Neelim للاستشارات الصحية
Neelim
Specialist & consultant · oral assessment

Specialist & Consultant Pediatric Surgery oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Child Protection and Safeguarding

A 14-month-old boy is brought to a Dubai emergency department by his father and the family nanny with two days of bilious vomiting. The father says the child fell from a sofa three days ago. He is quiet and withdrawn, heart rate 150, with bruises of different colours over the left ear and both upper arms, and the abdomen is mildly distended with epigastric tenderness. Lipase is 640 U/L and ALT 210 U/L. Ultrasound and CT show an intramural duodenal haematoma causing near-complete obstruction, and a small amount of free fluid. What is your approach?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing whether you recognise an injury pattern that does not fit the history, manage the surgical problem safely, and fulfil your legal duty to report suspected abuse without accusing anyone.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Pediatric Surgery oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Pediatric Surgery panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Pediatric Surgery, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you recognise the time-critical neonatal emergency, such as volvulus or oesophageal atresia, and act before investigations or transfers cost bowel, lung or life.
  • •The panel is testing whether you decide on operation from the child's physiology and response to resuscitation, not from imaging grade or adult surgical habits.
  • •The panel is testing whether you work inside a multidisciplinary oncology or transplant pathway, follow its protocols and avoid actions that upstage or harm the child.
  • •The panel is testing whether you know who can consent for a child under UAE law, when the emergency exception applies, and how to report suspected abuse without delay or accusation.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Pediatric Surgery scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Intestinal Obstruction and Malrotation

A 3-week-old boy born at term, now 3.6 kg, is transferred from Al Ain with eight hours of dark green vomiting. He is irritable, heart rate 186, capillary refill 4 seconds, with a mildly distended, tender abdomen and fresh blood in the nappy. Venous gas shows pH 7.21 and lactate 5.8 mmol/L. The radiograph shows a non-specific gas pattern. How would you manage this baby?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you treat neonatal bilious vomiting as volvulus until proven otherwise, and go to theatre without a contrast study when bowel is compromised.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: With shock, acidosis, a raised lactate and blood per rectum, my working diagnosis is midgut volvulus on malrotation with ischaemic bowel. The narrow-based mesentery lets the midgut twist clockwise around the superior mesenteric artery, and the whole midgut can necrose within hours. Atresia, necrotising enterocolitis and sepsis with ileus are differentials but do not change the priority. A normal plain film never excludes volvulus. In a stable baby an upper gastrointestinal contrast study is the test of choice, showing a malpositioned duodenojejunal flexure or a corkscrew duodenum, but peritonism and acidosis mean imaging must not delay laparotomy.

Management: I would pass a large-bore nasogastric tube on free drainage, secure access, send gas, blood count, coagulation, cross-match and cultures, give 10 to 20 mL/kg 0.9% saline boluses with reassessment, and start broad-spectrum antibiotics. I would aim to operate within the hour, resuscitating in parallel. At laparotomy I would detort anticlockwise, wrap the bowel in warm packs and assess viability, then complete a Ladd procedure: divide Ladd bands, widen the mesentery, place small bowel right and colon left, and remove the appendix. If viability is doubtful I would not resect widely but plan a second look at 24 to 48 hours. Frankly necrotic bowel is resected, with stomas if he is unstable. Afterwards he needs intensive care, parenteral nutrition and follow-up for short bowel if resection was large.

Ethics and communication: Consent comes from his guardian, but I would not delay surgery to find a particular relative, because UAE law permits emergency treatment without consent. I would tell the parents honestly that some bowel may already be dead and that a second operation, stomas or lifelong intestinal failure are possible. If transfer was delayed, I would record the facts neutrally and use the incident system, not the corridor.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Where should the duodenojejunal flexure lie on a normal contrast study?
  • Would you perform a laparoscopic Ladd procedure in this baby?
  • After detorsion the entire midgut is dusky. What do you do?
  • What do you tell the parents about the risk of recurrent volvulus?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Sending a shocked, acidotic baby for a contrast study before theatre
  • Being reassured by a normal plain radiograph
  • Resecting doubtfully viable bowel at the first operation instead of planning a second look
  • Detorting in the wrong direction or failing to widen the mesenteric base

Reference: Holcomb GW, Murphy JP, St Peter SD, Holcomb and Ashcraft's Pediatric Surgery (7th ed); Langer JC, Intestinal Rotation Abnormalities and Midgut Volvulus, Surgical Clinics of North America, 2017

Paediatric Trauma

An 8-year-old girl fell onto her bicycle handlebar 90 minutes ago in Dubai. She has left upper quadrant tenderness and shoulder tip pain. Heart rate is 138 and blood pressure 96/58, and after a 20 mL/kg crystalloid bolus her heart rate settles to 112. Haemoglobin is 98 g/L. Contrast CT shows a grade IV splenic laceration with moderate haemoperitoneum, no contrast blush, and a normal pancreas and left kidney. The adult general surgeon on call suggests splenectomy. What is your plan?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you base the decision on physiology rather than injury grade, run a safe non-operative pathway with clear failure criteria, and handle a disagreement with a colleague professionally.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is an isolated blunt splenic injury in a child who has responded to resuscitation, and non-operative management succeeds in the large majority, including high-grade injuries. The decision rests on haemodynamic response, not CT grade. Children compensate well, so persistent tachycardia is a more reliable warning than hypotension, which is late. Preserving the spleen avoids overwhelming post-splenectomy infection. A handlebar mechanism also raises pancreatic, duodenal and small bowel injury, which early CT can miss. The APSA evidence review supports physiology-based length of stay and activity restriction of about injury grade plus two weeks.

Management: I would take responsibility as the paediatric surgeon, admit her to a monitored bed, keep her nil by mouth initially, cross-match and repeat haemoglobin at about six hours. Further instability is treated with blood, 10 to 15 mL/kg packed red cells, not more crystalloid. Tranexamic acid within three hours of injury is reasonable at 15 mg/kg, maximum 1 g. I would define failure in advance: instability despite transfusion, or ongoing transfusion need, means theatre, attempting splenic salvage only if she is stable enough. Angioembolisation is for ongoing bleeding in a stable child where paediatric interventional radiology exists. I would re-examine her repeatedly, check lipase and avoid routine repeat CT. After any splenectomy she needs pneumococcal, meningococcal and Haemophilus vaccines and antibiotic prophylaxis.

Ethics and communication: Disagreement with a colleague is settled by discussing the evidence away from the family, and the agreed plan with its triggers is documented. I would explain to the parents that surgery may still be needed and take consent for possible splenectomy early. I would check that the story fits the injury as routine safeguarding. If the hospital cannot provide paediatric surgical and transfusion cover overnight, safe care means transfer.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What are your criteria for failure of non-operative management?
  • How long would you restrict contact sport, and on what evidence?
  • When is repeat imaging indicated after splenic injury?
  • On day three her lipase rises and she vomits bile. What are you worried about?
  • Which vaccines and prophylaxis does a child need after splenectomy?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Deciding on splenectomy from the CT grade alone in a responding child
  • Continuing large crystalloid boluses instead of giving blood
  • Missing a pancreatic or duodenal injury from a handlebar mechanism
  • Admitting without defined failure criteria or a responsible surgeon

Reference: Gates RL et al, Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in children: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee systematic review, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2019; American College of Surgeons, ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Course Manual (10th ed, 2018)

Hepatobiliary Surgery

A 7-week-old girl, born at term in Sharjah, is referred with persistent jaundice. Her mother says the stools have been pale for three weeks and the urine stains the nappy yellow. She is thriving at 4.9 kg. Total bilirubin is 168 micromol/L with conjugated bilirubin 132 micromol/L, ALT 140 U/L, GGT 620 U/L and INR 1.4. Fasting ultrasound shows a small irregular gallbladder and a triangular cord sign. How do you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you treat conjugated jaundice with pale stools as biliary atresia until proven otherwise, recognise that outcome is time dependent, and correct the coagulopathy before it causes a bleed.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in an infant is always pathological, and pale stools, dark urine, a raised GGT and a triangular cord sign make biliary atresia the working diagnosis. Differentials include choledochal cyst, Alagille syndrome, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, cytomegalovirus, galactosaemia, hypothyroidism and hypopituitarism. Results of Kasai portoenterostomy are better the earlier it is done, ideally before about 60 days of age, so she is already near the limit. Most cases obliterate the extrahepatic ducts up to the porta hepatis, so drainage depends on the portoenterostomy. The raised INR reflects vitamin K malabsorption, and the first thing that can harm her is an intracranial haemorrhage.

Management: Today I would give intravenous vitamin K and recheck the INR. In parallel I would send alpha-1 antitrypsin phenotype, cytomegalovirus testing, thyroid function, cortisol and a galactosaemia screen, without letting the work-up delay surgery, and refer her the same week to a centre experienced in Kasai surgery and liver transplantation. At operation, an intraoperative cholangiogram or direct inspection confirms the diagnosis, followed by a Kasai portoenterostomy. Afterwards she needs cholangitis prophylaxis, ursodeoxycholic acid, fat-soluble vitamins, a medium-chain triglyceride formula and bilirubin monitoring. Adjuvant steroids did not improve drainage in the START trial. Fever after a Kasai is cholangitis until proven otherwise. Failure to clear jaundice within the first few months means early transplant assessment.

Ethics and communication: I would explain to her guardian, who gives consent, that the Kasai is not a cure, that many children eventually need a liver transplant, and that time matters. If the family prefer surgery abroad, I would help them arrange it quickly rather than resist. I would document the delay since the pale stools began and use it to strengthen stool colour education in local primary care.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What is the significance of operating before 60 days?
  • Which investigation would change your plan before laparotomy?
  • How do you recognise and treat post-Kasai cholangitis?
  • When would you refer for transplant assessment?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Labelling it breast milk jaundice without measuring conjugated bilirubin
  • Delaying surgery for a long metabolic or nuclear medicine work-up
  • Failing to give vitamin K to a coagulopathic cholestatic infant
  • Promising the parents that the Kasai will cure her

Reference: Hartley JL, Davenport M, Kelly DA, Biliary atresia, Lancet, 2009; Fawaz R et al, Guideline for the Evaluation of Cholestatic Jaundice in Infants: Joint Recommendations of NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN, Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2017

Paediatric Oncology and Solid Tumours

A 3-year-old boy is brought by his mother, who noticed a swelling while bathing him. He is well, blood pressure 118/76 (above the 95th centile), with a smooth, non-tender 10 cm left flank mass that does not cross the midline. Urinalysis shows microscopic haematuria. CT shows a 10 cm mass arising from the left kidney with a claw sign, a patent left renal vein and inferior vena cava, a normal right kidney and three 6 mm nodules in the lungs. How would you proceed?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you know the two international treatment philosophies for Wilms tumour, avoid a biopsy or operation that upstages the child, and work inside the paediatric oncology team.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: The likely diagnosis is Wilms tumour, the commonest renal tumour of childhood, peaking at three to four years. The main differential is neuroblastoma, which calcifies, encases vessels and displaces rather than arises from the kidney; others are clear cell sarcoma and rhabdoid tumour. I would look for aniridia, genitourinary anomalies and overgrowth syndromes. The lung nodules suggest stage IV disease. SIOP practice, followed by many centres including in the Gulf, gives preoperative chemotherapy usually without biopsy, while the Children's Oncology Group favours upfront nephrectomy. Hypertension is often renin mediated, and acquired von Willebrand disease is recognised.

Management: I would refer immediately to the paediatric oncology team and not operate before that discussion. Work-up includes urinary catecholamines, blood count, renal function, coagulation with a von Willebrand screen, baseline echocardiography before anthracycline, and a central line. Hypertension is treated, often with a calcium channel blocker. Under SIOP practice he would receive about six weeks of vincristine, actinomycin D and doxorubicin for metastatic disease, then restaging. Biopsy is kept for atypical features, such as an unusual age or imaging. At surgery I would perform a transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy, avoid tumour rupture or spill because it upstages the child and adds treatment, and sample regional lymph nodes as the protocol requires. Postoperative chemotherapy and possible lung radiotherapy depend on histological risk group and response.

Ethics and communication: I would give the diagnosis honestly with the oncologist present, explaining that most children with Wilms tumour, including many with lung spread, are cured, without making promises. Consent comes from the guardian after full discussion of treatment and late effects. If the family seek treatment abroad, I would support a timely transfer with full records, and offer psychosocial support.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How does SIOP practice differ from Children's Oncology Group practice?
  • Why is intraoperative tumour spill important?
  • When would you biopsy a renal mass in a child?
  • How would bilateral tumours change your surgical plan?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Performing an open or percutaneous biopsy before the team has decided
  • Operating immediately outside the protocol and upstaging the child
  • Not excluding neuroblastoma with urinary catecholamines
  • Omitting lymph node sampling at nephrectomy

Reference: SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group, UMBRELLA SIOP-RTSG 2016 protocol (Wilms tumour treatment guidelines); Holcomb GW, Murphy JP, St Peter SD, Holcomb and Ashcraft's Pediatric Surgery (7th ed)

Consent, Guardianship and Refusal of Treatment

A 13-year-old boy presents to an Abu Dhabi emergency department at 23:00 with four hours of sudden severe left scrotal pain and vomiting. The left testis is high, horizontal and exquisitely tender, with an absent cremasteric reflex. His father, the legal guardian, is travelling with his phone switched off. His paternal uncle says nothing must be done until the father agrees in the morning, while his mother says she wants whatever the doctor advises. How do you proceed?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you recognise a time-critical organ-threatening emergency, know who can consent for a minor under UAE law, and act lawfully and humanely when the guardian cannot be reached.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is testicular torsion until proven otherwise: sudden onset, vomiting, a high horizontal testis and an absent cremasteric reflex. Torsion of an appendage, epididymo-orchitis and an incarcerated hernia are differentials, but none justifies waiting. Most testes are saved if detorsion occurs within about six hours, and salvage falls steeply after that. Doppler ultrasound should not delay exploration when the clinical picture is clear. Under UAE law consent for a person under 18 is given by the guardian, and informed consent is required before treatment except in an emergency. Waiting eight hours would very likely cost him the testis, so this meets the emergency threshold.

Management: I would give analgesia, keep him nil by mouth and alert theatre. I would ask the family to keep calling the father, while I involve the senior administrator on call as facility policy requires and ask a second consultant to confirm the emergency in writing. I would explain everything to the boy and seek his assent. If the father remains unreachable, I would proceed under the emergency exception, recording the time of each call. Through a scrotal incision I would detort the testis, assess viability with warm packs, fix it with non-absorbable sutures, and fix the other side, because the anatomical predisposition is usually bilateral. A clearly necrotic testis is removed. I would update the father as soon as he is reachable.

Ethics and communication: The uncle deserves courtesy, but he is not the guardian unless he holds legal authority, and his wish to wait cannot override the boy's interest in emergency care. The mother's agreement, the boy's assent, the second opinion and the reason it could not wait are all documented. I would avoid confrontation, and if the testis is lost I would disclose this openly.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Who can give consent for a 13-year-old in the UAE?
  • What would you do if the father answered and refused surgery?
  • Is there a role for manual detorsion in the emergency department?
  • Why do you fix the contralateral testis?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Waiting until morning for the father and losing the testis
  • Treating the uncle as the legal guardian without checking
  • Sending the boy for Doppler ultrasound and delaying exploration
  • Failing to document attempts to reach the guardian and the emergency basis

Reference: Federal Decree-Law No. 4 of 2016 on Medical Liability and Cabinet Resolution No. 40 of 2019 (UAE); EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology, European Association of Urology and European Society for Paediatric Urology, 2024

Neonatal Surgical Emergencies

A baby boy born at 36 weeks in Ras Al Khaimah, weighing 2.2 kg, has frothy secretions and chokes with his first feed. A 10 Fr orogastric tube stops at 10 cm and coils in the upper pouch on chest radiograph, with gas in the stomach and bowel. He has a single umbilical artery and an absent left thumb. Saturation is 94% in air and respiratory rate 64. How would you assess and manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing safe preoperative care of oesophageal atresia, recognition of associated anomalies that change the operation and prognosis, and an organised plan for repair and its complications.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is oesophageal atresia with a distal tracheo-oesophageal fistula, the commonest type, confirmed by gas in the stomach. The absent thumb and single umbilical artery point to the VACTERL association, so I must look for vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, renal and limb anomalies. The early dangers are aspiration from the upper pouch, acid reflux through the fistula, and, if ventilated, gas escaping into the stomach, causing distension and even perforation. Absence of gastric gas would instead suggest pure atresia with a long gap. Echocardiography matters twice: major cardiac disease and low birth weight drive prognosis, and a right-sided aortic arch may change the side of the thoracotomy.

Management: I would place a Replogle tube on continuous low suction, nurse him head up, keep him nil by mouth on intravenous 10% dextrose, and avoid bag-mask ventilation. If intubation becomes necessary, I would use gentle pressures and be ready to ligate the fistula urgently if the stomach distends. Before surgery I need echocardiography, renal ultrasound, spine radiographs and an anal examination. Repair is planned within the first day or two through a right extrapleural thoracotomy, or thoracoscopically in experienced hands: fistula division and ligation and a primary end-to-end anastomosis. If the gap is too long, a staged approach with gastrostomy is used. After surgery I would watch for anastomotic leak, stricture needing dilatation, recurrent fistula, tracheomalacia and gastro-oesophageal reflux, which is common and usually treated with acid suppression.

Ethics and communication: I would explain to the parents why he cannot feed yet and that further procedures such as dilatations are common; consent comes from the guardian. If tests show a life-limiting condition such as trisomy 18, the plan should be revisited in an honest, unhurried goals-of-care discussion rather than proceeding by default. Where parents are related, I would offer genetic counselling without blame.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How does a right-sided aortic arch change your approach?
  • What would you do if the gap between the pouches was too long?
  • He is ventilated and the abdomen is distending rapidly. What do you do?
  • What long-term problems should the parents expect?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Feeding or using bag-mask ventilation before the fistula is controlled
  • Operating without echocardiography
  • Missing an associated anorectal malformation
  • Forgetting reflux and stricture surveillance after discharge

Reference: Krishnan U et al, ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Complications in Children With Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula, Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2016; Holcomb GW, Murphy JP, St Peter SD, Holcomb and Ashcraft's Pediatric Surgery (7th ed)

Common reasons candidates fail the Pediatric Surgery oral

  • ✕Waiting for a contrast study or ultrasound in a shocked baby with bilious vomiting
  • ✕Removing a spleen in a child who has responded to resuscitation
  • ✕Biopsying or excising a renal mass before the oncology team has decided
  • ✕Delaying emergency surgery to obtain the consent of an unreachable guardian
  • ✕Accepting a minor-fall history for an injury that needs major force
  • ✕Managing a child like a small adult: wrong fluid volumes, drug doses or blood pressure thresholds

Pediatric Surgery oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Abdominal Wall, Hernia and Inguinoscrotal Conditions
  • Child Protection and Safeguarding
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Thoracic Surgery
  • Consent, Guardianship and Refusal of Treatment
  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Foreign Bodies
  • Hepatobiliary Surgery
  • Intestinal Obstruction and Malrotation
  • Neonatal Surgical Emergencies
  • Paediatric Oncology and Solid Tumours
  • Paediatric Trauma
  • Paediatric Urology and Genital Conditions
  • Patient Safety, Disclosure and Surgical Error
  • Perioperative Care, Fluids and Pain
  • The Acute Abdomen and Appendicitis

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Pediatric Surgery blueprint too, which covers:

  • Neonatal surgery and congenital anomalies
  • Abdominal and gastrointestinal surgery
  • Paediatric trauma
  • Paediatric surgical oncology
  • Paediatric urology and genital surgery
  • Thoracic, head and neck surgery
  • Perioperative care, fluids and nutrition
  • Ethics, consent, safeguarding and patient safety

Sitting the written exam as well? Pediatric Surgery question bank or the free Pediatric Surgery mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Pediatric Surgery - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.