Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome and Stimulation Safety
A 27-year-old woman with polycystic ovary syndrome is on day 10 of a GnRH antagonist IVF cycle in Abu Dhabi. Her AMH was 8.9 ng/mL and antral follicle count 42. Today's scan shows 31 follicles over 10 mm, and serum oestradiol is 4,900 pg/mL. She and her husband want a fresh transfer because a friend said frozen embryos do worse. The fellow has prescribed an hCG 10,000 IU trigger for tonight. What would you do?
What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you foresee a high OHSS risk and change the plan before harm occurs, and explain it well to a couple who want otherwise.
Show the answer outline
Knowledge: She is a predicted high responder, with PCOS, high AMH, a large follicle cohort and high oestradiol. An hCG trigger would put her at high risk of moderate to severe OHSS. OHSS is driven by hCG through VEGF release, causing capillary leak, haemoconcentration and thrombosis risk. Early OHSS follows the trigger, while late OHSS follows pregnancy hCG and is usually more severe. Because she is in an antagonist cycle, a GnRH agonist trigger is possible and greatly reduces early OHSS. Freezing all embryos removes the risk of late OHSS, and ESHRE supports both measures in high responders.
Management: I would cancel the hCG and give a GnRH agonist trigger, for example triptorelin 0.2 mg, with retrieval 35 to 36 hours later. I would plan to vitrify all suitable embryos with no fresh transfer. After retrieval I would check her pain, abdomen and vital signs. She would leave with written warning signs: rapid weight gain, swelling, breathlessness and reduced urine, plus a direct unit number. I would review her within a few days, with haematocrit, electrolytes and ultrasound if symptomatic. I would not rely on coasting, cabergoline or albumin instead of a safer trigger. The frozen transfer would follow in a later cycle. I would also lower her FSH dose next time.
Ethics and communication: I would listen to the couple, but I must not expose her to a foreseeable, serious and avoidable harm. I would answer the friend's claim with the evidence in plain language. I would record the discussion and their consent to the revised plan. If they still insisted on hCG and a fresh transfer, I would decline and offer a second opinion. I would review the missed risk with the fellow as learning, not blame.
Likely panel follow-up questions
- How do you classify the severity of OHSS, and what would make you admit her?
- If she had been in an agonist long protocol, what options would you have?
- What is the role of dual trigger in this situation?
- She develops ascites and a haematocrit of 48% one week later. How do you manage her?
- How would you set the FSH dose differently in her next cycle?
Pitfalls in this case
- Proceeding with an hCG trigger and fresh transfer because the couple asked for it
- Relying on cabergoline or albumin alone instead of changing the trigger
- Forgetting that late OHSS is driven by pregnancy and is prevented by freeze-all
- Discharging her without written warning signs and a direct contact route
- Failing to review the stimulation dose that created the risk
Reference: ESHRE Guideline: Ovarian Stimulation for IVF/ICSI, 2025 update; RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 5: The Management of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, 2016