neuropathy from L5 radiculopathy?
  • What findings would suggest a good prognosis?
  • What would you do if she had severe buttock pain and a falling haemoglobin?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Accepting the bandage explanation without examining the hamstrings and reflexes
  • Omitting the short head of biceps femoris from the needle study
  • Studying too early and misreading the absence of denervation
  • Softening the report to protect a colleague

Reference: Preston DC, Shapiro BE, Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic-Ultrasound Correlations (4th ed)

Amputation and Prosthetic Rehabilitation

A 64-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 9.1%), kidney failure on haemodialysis and peripheral arterial disease had a right transtibial amputation in Al Ain four weeks ago. The residual limb is bulbous with a 1.5 cm dehiscence at the medial end of the scar, and he has a 15-degree knee flexion contracture. Before surgery he walked indoors with a stick. He has a small ulcer under the left first metatarsal head. How would you assess and plan his rehabilitation?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing realistic goal-setting for a dysvascular amputee, protection of the remaining limb, and prosthetic prescription matched to functional potential.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: The Medicare Functional Classification Levels, K0 to K4, describe ambulatory potential and guide component prescription; previous indoor walking with a stick suggests K1 to K2 potential. A knee flexion contracture threatens fitting, and one beyond about 15 degrees makes a socket and efficient gait difficult. Diabetes, kidney failure and arterial disease impair healing, and the dehiscence must heal before full socket loading. The other foot is at high risk of later amputation. Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain need to be distinguished, and dialysis causes fluctuating limb volume that complicates socket fit.

Management: I would review the wound with the vascular surgeon, optimise glucose control and nutrition, and treat the dehiscence with dressings and off-loading. A rigid removable dressing or shrinker shapes and protects the limb when healing allows, and a pneumatic post-amputation mobility aid can start supervised walking if the wound permits. For the contracture I would use prone lying, stretching, no pillows under the knee and a knee extension board on the wheelchair. The left foot ulcer needs off-loading, podiatry, vascular assessment and daily inspection. I would assess cardiorespiratory fitness, cognition and transfers, then prescribe a prosthesis suited to his K-level, typically a total surface bearing socket with an appropriate suspension and foot, adjusting liners for volume changes around dialysis. Gait training, a wheelchair and home adaptation proceed in parallel, with lifelong follow-up.

Ethics and communication: Shared goal-setting matters: he may hope to walk outdoors, and I would explain what is realistic while respecting his priorities. If insurance limits the prosthesis, I would prescribe on clinical need and support an appeal rather than accept an unsafe component. Driving should be discussed with reference to the licensing authority's rules rather than my own permission. Depression and body image concerns deserve psychological support.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you assign a K-level, and how does it change the prescription?
  • How would you manage phantom limb pain?
  • When is a patient not a candidate for a prosthesis?
  • How does haemodialysis affect socket fit?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Ignoring the contralateral foot while focusing on the prosthesis
  • Casting for a socket before the wound has healed
  • Placing a pillow under the knee and worsening the contracture
  • Prescribing high-activity components without functional potential

Reference: VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation, Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense; Cifu DX, Braddom's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (6th ed)

Disability Assessment, Certification and Medicolegal Practice

A 39-year-old warehouse worker in Dubai injured his lower back lifting a pallet nine months ago. MRI showed an L4-5 disc protrusion without nerve compression, and he has completed physiotherapy. He has localised back pain with full power, normal reflexes and sensation, inconsistent effort on testing and positive Waddell signs. His employer's insurer requests an independent impairment rating. At the end of the consultation he asks you to write that he cannot work at all, because his compensation depends on it and he supports his family abroad. How do you respond?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing honest, standardised impairment assessment, the distinction between impairment and work capacity, and a compassionate but firm response to a request for a false report.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: His picture is non-specific chronic low back pain without radiculopathy. Waddell signs indicate non-organic contributions and distress, not malingering, and must not be used alone to judge honesty. Impairment rating requires maximum medical improvement, which is likely at nine months after adequate treatment, and should use a standardised system such as the AMA Guides, applied as written. Impairment differs from disability or work capacity, which depend on the demands of the job. Yellow flags such as fear-avoidance and financial stress predict prolonged disability, and graded return to modified work usually helps.

Management: At the outset I would explain that I am an independent examiner, not his treating doctor, and the report goes to the insurer. I would take a full history, examine him, review records and imaging, and record findings objectively, without labels. I would rate impairment with the agreed edition of the guide and show my method. For work capacity I would describe specific, time-limited restrictions, such as lifting limits, and recommend a graded return to modified duties with a functional restoration programme rather than total incapacity. I would answer his request kindly but firmly, explaining that I cannot write something untrue, and direct him to his treating doctor, social support and the legal route for disputes. If the process allows, I would explain the report to him.

Ethics and communication: A false report would be dishonest, could expose me to liability under UAE law and undermines trust in medical evidence. I would still acknowledge his pain and financial pressure. His explicit consent to examination and release of the report must be documented, and unrelated personal information left out. If he appears depressed, I would advise him and his treating doctor.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What is the difference between impairment and disability?
  • How should Waddell signs be interpreted?
  • What would you do if the insurer asked you to change your conclusion?
  • When is maximum medical improvement reached?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Writing the report the patient or the payer wants rather than what the evidence shows
  • Labelling the patient a malingerer on the basis of Waddell signs
  • Equating an impairment percentage with inability to work
  • Failing to clarify the independent examiner role and obtain consent

Reference: American Medical Association, AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (6th ed); World Medical Association, International Code of Medical Ethics, 2022; Federal Decree-Law No. 4 of 2016 on Medical Liability and Cabinet Resolution No. 40 of 2019 (UAE)

Spasticity Management

A 27-year-old woman with spastic tetraparesis after an incomplete C5 spinal cord injury has had an intrathecal baclofen pump for three years. She presents to a Sharjah emergency department with 24 hours of increasing spasms, itching, agitation and fever of 39.2 C. Heart rate is 132, blood pressure 98/56 and creatine kinase 4,800 U/L. Her refill appointment two weeks ago was cancelled when the clinic changed staff, and the pump alarm has been sounding. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of intrathecal baclofen withdrawal as a life-threatening emergency, restoration of intrathecal delivery, and open handling of the system failure that caused it.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is acute intrathecal baclofen withdrawal, which can progress to rhabdomyolysis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multi-organ failure and death. Early features are rebound spasticity, pruritus, agitation, tachycardia and blood pressure lability, progressing to high fever, altered consciousness and rigidity. The differential includes sepsis, autonomic dysreflexia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, serotonin syndrome and malignant hyperthermia, and infection may coexist. Causes include an empty reservoir, catheter kink, disconnection or migration, pump failure and programming error. Oral baclofen alone is unreliable because it cannot reproduce intrathecal levels, so restoring intrathecal delivery is the definitive treatment.

Management: I would resuscitate her in a monitored bed, cool her, give fluids for rhabdomyolysis with close monitoring of kidney function and potassium, and take cultures, starting antibiotics if sepsis is possible. I would call the pump-managing physician or on-call neurosurgeon at once to interrogate, refill and check the pump programme. If the catheter may have failed, imaging and a temporary intrathecal bolus by lumbar puncture or external catheter may be needed. Meanwhile, high-dose enteral baclofen and benzodiazepines such as diazepam reduce spasms, and cyproheptadine is a recognised adjunct. If she deteriorates, she needs intensive care, sedation, ventilation and possibly dialysis. Before discharge, the whole system is checked and the refill schedule confirmed.

Ethics and communication: The missed refill is a system failure that harmed her. I would disclose it to her honestly with an apology, report it through the incident system and ensure the review covers refill scheduling, alarm education and handover when staff change. She and her family need written information on warning signs and an emergency contact. As she has capacity, consent for each intervention comes from her.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you distinguish baclofen withdrawal from sepsis or neuroleptic malignant syndrome?
  • Why is oral baclofen not enough?
  • What are the signs of intrathecal baclofen overdose?
  • How would you prevent this happening again?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Treating it as sepsis alone and not contacting the pump service
  • Relying on oral baclofen as the definitive treatment
  • Silencing the pump alarm without interrogating the pump
  • Failing to disclose and report the missed refill

Reference: Coffey RJ et al, Abrupt withdrawal from intrathecal baclofen: recognition and management of a potentially life-threatening syndrome, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2002

Common reasons candidates fail the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation oral

  • ✕Lying a patient with autonomic dysreflexia flat or treating the blood pressure before the trigger
  • ✕Relying on oral baclofen for intrathecal baclofen withdrawal
  • ✕Performing needle EMG too early or omitting key muscles for localisation
  • ✕Prescribing a prosthesis without regard to functional level or the other limb
  • ✕Writing the impairment report that the patient or payer wants
  • ✕Using haloperidol, benzodiazepines or restraints as first-line treatment for agitation after brain injury

Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Amputation and Prosthetic Rehabilitation
  • Brain Injury Rehabilitation
  • Capacity, Consent and Goals of Care
  • Cardiac, Pulmonary and Cancer Rehabilitation
  • Disability Assessment, Certification and Medicolegal Practice
  • Electrodiagnosis and Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Interventional Spine and Musculoskeletal Medicine
  • Paediatric Rehabilitation and Cerebral Palsy
  • Pain Medicine and Opioid Stewardship
  • Patient Safety and Rehabilitation Complications
  • Spasticity Management
  • Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
  • Sports Medicine and Return to Activity
  • Stroke Rehabilitation

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation blueprint too, which covers:

  • Stroke and Brain Injury Rehabilitation
  • Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
  • Musculoskeletal, Spine and Pain Medicine
  • Electrodiagnostic Medicine
  • Amputation, Prosthetics and Orthotics
  • Paediatric and Neuromuscular Rehabilitation
  • Spasticity, Pharmacology and Interventional Procedures
  • Rehabilitation Principles, Cardiopulmonary Rehab, Ethics and Safety

Sitting the written exam as well? Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation question bank or the free Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.