Neelim للاستشارات الصحية
Neelim
Specialist & consultant · oral assessment

Specialist & Consultant Sports Medicine oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injury

A 26-year-old female basketball player in Abu Dhabi lands from a rebound, feels a pop in her right knee and cannot continue. The knee swells within two hours. On review two days later she has a large effusion, a positive Lachman test with a soft end point and a positive pivot shift under examination. MRI confirms a complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture with a bone bruise of the lateral femoral condyle and a vertical tear of the lateral meniscus. She asks whether she needs surgery and when she can play again. What is your approach?

What the panel is assessing

Whether you can counsel on operative versus rehabilitation-first management, protect the meniscus and give evidence-based, criteria-based return-to-sport advice.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Sports Medicine oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Sports Medicine panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Sports Medicine, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you can interpret a pre-participation ECG and imaging with confidence, separate athlete's heart from cardiomyopathy and hold to a safe decision under commercial pressure.
  • •The panel is testing whether you recognise and treat a pitch-side or event emergency such as heat stroke, cardiac arrest or concussion in the right order, with clear protocols and equipment ready.
  • •The panel is testing whether you see the whole athlete behind an injury, including energy deficiency, mental health and load, and coordinate a multidisciplinary, criteria-based return to play.
  • •The panel is testing whether you keep clinical independence and confidentiality as a team or event doctor, follow anti-doping rules and consent requirements, and act within UAE law and your scope.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Sports Medicine scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Sports Cardiology and Sudden Cardiac Death

A 22-year-old professional footballer in Abu Dhabi has a pre-participation ECG before signing a new contract. He is asymptomatic, but his uncle died suddenly aged 38. The ECG shows sinus bradycardia at 46 beats per minute, voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy and T-wave inversion of 2 mm in leads II, aVF, V5 and V6. Echocardiography shows a septal thickness of 14 mm and a left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of 47 mm. The club wants a decision within a week. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you can separate athlete's heart from cardiomyopathy using the international ECG criteria and multimodality imaging, and resist commercial pressure.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Sinus bradycardia and isolated voltage criteria are normal training-related findings, but inferolateral T-wave inversion of 1 mm or more in two or more contiguous leads is abnormal under the International Recommendations for ECG Interpretation in Athletes. A septum of 13 to 15 mm sits in the grey zone between physiological remodelling and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Features favouring HCM include asymmetric hypertrophy, a small cavity, impaired diastolic function, late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI and a family history of sudden death. Other causes of lateral T-wave inversion include arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. The ESC 2020 sports cardiology guideline allows individualised decisions in low-risk, mildly expressed HCM rather than automatic disqualification.

Management: I would arrange cardiac MRI with gadolinium as the key next test. I would add an exercise test, 24 to 48 hour ambulatory ECG and a detailed family history. If uncertainty remains, I would discuss genetic testing through a cardiogenetics service and, where appropriate, a supervised detraining period with repeat imaging. He should stop high-intensity training until assessment is complete. If HCM is confirmed, I would calculate the ESC HCM Risk-SCD score with the cardiologist. Any return to sport would be a shared decision based on risk, with an emergency action plan and an automated external defibrillator at training and matches. I would not clear him on echocardiography alone or to meet the transfer deadline. First-degree relatives should be offered screening.

Ethics and communication: My duty is to the player, not to the club's timetable. I would explain the uncertainty honestly and obtain his consent before sharing results with the club, telling the club only his fitness status unless he agrees to more. Genetic results need careful counselling, as they affect his relatives. I would document the advice in line with UAE law and facility policy.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which ECG findings in athletes are considered normal training-related changes?
  • The cardiac MRI shows no late enhancement and the septum is 13 mm. What next?
  • He asks to sign a waiver and play anyway. How do you respond?
  • How would you organise emergency response for sudden cardiac arrest at the stadium?
  • Would your interpretation of the T-wave inversion differ in an athlete of African or Afro-Caribbean origin?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Calling inferolateral T-wave inversion a normal athlete's heart finding
  • Clearing the player on a single echocardiogram under deadline pressure
  • Disclosing the diagnosis to the club without the player's consent
  • Forgetting cascade screening of first-degree relatives

Reference: ESC 2020 Guidelines on Sports Cardiology and Exercise in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease; Drezner JA et al, International Recommendations for Electrocardiographic Interpretation in Athletes (2017)

Sport-Related Concussion

A 16-year-old schoolboy rugby player in Dubai takes a head-on-head collision during a match. He was briefly unsteady, cannot recall the try that preceded the tackle and now reports headache and nausea. His GCS is 15, pupils are equal, and there is no neck pain or focal deficit. Four days later his father brings him to your clinic: his symptom score is 18 of 22 symptoms at low severity, and the coach wants him back for the cup final in eight days. How do you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing knowledge of the current concussion consensus, return to learn before return to sport, red flags, and how you handle pressure from coach and family around a minor.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is a sport-related concussion: a traumatic brain injury, here with amnesia and unsteadiness. Red flags that need emergency imaging include deteriorating consciousness, worsening headache, repeated vomiting, seizure, focal deficit and severe neck pain, and none is present. Adolescents recover more slowly than adults and are at risk of a second injury while symptomatic. The Amsterdam 2022 consensus advises a short period of relative rest of 24 to 48 hours, then symptom-limited light activity. Return to learn comes before return to full contact. Persisting symptoms beyond four weeks in children need multidisciplinary assessment.

Management: I would take a full history including previous concussions, migraine and mood, examine cervical spine, balance and eye movements, and record a symptom score with SCAT6 or the child version where appropriate. I would advise light aerobic activity that does not more than mildly worsen symptoms and limit screens. I would write to the school for temporary adjustments such as shorter days and extra time. Once fully back at school without symptoms, he would start the graded return-to-sport strategy, with at least 24 hours per step and return to symptoms prompting a step back. Full contact training requires medical clearance. I would not clear him for the final on a fixed date. If symptoms persist, I would refer for vestibular, cervical and psychological assessment.

Ethics and communication: He is under 18, so consent for treatment and for sharing information comes from his guardian, while I still involve him fully in the discussion. I would explain to the father and, with his agreement, to the coach that the decision is medical and not negotiable by match schedule. I would document the advice and clearance criteria.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What are the stages of the graded return-to-sport strategy?
  • When would you request a CT head scan?
  • He becomes symptom-free in 6 days. Can he play the final?
  • What is the evidence on strict prolonged rest?
  • His father says the school has no doctor and asks you to sign clearance in advance. What do you do?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Prescribing strict dark-room rest for weeks
  • Allowing return to contact before return to learning is complete
  • Giving a pre-dated clearance or setting a fixed return date
  • Missing cervical spine or vestibular contributors to symptoms
  • Seeking consent for information sharing from the minor alone

Reference: Patricios JS et al, Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport: the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Amsterdam 2022 (2023); Brukner and Khan's Clinical Sports Medicine (5th ed, 2017)

Environmental Illness: Heat, Hydration and Altitude

You are medical director for an evening half-marathon in Dubai in September, with a temperature of 33 C and humidity of 65 percent. At 18 km a 35-year-old male runner collapses, then becomes confused and combative. Rectal temperature is 41.8 C, heart rate 148, blood pressure 96/58 mmHg and capillary glucose 6.1 mmol/L. An ambulance is ten minutes away and the nearest hospital is 25 minutes by road. How do you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you diagnose exertional heat stroke promptly with a rectal temperature, apply the cool first, transport second principle, and plan event safety and return to activity.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Core temperature above 40.5 C with central nervous system dysfunction in an exercising person is exertional heat stroke until proven otherwise. Survival depends on the time spent above the critical threshold, so cooling within 30 minutes is the priority. Cold-water immersion is the most effective and preferred cooling method. Differentials to exclude are exercise-associated hyponatraemia, hypoglycaemia, cardiac arrest or arrhythmia, and head injury. Oral and tympanic temperatures are unreliable after exertion. Complications include rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, liver injury and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Management: I would secure the airway, check breathing and circulation, and immerse him to the neck in an ice-water tub at the medical tent with continuous rectal temperature monitoring. If a tub is unavailable, I would use rotating ice-water towels and continuous dousing. I would remove him from the water at about 38.6 to 39 C to avoid overshoot hypothermia. I would check sodium with a point-of-care analyser before giving any intravenous fluid, and give isotonic fluid if he is hypotensive and not hyponatraemic. Antipyretics have no role. Once cooled and stable, I would transfer him to hospital for creatine kinase, renal and liver function and coagulation monitoring. Return to activity would be gradual once symptoms and laboratory values normalise, with heat acclimatisation and a sports medicine review. For future events I would plan wet-bulb globe temperature monitoring, cooling stations and start times.

Ethics and communication: He lacks capacity, so I would act in his best interests under emergency provisions and explain events to him and his family once he recovers. I would record times, temperatures and treatment precisely, as this protects the patient and the team. I would report the case to the organiser and review whether event conditions were safe, without blaming the runner.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why do you not transport him immediately?
  • His sodium is 124 mmol/L. How does this change your plan?
  • What wet-bulb globe temperature thresholds would make you modify or cancel the race?
  • How do you decide when he can race again?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Relying on oral or tympanic temperature
  • Transferring before cooling, losing the critical first 30 minutes
  • Giving large volumes of hypotonic fluid without checking sodium
  • Using paracetamol or other antipyretics
  • Cooling below 38 C and causing hypothermia

Reference: Roberts WO et al, ACSM Expert Consensus Statement on Exertional Heat Illness: Recognition, Management, and Return to Activity (2021); Casa DJ et al, National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Exertional Heat Illnesses (2015)

Bone Stress Injury and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport

A 20-year-old female 1500 m runner presents with three weeks of groin pain on running, now present on walking. She has had no periods for eight months, her BMI is 17.6 kg/m2, and she reports a 3 kg weight loss this season. Hip internal rotation is painful and hopping reproduces the pain. MRI shows a compression-side femoral neck stress fracture with a fracture line extending to 30 percent of the neck width. Her DXA lumbar spine Z-score is -1.8. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you treat a high-risk bone stress injury safely and recognise it as a presentation of relative energy deficiency in sport needing multidisciplinary care.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Femoral neck stress fractures are high-risk because displacement can lead to avascular necrosis. Compression-side injuries on the inferomedial neck with a line under 50 percent of the width are usually managed non-operatively, while tension-side, wider or displaced fractures need urgent orthopaedic fixation. Amenorrhoea, low BMI, weight loss and low bone density point to relative energy deficiency in sport, in which low energy availability affects bone, endocrine, metabolic and psychological health. The IOC 2023 consensus provides the REDs Clinical Assessment Tool version 2 to grade risk. Functional hypothalamic amenorrhoea is a diagnosis of exclusion. An eating disorder must be screened for.

Management: I would stop running at once and start protected weight bearing with crutches until pain-free walking, and discuss with an orthopaedic surgeon in case of progression. I would repeat imaging if pain worsens. I would check pregnancy test, thyroid function, prolactin, FSH, LH, oestradiol, vitamin D, full blood count and electrolytes, and an ECG if bradycardic. The core treatment is restoring energy availability with a sports dietitian and, if disordered eating is present, a psychologist or eating disorder service. I would ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D. I would not use the combined oral contraceptive pill to treat bone health, as it masks amenorrhoea without improving bone density, though transdermal oestradiol with cyclic progesterone can be considered if recovery stalls. Return to running would follow a graded, pain-free programme with REDs criteria met.

Ethics and communication: She is an adult and decides who is told about her diagnosis, including her coach and parents. I would explain the risk of displacement and of long-term bone loss honestly. If she declines dietetic or psychological care, I would keep her engaged and document the advice and her decision.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What features would make you refer for surgical fixation?
  • How does the REDs CAT2 change your return-to-play decision?
  • Her coach wants her to lose another kilogram. How do you respond?
  • Which other bone stress injury sites are high risk?
  • How would your approach differ in a 15-year-old?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Allowing continued running or cross-training impact on a femoral neck fracture
  • Treating the fracture but missing the energy deficiency
  • Starting the oral contraceptive pill to restore periods
  • Failing to screen for an eating disorder

Reference: Mountjoy M et al, 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) Consensus Statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs); Brukner and Khan's Clinical Sports Medicine (5th ed, 2017)

Anti-Doping, Therapeutic Use Exemptions and Professional Integrity

You are team physician for a national cycling team at a stage race in Al Ain. The day before stage 3, a 27-year-old rider has a painful knee effusion after a crash. The team manager asks you to give an intra-articular corticosteroid injection so he can start, and also to give the whole team a 500 mL intravenous recovery infusion after each stage. He tells you not to record either. How do you respond?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing your knowledge of the WADA rules on glucocorticoids and intravenous infusions, and whether you protect the athlete and your own integrity against team pressure.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: All injectable routes of glucocorticoid administration, including intra-articular, are prohibited in-competition, and WADA publishes washout periods that apply before the in-competition period. Use within that window needs a therapeutic use exemption, granted only if there is a diagnosed condition, no reasonable permitted alternative, and no performance enhancement beyond return to health. Intravenous infusions or injections of more than 100 mL per 12-hour period are prohibited at all times unless legitimately received during hospital treatment, surgery or clinical investigation. Routine recovery infusions do not meet that exception. Athlete support personnel, including doctors, can commit anti-doping rule violations such as administration and complicity. Clinically, a post-traumatic effusion needs assessment for haemarthrosis, fracture or ligament injury before any injection.

Management: I would first examine the knee properly and arrange imaging, as an injection into an undiagnosed traumatic knee could mask a serious injury. I would offer permitted treatment such as ice, compression, aspiration if tense and simple analgesia, and advise withdrawal if he cannot ride safely. If a corticosteroid injection were genuinely indicated, I would check the WADA washout rules and apply for a therapeutic use exemption. I would decline the routine infusions and offer oral rehydration and nutrition instead. I would record every treatment accurately. I would explain my position to the manager in writing. If pressure continued, I would escalate to the team's medical lead or federation as appropriate.

Ethics and communication: My first duty is to the rider's health, and an unnecessary prohibited injection risks both harm and a ban for him and for me. Concealing treatment would breach professional standards and medical record-keeping duties. I would obtain the rider's informed consent for any treatment and be open with him about the rules. I would not let employment by the team compromise my clinical independence.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What are the criteria for granting a therapeutic use exemption?
  • A rider is dehydrated with vomiting and needs 1 L IV fluid in your team bus. What do you do?
  • Which inhaled asthma drugs need a TUE and which do not?
  • What is strict liability?
  • How would you handle a whereabouts failure reported by a junior rider?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Giving the injection without examining or imaging the knee
  • Believing intra-articular steroid is always permitted
  • Agreeing to undocumented treatment
  • Not knowing the 100 mL per 12 hours infusion rule

Reference: World Anti-Doping Code (2021); WADA Prohibited List; WADA International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions

Athlete Confidentiality, Mental Health and Conflicts of Interest

You are the club doctor for a professional football team in Sharjah. A 24-year-old midfielder asks to see you privately and describes six weeks of low mood, poor sleep and loss of interest since a season-ending injury and the end of his engagement. His PHQ-9 score is 18 and he reports passive thoughts that life is not worth living, with no plan or intent. He begs you not to tell the coach, who has already asked you why the player seems withdrawn. How do you proceed?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you assess suicide risk properly, treat depression in an athlete, and manage confidentiality when you are employed by the club.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is likely a moderately severe depressive episode, with injury, loss of athletic identity and relationship loss as triggers. Elite athletes have rates of mental illness similar to or higher than the general population, and injury is a recognised risk factor. I would screen for alcohol and substance use, bipolar features and psychotic symptoms. Passive suicidal ideation without plan or intent indicates lower immediate risk but needs a structured risk assessment and a safety plan. The IOC consensus on mental health in elite athletes supports treatment within a multidisciplinary team. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and psychological therapy are effective and are not prohibited by WADA.

Management: I would do a full risk assessment, asking about plans, means, previous attempts, protective factors and support. I would agree a written safety plan, including how to contact me and emergency services. I would refer him urgently to a psychiatrist or psychologist experienced with athletes, and discuss cognitive behavioural therapy and an SSRI. I would review him within one week. I would keep him connected with the team if he wishes. If his risk rose to active intent, I would arrange urgent psychiatric assessment. I would offer to tell the coach only that he is under medical care and his training status, without the diagnosis.

Ethics and communication: My duty of confidentiality is to the player, not the club, and I would share nothing without his consent, in line with Federal Law No. 2 of 2019 on health data. I would break confidentiality only if there were a serious risk to his life. Involuntary admission is governed by Federal Law No. 10 of 2019 on Mental Health and requires a mental disorder with serious risk. I would declare my dual role openly.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What questions make up a structured suicide risk assessment?
  • The coach threatens to complain about you to the board. What do you do?
  • He discloses daily use of sleeping tablets bought online. How does this change things?
  • How would you build mental health support into club practice?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Not asking directly about suicidal thoughts
  • Telling the coach the diagnosis to keep the employer satisfied
  • Promising absolute confidentiality whatever the risk
  • Avoiding antidepressants because of unfounded doping concerns

Reference: Reardon CL et al, Mental Health in Elite Athletes: International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement (2019); WMA Declaration of Lisbon on the Rights of the Patient

Common reasons candidates fail the Sports Medicine oral

  • ✕Clearing an athlete to play because of a match date, transfer deadline or coach demand
  • ✕Labelling abnormal ECG findings as normal training changes
  • ✕Measuring temperature orally or transporting a heat stroke casualty before cooling
  • ✕Treating a bone stress injury without asking about periods, diet and energy availability
  • ✕Giving or concealing a prohibited treatment, or not knowing the TUE process
  • ✕Sharing an athlete's diagnosis with the club or coach without consent

Sports Medicine oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Anti-Doping, Therapeutic Use Exemptions and Professional Integrity
  • Athlete Confidentiality, Mental Health and Conflicts of Interest
  • Bone Stress Injury and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport
  • Environmental Illness: Heat, Hydration and Altitude
  • Exercise as Medicine and Chronic Disease
  • Knee Ligament and Meniscal Injury
  • Paediatric and Adolescent Athlete
  • Para-Athlete and Disability Sport
  • Rehabilitation, Return to Play and Shared Decision-Making
  • Shoulder Instability and Upper Limb Injury
  • Spinal Injury and Pitch-Side Emergency Care
  • Sport-Related Concussion
  • Sports Cardiology and Sudden Cardiac Death
  • Tendinopathy and Overuse Injury

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Sports Medicine blueprint too, which covers:

  • Lower Limb Sports Injuries
  • Upper Limb and Spine Injuries
  • Sports Cardiology and Pre-participation Screening
  • Concussion and Head and Neck Injury
  • Exercise Physiology, Prescription and Special Populations
  • Medical and Environmental Problems in Athletes
  • Anti-Doping, Pharmacology and Sports Nutrition
  • Rehabilitation, Field Care and Professional Ethics

Sitting the written exam as well? Sports Medicine question bank or the free Sports Medicine mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Sports Medicine - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.