Diagnostic Radiology Prometric exam questions
Exam-length papers covering every published domain for Diagnostic Radiology.
Tell us which regulator you are sitting and we send the bank prepared for that authority's exam.
Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.
What is riding on this exam
One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This bank costs about a third of one exam fee.
Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.
The Diagnostic Radiology exam at a glance
DHA (UAE) publishes a Diagnostic Radiology exam of 150 MCQs in 3 hours with a 65% pass mark; SCFHS (Saudi Arabia) publishes a Diagnostic Radiology exam of 200 MCQs in 240 minutes with a 65% pass mark; QCHP (Qatar) publishes a Diagnostic Radiology exam of 150 MCQs in 3 hours with a 65% pass mark; OMSB (Oman) publishes a Diagnostic Radiology exam of 100 MCQs in 150 minutes with a 65% pass mark. MOHAP, SHA, NHRA do not publish Diagnostic Radiology-specific figures; their regulator-wide format and pass-mark rules are in the full table. DOH licenses the title without a published written exam (credential review, interview or an unpublished assessment). Kuwait MOH publishes no exam for this title.
- DHA · UAE
- Specialist Diagnostic Radiology (SDR6042)
- 150 MCQs in 3 hours · pass mark 65% · USD 280 (about AED 1,030) · checked September 2026
- SCFHS · Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Classification Examination - Diagnostic Radiology
- 200 MCQs in 240 minutes · pass mark 65% · checked October 2026
- QCHP · Qatar
- Specialist Diagnostic Radiology
- 150 MCQs in 3 hours · pass mark 65% · checked September 2026
- OMSB · Oman
- Omani Examination for Diagnostic Radiology (OEDR)
- 100 MCQs in 150 minutes · pass mark 65% · USD 220 (about OMR 80) · checked September 2026
From each regulator's own exam documents; the DHA row is from the DHA CBT Guideline, Sep 2026. Every other regulator is in the full GCC table.
Try two questions from this bank
Original questions from the bank - pick an answer to see the rationale and reference.
A technologist asks why Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) localises in bone. Which mechanism best explains its skeletal uptake?
Choose an answer to see the rationale.
Before Y-90 radioembolisation of hepatic metastases, a Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin scan is performed. What is the principal purpose of this work-up study?
Choose an answer to see the rationale.
Not sure where you stand? Sit 25 of these questions free, timed at real exam pace, and see which domains you are weakest in.
Take the free mock exam →Liked those? The full bank has 440 questions at this standard - every one with a rationale and a reference.
Get the full bank - AED 319What's inside
- ✓3 to 6 full-length papers (~145 Q each)
- ✓No question repeated between papers
- ✓Four options, one unambiguous best answer
- ✓A full rationale on every question
- ✓A real guideline or textbook reference
- ✓Every sub-topic in the published blueprint
- ✓Researched by Neelim's exam research team
- ✓Prepared for your authority's exam, not a generic set
The Diagnostic Radiology exam in every GCC country
| Regulator | Exam | Format | Pass mark | Fee per attempt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Specialist Diagnostic Radiology (SDR6042) | 150 MCQs in 3 hours | 65% | USD 280 (about AED 1,030) | |
Saudi Classification Examination - Diagnostic Radiology | 200 MCQs in 240 minutes | 65% | Not published | |
Specialist Diagnostic Radiology | 150 MCQs in 3 hours | 65% | Not published | |
Omani Examination for Diagnostic Radiology (OEDR) | 100 MCQs in 150 minutes | 65% | USD 220 (about OMR 80) | |
No written exam published Oral assessment, 45-60 minutes; no written exam (DOH Licensing Procedure Manual 2024) | Panel / review | Not published | Not published | |
MOHAP licensing exam Regulator-wide format | Computer-based | Not published | Not published | |
SHA licensing exam Regulator-wide format | Set at assessment | Not published | Not published | |
NHRA licensing exam Regulator-wide format | Prometric CBT | Not published | Not published | |
No exam published for this title Kuwait MOH publishes no exam for this title; check with the MOH | Not published | Not published | Not published |
Highlighted rows publish figures for this exact Diagnostic Radiology exam; the others show the regulator's general rules.
From each regulator's own exam pages; anything a regulator does not publish says so. Assessment mode also depends on your licence title, so confirm your route on your eligibility notice.
Try 15 free Diagnostic Radiology questions with answersDifferent from the samples on this page - each with a full explanationStart →What the Diagnostic Radiology exam covers
The published blueprint for this exam breaks into 13 domains and 220 testable sub-topics. Our bank covers every one of them - here is the full map, so you can see exactly what you are expected to know.
Body Imaging (Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary, Genitourinary and Abdominopelvic)12% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 1)18 topics
- Acute abdomen CT: bowel obstruction vs ileus, closed-loop obstruction, transition point and bowel ischaemia signs (pneumatosis, portal venous gas, poor mural enhancement)
- Acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, epiploic appendagitis and omental infarction - discriminating CT features and mimics
- Hollow viscus perforation: free intraperitoneal air, extraluminal contrast, retroperitoneal vs intraperitoneal gas patterns
- Focal liver lesions: hepatocellular carcinoma LI-RADS categorisation, FNH, hepatic adenoma subtypes, haemangioma, metastases - multiphase CT/MRI and hepatobiliary contrast agents
- Diffuse liver disease: cirrhosis morphology, portal hypertension and varices, fatty liver and iron quantification (MR PDFF, R2*), Budd-Chiari
- Biliary imaging: choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, Mirizzi syndrome, cholangiocarcinoma, primary sclerosing cholangitis, MRCP technique and pitfalls
- +12 more in the bank
Neuro Imaging (Brain, Spine, Head Trauma and Neurovascular)12% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 2)18 topics
- Acute ischaemic stroke: non-contrast CT early signs, ASPECTS scoring, CT angiography for large vessel occlusion, CT/MR perfusion core-penumbra mismatch and thrombectomy selection windows
- Intracranial haemorrhage: hyperacute-to-chronic MRI signal evolution, spot sign, hypertensive vs lobar/amyloid vs underlying lesion
- Subarachnoid haemorrhage, cerebral aneurysms and vascular malformations: AVM, dural AV fistula, cavernoma, developmental venous anomaly
- Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: empty delta sign, MR venography, venous infarction
- Traumatic brain injury: extradural vs subdural vs contusion, diffuse axonal injury, herniation syndromes, skull base and temporal bone fractures
- CNS neoplasms: glioma grading and 2021 WHO molecular era imaging, meningioma, metastases, lymphoma; advanced techniques (perfusion rCBV, MR spectroscopy, diffusion)
- +12 more in the bank
Head and Neck Imaging5% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 3)16 topics
- Suprahyoid and infrahyoid neck spaces: parapharyngeal, masticator, carotid, retropharyngeal, prevertebral and visceral space anatomy and lesion localisation
- Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: primary site staging by subsite (nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, oral cavity), HPV-related disease, perineural spread
- Cervical nodal disease: imaging-based nodal levels, criteria for malignancy, extranodal extension, cystic nodal metastasis
- Salivary gland lesions: pleomorphic adenoma, Warthin tumour, malignant tumours, sialolithiasis, sialadenitis, IgG4 disease
- Thyroid imaging: ACR TI-RADS/ultrasound risk stratification, nodule FNA thresholds, thyroid cancer staging, retrosternal goitre
- Parathyroid localisation: ultrasound, 4D-CT and sestamibi/SPECT correlation
- +10 more in the bank
Musculoskeletal Imaging12% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 4)17 topics
- Fracture description and healing: Salter-Harris, stress and insufficiency fractures, non-union/malunion, occult fracture MRI
- Named and commonly missed fractures: scaphoid, Lisfranc, radial head, tibial plateau, hip and pelvic ring, sacral insufficiency
- Shoulder MRI/MR arthrography: rotator cuff tears, labral tears (SLAP, Bankart and variants), impingement, adhesive capsulitis, biceps pathology
- Knee MRI: meniscal tear patterns and root tears, cruciate and collateral ligaments, cartilage grading, patellar dislocation bone bruise pattern, Segond fracture
- Hip and pelvis: femoroacetabular impingement (cam/pincer, alpha angle), labral tear, avascular necrosis staging, transient osteoporosis, athletic pubalgia
- Ankle, foot and wrist: ligament and tendon injury, osteochondral lesions, TFCC and carpal instability, plantar fasciitis, Morton neuroma
- +11 more in the bank
Chest Imaging (Thoracic Radiology)12% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 5)17 topics
- Chest radiograph systematic interpretation: silhouette sign, lobar collapse patterns, air bronchogram, deep sulcus sign, line and tube positioning
- Pulmonary consolidation and infection: community-acquired vs hospital-acquired pneumonia, aspiration distribution, abscess vs empyema, viral pneumonias including COVID-19 patterns
- Pulmonary tuberculosis: primary vs post-primary features, miliary disease, cavitation, tree-in-bud, sequelae; non-tuberculous mycobacteria
- Interstitial lung disease on HRCT: UIP vs probable UIP vs indeterminate (Fleischner/ATS criteria), NSIP, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis staging, organising pneumonia
- Pulmonary nodules: solid, part-solid and ground-glass; Fleischner Society 2017 follow-up recommendations, Lung-RADS and lung cancer screening
- Lung cancer: TNM 8th/9th edition staging, imaging for mediastinal nodal assessment, PET-CT staging, post-treatment and immunotherapy response (pseudoprogression)
- +11 more in the bank
Cardiovascular Imaging7% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 6)16 topics
- Cardiac CT angiography: acquisition (prospective vs retrospective gating), heart rate and rhythm control, radiation dose reduction, motion and blooming artefacts
- Coronary artery disease: calcium scoring (Agatston) and risk, CAD-RADS 2.0 stenosis reporting, plaque characterisation, high-risk plaque features, CT-FFR
- Coronary anomalies and bypass graft assessment; stent patency and in-stent restenosis limitations
- Cardiac MRI fundamentals: cine SSFP function and volumes, T1/T2 mapping, extracellular volume, late gadolinium enhancement patterns (ischaemic subendocardial vs non-ischaemic mid-wall/epicardial)
- Cardiomyopathies: dilated, hypertrophic (including apical), arrhythmogenic right ventricular, restrictive and infiltrative disease (amyloid, sarcoid, Fabry, iron overload T2*)
- Myocarditis and Lake Louise criteria; stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy
- +10 more in the bank
Paediatric Imaging12% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 7)17 topics
- ALARA in children: dose optimisation, size-based protocols, Image Gently principles, justification and ultrasound/MRI-first strategies, sedation and anaesthesia considerations
- Neonatal chest: respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnoea, meconium aspiration, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, air-leak syndromes, line and tube positions
- Paediatric airway and chest infection: croup vs epiglottitis, bronchiolitis, round pneumonia, foreign body aspiration and decubitus/expiratory films
- Neonatal abdominal emergencies: necrotising enterocolitis, malrotation with midgut volvulus and upper GI series, duodenal/jejunal atresia, meconium ileus, Hirschsprung disease
- Infant and child acute abdomen: hypertrophic pyloric stenosis ultrasound criteria, intussusception diagnosis and air/fluid reduction, appendicitis in children
- Paediatric genitourinary: hydronephrosis (SFU/UTD grading), vesicoureteric reflux and VCUG, posterior urethral valves, PUJ obstruction, duplex systems and ureterocele, DMSA scarring
- +11 more in the bank
Women's Imaging (Breast, Obstetric and Gynaecologic)8% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 8)17 topics
- Mammography technique and quality: standard and additional views, positioning criteria, adequate compression, digital breast tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced mammography
- BI-RADS lexicon and assessment categories 0-6 with corresponding management recommendations; audit metrics (recall rate, PPV, cancer detection rate)
- Breast masses and calcifications: benign vs suspicious morphology and distribution, architectural distortion, asymmetry types
- Breast ultrasound: BI-RADS ultrasound descriptors, simple vs complicated vs complex cyst, fibroadenoma vs carcinoma, axillary node assessment
- Breast MRI: indications (high-risk screening, extent of disease, occult primary, implant integrity, neoadjuvant response), background parenchymal enhancement, kinetics, abbreviated protocols
- Breast cancer imaging: invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma, DCIS, inflammatory carcinoma, staging and multifocality/multicentricity
- +11 more in the bank
Contrast Media, Imaging Physics and Radiation Safety10% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 11)18 topics
- X-ray production and radiographic physics: tube design, kVp/mAs relationships, beam filtration, scatter and grids, digital detectors, exposure index
- CT physics: helical acquisition and pitch, reconstruction kernels, iterative and deep-learning reconstruction, dual-energy/spectral CT applications, CTDIvol and DLP
- MRI physics: T1/T2/PD contrast, TR/TE/flip angle, spin echo vs gradient echo, inversion recovery (STIR, FLAIR), diffusion and ADC, fat suppression techniques
- MRI artefacts and their correction: susceptibility, chemical shift, motion and ghosting, aliasing/wrap, truncation, dielectric effects at 3T
- MRI safety: ASTM/ACR zones I-IV, screening for implants and devices, MR-conditional cardiac devices, projectile hazard, SAR and thermal injury, acoustic noise, gadolinium in pregnancy
- Ultrasound physics: transducer selection and frequency-resolution-penetration trade-off, harmonic imaging, Doppler principles, aliasing and Nyquist, artefacts (shadowing, enhancement, mirror, reverberation, twinkle), thermal and mechanical index
- +12 more in the bank
Patient Safety and Quality in Radiology5% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 10)17 topics
- Patient identification and the correct-patient/correct-site/correct-procedure process; WHO surgical safety and procedural checklists adapted to interventional radiology
- Request justification and vetting: appropriateness criteria (ACR/iRefer/ESR), clinical decision support, avoiding unnecessary and duplicated imaging
- Radiology reporting quality: structured reporting, clarity and avoidance of ambiguous hedging, actionable findings, addenda and report amendment governance
- Critical and unexpected findings: definition, tiered communication timeframes, closed-loop documented notification, escalation when the referrer is unreachable
- Diagnostic error: perceptual vs cognitive error, satisfaction of search, anchoring and premature closure, alliterative and framing bias, fatigue and reading-volume effects
- Peer review and peer learning: RADPEER-type scoring, discrepancy meetings, learning from excellence, just culture vs blame culture
- +11 more in the bank
Professionalism, Ethics, Law and Research Methodology5% (verified - SCFHS/DHA blueprint section 9: 'Ethics and Research')17 topics
- Core bioethical principles applied to imaging: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice; balancing radiation risk against diagnostic benefit
- Informed consent for imaging and image-guided procedures: capacity assessment, material risk disclosure, consent in emergencies, consent for minors and for patients lacking capacity
- Confidentiality and data protection: image and report privacy, UAE/GCC health data laws and cross-border data rules, incidental discovery of sensitive information, social media and messaging-app image sharing
- Incidental findings and overdiagnosis: duty to report, follow-up recommendation stewardship, communicating uncertainty, the 'incidentaloma' burden
- Disclosure of error and duty of candour: apologising, documenting, involving risk management, supporting the second victim
- Professional boundaries and conflicts of interest: industry relationships, self-referral, fee-splitting, gifts and hospitality, ghost reporting and outsourcing
- +11 more in the bank
Interventional and Vascular Radiology (procedural competence)cross-cutting (est. ~4-6%; not a separate blueprint section - items are distributed within Body, Chest, Neuro and Cardiovascular Imaging)16 topics
- Pre-procedure assessment: indication review, coagulation and platelet thresholds, anticoagulant/antiplatelet holding periods, renal function, allergy, consent and sedation planning
- Vascular access and closure: femoral vs radial access, ultrasound-guided puncture, sheath selection, closure devices, access-site complications (pseudoaneurysm, retroperitoneal haematoma, AV fistula)
- Catheters, wires, stents and embolic agents: coils, plugs, particles, glue and Onyx, liquid sclerosants - selection principles and non-target embolisation risk
- Arterial haemorrhage embolisation: gastrointestinal bleeding, post-partum haemorrhage, trauma (splenic, hepatic, pelvic), epistaxis, haemoptysis/bronchial artery embolisation
- Endovascular management of aneurysms and dissection: EVAR/TEVAR, endoleak diagnosis and treatment, fenestrated grafts
- Peripheral arterial intervention: angioplasty, stenting, atherectomy, drug-coated devices, acute limb ischaemia thrombolysis
- +10 more in the bank
Nuclear Medicine, Molecular and Hybrid Imagingcross-cutting (est. ~3-5%; not a separate blueprint section - distributed within organ-system sections and the Physics section)16 topics
- Radiopharmaceuticals in routine use: Tc-99m agents, I-123/I-131, F-18 FDG, Ga-68 DOTATATE and PSMA, Lu-177 therapeutics - mechanisms and biodistribution
- FDG PET-CT physiology and pitfalls: preparation and fasting, hyperglycaemia effects, brown fat, muscle and bowel uptake, inflammation vs malignancy, post-treatment timing
- PET-CT in oncology staging and response: Deauville criteria in lymphoma, PERCIST/RECIST principles, restaging and surveillance, radiotherapy planning
- Bone scintigraphy: metastatic disease and flare phenomenon, superscan, stress fracture, osteomyelitis three-phase study, complex regional pain syndrome, prosthesis loosening vs infection
- Thyroid and parathyroid nuclear medicine: uptake scans in thyrotoxicosis, I-131 therapy for hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer, sestamibi parathyroid localisation
- Cardiac nuclear imaging: myocardial perfusion SPECT/PET, stress protocols (exercise, adenosine, regadenoson, dobutamine), viability, amyloid imaging with bone-avid tracers, MUGA ejection fraction
- +10 more in the bank
12 worked Diagnostic Radiology practice questions
Original exam-style questions from the bank, spread across the blueprint domains. They are not real or recalled exam questions. Try each one, then open the answer for the rationale and reference. None of them appear in the free mock exam, so reading them will not spoil it.
Question 1 · Body Imaging (Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary, Genitourinary and Abdominopelvic)
Doppler ultrasound of a renal allograft three days after transplantation shows a resistive index of 0.95 in the interlobar arteries with reversed end-diastolic flow, and Doppler of a liver allograft in a different patient shows a hepatic artery resistive index of 0.4 with a systolic acceleration time of 0.15 seconds and a tardus-parvus waveform. Which interpretation is correct?
- ABoth findings indicate venous outflow obstruction in the respective grafts
- BThe renal finding suggests severe graft dysfunction requiring urgent evaluation; the hepatic finding suggests hepatic artery stenosis
- CThe renal finding is a normal early post-transplant appearance; the hepatic finding indicates hepatic artery thrombosis
- DBoth findings are within normal limits for the first postoperative week
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. The renal finding suggests severe graft dysfunction requiring urgent evaluation; the hepatic finding suggests hepatic artery stenosis
A resistive index of 0.95 with reversed diastolic flow in a renal allograft is markedly abnormal and non-specific for severe parenchymal dysfunction from acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis or renal vein thrombosis, and it demands urgent clinical and often surgical evaluation. In the hepatic artery, a tardus-parvus waveform with resistive index below 0.5 and acceleration time above 0.08 seconds indicates a proximal stenosis. Hepatic artery thrombosis would show absent rather than damped intrahepatic arterial signal. Neither pattern is a normal early post-transplant finding, and neither is specific for venous outflow obstruction, which produces its own abnormal venous waveforms.
Reference: Sidhu PS et al., 'Ultrasound of the Transplant Kidney and Liver', Ultrasound Clinics / EFSUMB Guidelines, 2017; Crossin JD et al., 'US of Liver Transplants: Normal and Abnormal', RadioGraphics (RSNA), 2003
Question 2 · Musculoskeletal Imaging
A 66-year-old man with smouldering myeloma has no CRAB features on laboratory testing. Whole-body MRI is performed. According to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, which MRI finding by itself defines multiple myeloma requiring therapy?
- ADiffusely heterogeneous ('salt-and-pepper') marrow signal without discrete lesions
- BMore than one unequivocal focal lesion measuring at least 5 mm
- CA single focal lesion measuring 4 mm
- DAny high signal on STIR images within the axial marrow
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. More than one unequivocal focal lesion measuring at least 5 mm
The IMWG updated criteria include, among the myeloma-defining events, more than one focal lesion of at least 5 mm on MRI, which upgrades smouldering myeloma to symptomatic disease requiring treatment. A single focal lesion, sub-5 mm lesions, or a variegated/heterogeneous marrow pattern do not meet the threshold and are managed with repeat imaging, and non-specific STIR hyperintensity can reflect degenerative or haematopoietic change.
Reference: Rajkumar SV et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncology 2014; MY-RADS (Messiou C et al., Radiology 2019)
Question 3 · Paediatric Imaging
A four-year-old has a heterogeneous, calcified, mildly enhancing posterior fossa mass arising from the floor of the fourth ventricle that extends laterally through the foramen of Luschka into the cerebellopontine angle and inferiorly through the foramen magnum, moulding around the medulla. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AEpendymoma
- BMedulloblastoma
- CAtypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour
- DBrainstem (diffuse midline) glioma
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Ependymoma
Extension of a fourth-ventricular tumour through the foramina of Luschka and Magendie while moulding to surrounding structures - the 'plastic' tumour - with frequent calcification is characteristic of posterior fossa ependymoma. Medulloblastoma is usually a more spherical midline mass with marked diffusion restriction that displaces rather than extrudes through the foramina; ATRT occurs in children under three and is typically large, haemorrhagic and off-midline; a diffuse midline glioma expands the pons itself rather than filling the fourth ventricle.
Reference: WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, 5th ed. (2021); Caffey's Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging, 13th ed. (2019)
Question 4 · Women's Imaging (Breast, Obstetric and Gynaecologic)
In a screening mammography audit of 1000 examinations, 100 women were recalled (BI-RADS 0), 20 of whom were ultimately given a biopsy recommendation (BI-RADS 4 or 5), and 5 cancers were diagnosed. What is the positive predictive value for biopsy recommended (PPV2)?
- A5%
- B20%
- C25%
- D50%
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. 25%
PPV2 is the number of cancers divided by the number of examinations for which biopsy was recommended, i.e. 5/20 = 25%. PPV1 (based on abnormal screening interpretations) would be 5/100 = 5%, and the cancer detection rate here is 5 per 1000. PPV3 is calculated only from biopsies actually performed, which is not given.
Reference: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, 5th edition, Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring chapter (2013)
Question 5 · Head and Neck Imaging
A 7-year-old child has fluctuating, stepwise progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, worse after minor head trauma. High-resolution CT shows a vestibular aqueduct measuring 2.4 mm at the operculum with a cystic apical-middle turn confluence of the cochlea and a normal basal turn. What is the diagnosis?
- AMichel aplasia
- BCommon cavity malformation
- CIncomplete partition type II with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct
- DCochlear aplasia with a normal vestibule
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Incomplete partition type II with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct
Incomplete partition type II (the Mondini deformity) comprises a normal basal turn with a cystic fused apical and middle turn, often with a dilated vestibule and an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (more than 1.0 mm at the midpoint or 2.0 mm at the operculum by the Cincinnati criteria), and typically produces fluctuating hearing loss provoked by minor trauma. Michel aplasia is complete labyrinthine agenesis and common cavity is a single undifferentiated cochleovestibular cavity, neither of which is present here. Cochlear aplasia implies an absent cochlea, which is inconsistent with the described turns.
Reference: Sennaroglu L & Bajin MD, Classification of inner ear malformations, Journal of International Advanced Otology (2017); Vijayasekaran S et al., AJNR (2007)
Question 6 · Professionalism, Ethics, Law and Research Methodology
Two radiologists independently assign BI-RADS categories to 200 mammograms. Raw percentage agreement is 88%, but the calculated Cohen kappa is 0.42. Which interpretation is correct?
- AAgreement beyond that expected by chance is only moderate, because much of the raw agreement is explained by the skewed distribution of categories
- BThe kappa value is invalid because raw agreement exceeds 80%
- CKappa of 0.42 indicates almost perfect agreement by conventional benchmarks
- DKappa measures the accuracy of the readers against pathology rather than their agreement
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Agreement beyond that expected by chance is only moderate, because much of the raw agreement is explained by the skewed distribution of categories
Kappa corrects raw agreement for agreement expected by chance, and when one category dominates the distribution a high raw percentage agreement can coexist with only moderate kappa, which by the Landis and Koch benchmarks is 0.41 to 0.60. High raw agreement does not invalidate kappa, 0.42 is not almost perfect (that band is above 0.80), and kappa quantifies inter-observer agreement rather than accuracy against a reference standard.
Reference: Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 1977; Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of Observer Agreement, Radiology, 2003
Question 7 · Nuclear Medicine, Molecular and Hybrid Imaging
A patient with a small bowel neuroendocrine tumour has both Ga-68 DOTATATE PET-CT and FDG PET-CT. The liver metastases are DOTATATE-negative but intensely FDG-avid. What does this mismatch most likely indicate?
- AA well-differentiated grade 1 tumour that will respond well to Lu-177 DOTATATE
- BDedifferentiated, higher-grade disease with loss of somatostatin receptor expression and a poorer prognosis
- CA technical failure of the DOTATATE synthesis
- DPhysiological hepatic uptake obscuring true DOTATATE-avid lesions
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Dedifferentiated, higher-grade disease with loss of somatostatin receptor expression and a poorer prognosis
Loss of somatostatin receptor expression with high glycolytic activity (a 'flip-flop' or mismatch pattern) indicates dedifferentiation and higher-grade biology, predicting poorer outcome and unsuitability for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Grade 1 tumours are typically DOTATATE-avid and FDG-negative, and a synthesis failure would abolish uptake in normal spleen and adrenals as well, which is not described.
Reference: ENETS Consensus Guidelines for standards of care in neuroendocrine tumours: radiological and nuclear medicine imaging (Sundin et al., Neuroendocrinology, 2017)
Question 8 · Neuro Imaging (Brain, Spine, Head Trauma and Neurovascular)
Which parenchymal MRI pattern most strongly favours venous infarction over arterial infarction?
- AWedge-shaped cortical and subcortical lesion conforming to a single arterial territory
- BUniformly restricted diffusion throughout the lesion with low ADC values
- CBilateral parasagittal haemorrhagic lesions with extensive vasogenic oedema crossing arterial boundaries
- DLacunar lesion in the posterior limb of the internal capsule
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Bilateral parasagittal haemorrhagic lesions with extensive vasogenic oedema crossing arterial boundaries
Venous infarcts arise from raised venous pressure rather than arterial occlusion, so they cross arterial territories, are frequently bilateral and parasagittal with superior sagittal sinus thrombosis, and characteristically show prominent vasogenic oedema with a high rate of petechial or frank haemorrhage. Arterial infarcts respect a defined arterial territory and show early, relatively uniform cytotoxic oedema with restricted diffusion. A lacunar lesion in the internal capsule reflects small vessel arterial disease, and both a single-territory wedge and a lacune argue against a venous cause.
Reference: Saposnik G et al., AHA/ASA Scientific Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis, Stroke 2011
Question 9 · Chest Imaging (Thoracic Radiology)
A 52-year-old woman has 18 months of worsening dyspnoea. CT pulmonary angiography shows eccentric thrombus adherent to and forming obtuse angles with the arterial wall, intraluminal webs and bands, abrupt narrowing of segmental arteries, mosaic attenuation with vessel-calibre variation between regions, and dilated bronchial arteries. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AAcute massive pulmonary embolism
- BChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
- CPulmonary artery sarcoma
- DFibrosing mediastinitis
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Eccentric wall-adherent thrombus with obtuse angles, webs and bands, abrupt vessel cut-offs and post-stenotic dilatation, mosaic perfusion with differential vessel calibre, and hypertrophied systemic bronchial collaterals are the defining features of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Acute embolus is typically central within the lumen, forms acute angles with the wall and expands the vessel. Pulmonary artery sarcoma usually fills and expands the main pulmonary artery with enhancement and extraluminal extension, and fibrosing mediastinitis causes soft-tissue encasement of mediastinal structures, often with calcification.
Reference: ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension (2022); Fleischner Society Statement on CTEPH imaging, Radiology (2021)
Question 10 · Contrast Media, Imaging Physics and Radiation Safety
A CT pulmonary angiogram in a large patient shows poor opacification of the segmental pulmonary arteries. The scanner is a dual-energy system. Which post-processing step is most likely to salvage the study?
- AReconstruct virtual monoenergetic images at a low keV, such as 40-50 keV
- BReconstruct virtual monoenergetic images at a high keV, such as 140 keV
- CReconstruct virtual non-contrast images from the spectral dataset
- DReconstruct with a sharp (bone) kernel at standard tube potential
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Reconstruct virtual monoenergetic images at a low keV, such as 40-50 keV
Low-keV virtual monoenergetic reconstructions sit close to the iodine K-edge (33.2 keV), so iodine attenuation and vascular contrast rise substantially, rescuing an underenhanced angiographic study (at the cost of increased image noise). High-keV images do the opposite, reducing iodine conspicuity while suppressing metal artefact; virtual non-contrast images deliberately subtract iodine; and a sharp kernel increases noise without improving vascular attenuation.
Reference: McCollough CH et al., Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches and Clinical Applications, Radiology, 2015
Question 11 · Cardiovascular Imaging
Cardiac MRI is performed in a patient with an apical left ventricular filling defect after anterior myocardial infarction, to determine whether it is thrombus or tumour. Which sequence is most useful for making this distinction?
- AFirst-pass perfusion imaging alone, since thrombus enhances avidly in the arterial phase
- BT2-weighted STIR imaging, on which thrombus is uniformly high signal
- CEarly gadolinium enhancement imaging with a long inversion time of around 550-600 ms, on which avascular thrombus appears homogeneously black while vascularised tissue does not null
- DCine SSFP imaging alone, on which thrombus is always higher in signal than myocardium
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Early gadolinium enhancement imaging with a long inversion time of around 550-600 ms, on which avascular thrombus appears homogeneously black while vascularised tissue does not null
Thrombus is avascular, so with a long inversion time it remains uniformly signal-void while perfused tumour or myocardium takes up contrast and appears bright, making this the most reliable discriminator. First-pass perfusion shows absent enhancement in thrombus, which is supportive but the long-TI technique is the accepted problem-solving sequence. T2 signal in thrombus is variable and depends on age, and cine SSFP alone cannot reliably separate mural thrombus from tumour or trabeculation.
Reference: SCMR Standardized Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols (Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2020)
Question 12 · Head and Neck Imaging
Nine months after chemoradiotherapy for a laryngeal carcinoma, a surveillance MRI shows diffuse symmetric mucosal enhancement and thickening, retropharyngeal oedema and subcutaneous fat stranding, plus a new 12 mm focal nodular enhancing lesion at the primary site with markedly reduced ADC. How should this be interpreted?
- AAll findings represent expected post-radiotherapy change; routine surveillance
- BDiffuse changes are radiation sequelae and the focal nodular lesion with restricted diffusion is suspicious for recurrence (NI-RADS 3), warranting biopsy
- CThe findings are typical of chondroradionecrosis and warrant conservative management only
- DThe pattern indicates a second primary tumour and warrants immediate total laryngectomy
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Diffuse changes are radiation sequelae and the focal nodular lesion with restricted diffusion is suspicious for recurrence (NI-RADS 3), warranting biopsy
Diffuse symmetric mucosal enhancement, retropharyngeal oedema and fat stranding are the expected sequelae of radiotherapy, whereas a new focal nodular enhancing mass with low ADC at the primary site is the hallmark of recurrence and corresponds to a NI-RADS 3 category, which mandates tissue sampling. Dismissing the nodule as post-treatment change risks missing salvageable recurrence. Chondroradionecrosis shows cartilage fragmentation, sclerosis and gas without a discrete enhancing nodule, and proceeding directly to laryngectomy without histological confirmation is inappropriate.
Reference: Aiken AH et al., ACR Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) (2018); NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Guidelines (2024)
Diagnostic Radiology reference books and guidelines
Every question in this bank names the textbook or guideline its answer rests on. These are the sources our Diagnostic Radiology questions cite most often - the reading list to revise from alongside the bank.
Textbooks
10- 1
ACR Manual on Contrast Media, American College of Radiology
2024 - 2
ACR BI-RADS Atlas
5th edition - 3
Donnelly, Fundamentals of Pediatric Imaging
2nd edition - 4
IASLC/AJCC TNM Classification of Lung Cancer
8th edition2017 - 5
Braunwald's Heart Disease
12th edition - 6
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
8th edition2017 - 7
Advanced Trauma Life Support
10th edition - 8
ACR Manual on MR Safety, American College of Radiology, edition (RF burns and SAR)
2024 - 9
WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
5th edition2021 - 10
Caffey's Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging
13th edition2019
Guidelines and standards
10- 1
NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Guidelines
2024 - 2
ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines: soft tissue and visceral sarcomas. Ann Oncol
2021 - 3
ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease
2021 - 4
British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline
2023 - 5
EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS), non-hepatic applications
2018 - 6
ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Right Lower Quadrant Pain - Suspected Appendicitis
2022 - 7
ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/SCMR expert consensus on multimodality imaging of cardiac amyloidosis
2019 - 8
SCMR T1 mapping and ECV consensus statement
2017 - 9
Joint Commission Sentinel Event Policy
2024 - 10
European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) recommendations on CEM
2022
Where your regulator publishes a reading list, use the editions it names. Exam questions are not taken from any one book.
Last reviewed September 2026
About these questions: every question is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team, written to the published blueprint, with a rationale and a reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.
Before you book your exam
Frequently asked questions
Are these real Diagnostic Radiology exam questions?
How many questions are in the Diagnostic Radiology bank?
What is the pass mark for the DHA Diagnostic Radiology exam?
How many questions are in the DHA Diagnostic Radiology exam, and how long is it?
How much does the DHA Diagnostic Radiology exam cost?
How many attempts do I get?
Which GCC regulators license the Diagnostic Radiology title?
How do I receive it?
Other specialty banks
Emergency Medicine
From 3 papers · ~160 Qs each
Psychiatry
From 3 papers · ~155 Qs each
Family Medicine
From 3 papers · ~155 Qs each
Ophthalmology
From 3 papers · ~145 Qs each
Consultant Diagnostic Radiology - Oral Assessment
Consultant oral pack · 14 scenarios
Still unsure whether you even need this exam?
Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.