Free Emergency Medicine mock test
25 original exam-style questions from our Emergency Medicine bank, timed at the exam’s own pace, scored against the 60% DHA pass mark. They span 13 of the 13 blueprint domains, so you will see exactly where you are weakest - free, no sign-up.
Sit 25 original exam-style questions at real exam pace
These are 25 original questions taken from our Emergency Medicine bank, spread across 13 of the 13 domains of the published blueprint. You get 72 seconds per question, which is exactly the pace of the real EME5531 exam (30 minutes for 25). At the end you will see which domains you are weakest in, and the full worked reasoning for every question.
- 25
- questions
- 30:00
- time limit
- 60%
- DHA pass mark
A short diagnostic cannot predict whether you will pass - only the real exam does that. It will show you, honestly, where you currently stand.
Quick answer
The Emergency Medicine exam at a glance
The Emergency Medicine licensing exam is a computer-based, multiple-choice test, and each GCC regulator sets its own. DHA, SCFHS, QCHP and OMSB publish exact figures, listed below. DOH licenses the title without a published written exam. This free mock gives you 25 original exam-style questions at 72 seconds each, scored against the 60% DHA pass mark, then shows your weakest domains.
Published exam figures
- DHA
Specialist Emergency Medicine (EME5531)
UAE150 MCQs3 hours60%
pass mark
- SCFHS
Saudi Classification Examination - Emergency Medicine
Saudi Arabia200 MCQs240 minutes65%
pass mark
- QCHP
Specialist Emergency Medicine
Qatar150 MCQs3 hours65%
pass mark
- OMSB
Omani Examination for Emergency Medicine (OEEM)
Oman100 MCQs150 minutes65%
pass mark
- Attempts in the UAE
- 3 in total across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA
- This free mock
- 25 questions · 30 minutes · 13 of 13 domains
- Full bank
- 480+ questions · 3 to 6 papers · AED 319
- Regulators
- DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, OMSB, DOH, MOHAP, SHA, NHRA and Kuwait MOH
How this free Emergency Medicine mock works
- 25
- original questions
- 30 min
- time limit
- 72s
- per question
- 13 of 13
- blueprint domains
- You get 72 seconds per question, the pace of a 150-question paper in 3 hours. The timer runs in your browser and ends the sitting when it reaches zero.
- Your score is set against the 60% DHA pass mark, the published figure for this exam. No other number is invented: there is no percentile and no pass probability.
- At the end you see your score, your pace per question, every domain ranked weakest first, and the worked answer and source for all 25 questions.
- You can mark each answer “sure” or “not sure”. Wrong answers you were sure about are shown first, because they are the ones you would not stop to check in the real exam.
- Your last result is saved in your own browser only, so you can come back and compare. Nothing is sent to us.
What the real Emergency Medicine licensing exam looks like
The Emergency Medicine exam is a computer-based multiple-choice paper, published by 4 regulators: DHA EME5531 (pass mark 60%), SCFHS (pass mark 65%), QCHP (pass mark 65%), OMSB OEEM (pass mark 65%). DOH license the title without a published written exam. Every regulator's format, pass mark and fee is in the table below; confirm yours before booking.
Pass marks at a glance: exam codes and pass marks by regulator for every written exam in one sourced table.
Before you can book the exam at all you need Dataflow primary source verification of your degree, licence and experience, which typically runs several weeks. Candidates often underestimate this and end up sitting the exam sooner after study than they planned. Check where you stand with our free eligibility checker or confirm whether your title even requires an exam using the Prometric exam checker.
You get three attempts in total across all UAE authorities, not three each, under the Unified Professional Qualification Requirements. At roughly AED 1,030 per attempt, plus the licensing delay each failure adds to your visa and start date, the cost of going in underprepared is not really the exam fee.
| Regulator | Exam | Format | Pass mark | Fee per attempt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Specialist Emergency Medicine (EME5531) | 150 MCQs in 3 hours | 60% | USD 280 (about AED 1,030) | |
Saudi Classification Examination - Emergency Medicine | 200 MCQs in 240 minutes | 65% | Not published | |
Specialist Emergency Medicine | 150 MCQs in 3 hours | 65% | Not published | |
Omani Examination for Emergency Medicine (OEEM) | 100 MCQs in 150 minutes | 65% | USD 220 (about OMR 80) | |
No written exam published Oral assessment, 45-60 minutes; no written exam (DOH Licensing Procedure Manual 2024) | Panel / review | Not published | Not published | |
MOHAP licensing exam Regulator-wide format | Computer-based | Not published | Not published | |
SHA licensing exam Regulator-wide format | Set at assessment | Not published | Not published | |
NHRA licensing exam Regulator-wide format | Prometric CBT | Not published | Not published | |
No exam published for this title Kuwait MOH publishes no exam for this title; check with the MOH | Not published | Not published | Not published |
Highlighted rows publish figures for this exact Emergency Medicine exam; the others show the regulator's general rules.
What is on the Emergency Medicine exam: the full blueprint
The published blueprint splits into 13 domains and 240 testable sub-topics. For each one you can see its weight, how many questions this mock asks on it, and about how many the full bank holds.
- Resuscitation, Shock and Airway Management13%
19 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 62 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Trauma, EMS, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine13%
18 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 62 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Cardiovascular and Respiratory Emergencies10%
19 sub-topics · 4 in this mock · about 48 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Toxicology and Environmental Emergencies8%
19 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 38 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Pediatric Emergencies8%
18 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 38 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Orthopedic and Musculoskeletal Emergencies7%
18 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 34 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Neurologic and Psychiatric Emergencies6%
18 sub-topics · 2 in this mock · about 29 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Emergencies5%
18 sub-topics · 2 in this mock · about 24 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies5%
18 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 24 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Endocrine, Metabolic, Electrolyte, Renal and Genitourinary Emergencies5%
19 sub-topics · 4 in this mock · about 24 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Hematologic and Oncologic Emergencies5%
18 sub-topics · 3 in this mock · about 24 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Infectious Disease, HEENT, Ophthalmology, Dermatology and Palliative/End-of-Life Care5%
18 sub-topics · 3 in this mock · about 24 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint
- Patient Safety, Professionalism, Ethics, Evidence and ED Operations10%
20 sub-topics · 1 in this mock · about 48 in the full bank
SCFHS official blueprint: Patient Safety 5% + Professionalism and Ethics 5%
Bank counts are estimates from the published weights the bank is written to, rounded.
This mock samples 13 of 13 domains. The full bank covers all 13 across 480+ questions.
See the full bank - AED 319How to use your mock score
These bands are set against the 60% DHA pass mark and match the verdict on your result screen. On 25 questions, a score near the pass mark has a 95% margin of error of about ±19 points, so treat the band as a direction, not a forecast.
Below the line
On this sample you would likely fall short of the 60% pass mark today. Do not book yet. Start with your two weakest domains from the result, then sit full-length papers until you clear the line with room to spare.
Close to the line
A few questions decide it. On a 160-question paper, every 1% is one or two questions, so drill your weakest domains and build a margin on timed papers before you book.
On track
Clear of the pass mark on this sample. 25 questions is a small sample, so confirm it over full-length timed papers before you book: stamina and pacing fail candidates who know the material.
Getting an honest score
- 1Sit it cold, once. Do not look anything up. A diagnostic you help yourself through tells you nothing. The number you get is only useful if it is honest.
- 2Read every rationale, especially the ones you got right. Getting a question right by elimination is not the same as knowing it. The worked reasoning is free, whether or not you buy anything.
- 3Work on your weakest domain first. The breakdown orders your domains worst first for exactly this reason. Studying what you are already good at feels productive and moves nothing.
- 4Re-sit under full exam conditions later. The real paper is much longer than 25 questions and stamina matters. The full bank's 3 to 6 papers are written for exactly this.
A worked Emergency Medicine exam question
Every question in the mock and in the paid bank is written to this standard: a clinical stem, four plausible options and the reasoning for the answer, with its source.
Resuscitation, Shock and Airway Management
A 48-year-old man with a large sublingual haematoma, limited mouth opening and reduced pulmonary compliance from pulmonary oedema requires airway management. Which mnemonic is specifically designed to predict difficulty with placement and ventilation via an extraglottic (supraglottic) airway device?
- AMOANS
- BLEMON
- CRODSCorrect
- DSHORT
Why: RODS (Restricted mouth opening, Obstruction/obesity, Distorted anatomy, Stiff lungs or cervical spine) predicts difficulty with extraglottic device placement and ventilation, and all four elements are relevant to this patient. MOANS (Mask seal, Obesity/obstruction, Age, No teeth, Stiff lungs) predicts difficult bag-mask ventilation, LEMON predicts difficult direct laryngoscopy, and SHORT (Surgery/disrupted anatomy, Haematoma, Obesity, Radiation, Tumour) predicts a difficult front-of-neck surgical airway.
Source: Walls RM, Murphy MF (eds). The Walls Manual of Emergency Airway Management, 5th edition, 2018
Emergency Medicine sample questions with answers
10 more original exam-style Emergency Medicine questions, worked in full. They are not real or recalled exam questions, and none of them is in the mock above or on the bank page, so sit the mock first if you have not.
Question 1 · Trauma, EMS, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
A 62-year-old man with a severe traumatic brain injury is intubated and ventilated. His GCS is 6, and the right pupil is now 6 mm and unreactive with new left-sided extensor posturing. Blood pressure is 150/85 mmHg and oxygen saturation is 98%. Neurosurgery is 30 minutes away. What is the most appropriate immediate management?
- AElevate the head of the bed to 30 degrees and give a bolus of hypertonic saline or mannitol
- BHyperventilate to a PaCO2 of 20-25 mmHg and continue until arrival of the neurosurgeon
- CAdminister intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg
- DAllow permissive hypotension with a target mean arterial pressure of 55 mmHg to reduce cerebral bleeding
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Elevate the head of the bed to 30 degrees and give a bolus of hypertonic saline or mannitol
This is uncal (transtentorial) herniation, and the immediate temporising measures are head-up positioning with a neutral neck, adequate sedation and analgesia, and hyperosmolar therapy with hypertonic saline or mannitol while urgent neurosurgical decompression is arranged. Aggressive prophylactic hyperventilation to a PaCO2 of 25 mmHg causes cerebral vasoconstriction and ischaemia and is reserved as a brief rescue at a target of about 30-35 mmHg. Corticosteroids increase mortality in traumatic brain injury (CRASH trial), and hypotension is one of the strongest predictors of poor outcome because it lowers cerebral perfusion pressure.
Reference: Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, 4th edition, Neurosurgery 2017; CRASH trial, Lancet 2004
Question 2 · Patient Safety, Professionalism, Ethics, Evidence and ED Operations
A single-centre study derives a new decision rule to exclude subarachnoid haemorrhage, reporting sensitivity 100% (95% CI 92-100%) and specificity 20% in 300 patients. Before this rule is adopted into routine emergency practice, what is the essential next step?
- AImmediate adoption, because a point estimate of 100% sensitivity guarantees no missed cases
- BProspective external validation in a different population and setting, followed by an impact analysis of its effect on practice and outcomes
- CRecalculation of the rule using the same dataset with different cut-points to improve specificity
- DA retrospective chart review at the same centre using the same investigators
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Prospective external validation in a different population and setting, followed by an impact analysis of its effect on practice and outcomes
Methodological standards for clinical decision rules require derivation, then prospective validation in a distinct population and setting to overcome overfitting and spectrum bias, then impact analysis before broad implementation. A sensitivity point estimate of 100% with a lower confidence limit of 92% is compatible with a clinically unacceptable miss rate in a condition as lethal as subarachnoid haemorrhage, so the confidence interval, not the point estimate, drives the decision. Re-fitting on the derivation dataset or repeating the work at the same centre with the same team does not provide independent validation.
Reference: Stiell IG, Wells GA, Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1999; McGinn TG et al, Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: clinical prediction rules, JAMA, 2000
Question 3 · Pediatric Emergencies
A 4-month-old infant who is not yet rolling or sitting is brought in with bruising over the left cheek and pinna and a torn upper labial frenulum. The caregivers give a changing account, initially attributing the injuries to a toy dropped by an older sibling and later to a fall from a bed. What is the most appropriate management?
- AAdmit for a full child-protection assessment including skeletal survey and neuroimaging, and notify the statutory child protection authority
- BReassure the caregivers and discharge with a head injury safety-netting leaflet
- CPerform a coagulation screen only and discharge the infant if it is normal
- DArrange routine outpatient paediatric follow-up in two weeks
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Admit for a full child-protection assessment including skeletal survey and neuroimaging, and notify the statutory child protection authority
Bruising in a non-ambulatory infant, injuries to the ear and cheek, a torn frenulum and an inconsistent or changing history are classic red flags for inflicted injury ('those who don't cruise rarely bruise'), and they mandate admission to a place of safety, a full evaluation including skeletal survey and neuroimaging for occult fractures and intracranial injury, and reporting to the statutory child protection body. Discharge in any form leaves the infant at risk of further and potentially fatal injury. A coagulation screen is part of the workup for a bleeding disorder but a normal result does not exclude abuse and cannot justify discharge.
Reference: American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Report: The Evaluation of Suspected Child Physical Abuse (2015); NICE guideline NG76: Child abuse and neglect (2017)
Question 4 · Neurologic and Psychiatric Emergencies
A 61-year-old man presents with continuous vertigo, nausea and gait unsteadiness that began 6 hours ago and persists at rest. He has spontaneous left-beating horizontal nystagmus. The head impulse test is normal bilaterally, there is no skew deviation, and the nystagmus does not change direction on gaze. How should the HINTS examination be interpreted?
- AA normal head impulse test in acute vestibular syndrome suggests a central cause such as posterior circulation stroke
- BThe findings are reassuring and consistent with vestibular neuritis
- CThe absence of skew deviation reliably excludes a central lesion
- DHINTS cannot be applied and a Dix-Hallpike manoeuvre should be performed instead
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. A normal head impulse test in acute vestibular syndrome suggests a central cause such as posterior circulation stroke
In the acute vestibular syndrome, a normal or negative head impulse test is the worrying result, because a peripheral vestibular lesion produces an abnormal test with a corrective saccade; a normal test implies an intact vestibulo-ocular reflex and points to a central cause. Any single reassuring component such as absent skew cannot exclude stroke, as all three components must be benign. HINTS is validated only in continuous acute vestibular syndrome, not in episodic positional vertigo, so Dix-Hallpike is the wrong test here and may in fact be misleading.
Reference: Kattah et al., HINTS to Diagnose Stroke in the Acute Vestibular Syndrome, Stroke 2009; AAN and ACEP dizziness guidance
Question 5 · Obstetric and Gynecologic Emergencies
A stable 30-year-old woman has a positive pregnancy test, minimal spotting and no pain. Beta-hCG is 900 mIU/mL and transvaginal ultrasound shows no intrauterine or adnexal findings and no free fluid. She is labelled a pregnancy of unknown location. Which of the following is the most appropriate disposition plan?
- ADischarge with clear return precautions and a repeat beta-hCG in 48 hours arranged with early pregnancy assessment follow-up
- BAdmit for emergency diagnostic laparoscopy
- CReassure her that the low beta-hCG excludes ectopic pregnancy and arrange routine antenatal booking
- DGive a single dose of methotrexate now and repeat beta-hCG on day 7
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Discharge with clear return precautions and a repeat beta-hCG in 48 hours arranged with early pregnancy assessment follow-up
A pregnancy of unknown location in a stable, minimally symptomatic patient is managed with serial beta-hCG at 48 hours plus explicit safety-netting and guaranteed early pregnancy unit follow-up, because the location may still prove intrauterine, ectopic or a failing pregnancy. Emergency laparoscopy is not justified without instability or diagnostic findings. A low beta-hCG does not exclude ectopic pregnancy, and empirical methotrexate before a diagnosis risks destroying a desired viable intrauterine pregnancy.
Reference: NICE Guideline NG126 (updated 2023); ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193 (reaffirmed 2022)
Question 6 · Hematologic and Oncologic Emergencies
A 58-year-old man with a large anterior mediastinal mass has stridor at rest, orthopnoea and cannot lie flat. He is tiring and requires an airway. Which approach is safest?
- AStandard rapid sequence intubation with propofol and rocuronium in the supine position
- BImmediate needle cricothyroidotomy
- CTransfer to theatre for an awake technique with the patient sitting, with ENT and cardiothoracic support and rigid bronchoscopy immediately available, after dexamethasone and heliox
- DNon-invasive ventilation with high inspiratory pressures on the ward
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Transfer to theatre for an awake technique with the patient sitting, with ENT and cardiothoracic support and rigid bronchoscopy immediately available, after dexamethasone and heliox
In critical central airway obstruction from a mediastinal mass, induction of anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade abolish the negative intrathoracic pressure and spontaneous respiratory effort that keep the airway patent, and can cause complete, irreversible airway and cardiovascular collapse. The safe strategy is an awake, spontaneously breathing technique in the sitting position in a controlled environment with surgical rescue by rigid bronchoscopy or cardiopulmonary bypass immediately available, with dexamethasone and heliox as temporising measures. A cricothyroidotomy is useless because the obstruction is distal to the cricothyroid membrane, and non-invasive ventilation cannot overcome a fixed intrathoracic obstruction.
Reference: Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the Management of Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Adults, 2015; Blank & de Souza, Anesthetic Management of Patients with an Anterior Mediastinal Mass, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2011
Question 7 · Resuscitation, Shock and Airway Management
A 63-year-old smoker presents with a three-month history of hoarseness and now has audible inspiratory stridor at rest, tripoding but maintaining saturations of 94% on oxygen. ENT reports a large supraglottic tumour partially obstructing the laryngeal inlet. He needs a definitive airway before theatre. What is the safest airway strategy?
- AStandard rapid sequence induction with rocuronium and direct laryngoscopy
- BDeep sedation with propofol and blind nasal intubation
- CAwake fibreoptic or awake video-laryngoscopic intubation under topical anaesthesia with a surgeon prepared for front-of-neck access
- DInsertion of a laryngeal mask airway after induction as the primary technique
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Awake fibreoptic or awake video-laryngoscopic intubation under topical anaesthesia with a surgeon prepared for front-of-neck access
In a patient with a known obstructing supraglottic lesion, spontaneous ventilation is the safety net; inducing anaesthesia and paralysing may collapse the airway and produce an immediate 'can't intubate, can't oxygenate' scenario that a supraglottic device cannot rescue because the obstruction is at or above the laryngeal inlet. An awake technique with topicalisation preserves ventilation while the airway is secured, with double set-up for front-of-neck access. Blind nasal intubation risks tumour trauma and haemorrhage.
Reference: Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for awake tracheal intubation in adults, Anaesthesia 2020; Frerk C et al. DAS 2015 guidelines, British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015
Question 8 · Cardiovascular and Respiratory Emergencies
A 55-year-old man with acute pulmonary embolism is normotensive (BP 128/78 mmHg) but has a raised troponin, a BNP of 480 pg/mL and an RV:LV diameter ratio of 1.2 on CT. He has no bleeding risk factors. What is the recommended initial management?
- ARoutine full-dose systemic thrombolysis for all such patients
- BDischarge on a direct oral anticoagulant with next-day follow-up
- CImmediate surgical embolectomy
- DAnticoagulation with close monitoring, reserving reperfusion for haemodynamic deterioration
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Anticoagulation with close monitoring, reserving reperfusion for haemodynamic deterioration
This is intermediate-high-risk (submassive) PE: right ventricular dysfunction plus positive biomarkers but preserved blood pressure. Guidelines advise anticoagulation with monitored observation and rescue reperfusion if haemodynamic decompensation occurs, because routine systemic thrombolysis in this group reduced decompensation but caused a significant excess of major and intracranial haemorrhage in the PEITHO trial. Surgical embolectomy is reserved for high-risk patients with failed or contraindicated thrombolysis, and early discharge applies only to low-risk patients (for example sPESI 0) without RV strain.
Reference: ESC Guidelines on Acute Pulmonary Embolism, European Heart Journal, 2019; Meyer et al., PEITHO trial, NEJM, 2014
Question 9 · Toxicology and Environmental Emergencies
In the same organophosphate-poisoned worker, the team is deciding about pralidoxime. Which statement best reflects correct use of oximes?
- APralidoxime should be given early because it reactivates acetylcholinesterase before irreversible ageing of the enzyme occurs, and it is given alongside, not instead of, atropine
- BPralidoxime replaces the need for atropine once the loading dose is complete
- CPralidoxime is the first-line agent for carbamate poisoning and should be given before atropine
- DPralidoxime should be delayed for 24 hours to allow spontaneous enzyme reactivation to be assessed
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Pralidoxime should be given early because it reactivates acetylcholinesterase before irreversible ageing of the enzyme occurs, and it is given alongside, not instead of, atropine
Oximes reactivate phosphorylated acetylcholinesterase only before ageing of the enzyme-inhibitor complex, so early administration matters, and pralidoxime is always an adjunct to atropine rather than a substitute because it does not reverse existing muscarinic overstimulation. Carbamates cause reversible, spontaneously hydrolysing carbamylation, so oximes are generally unnecessary and atropine remains the mainstay. Deliberate delay allows ageing to occur and forfeits any benefit.
Reference: Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th edition (2019), insecticides chapter; WHO recommendations on oxime therapy
Question 10 · Orthopedic and Musculoskeletal Emergencies
A 6-year-old boy fell from monkey bars onto an extended arm. He has a swollen elbow and a displaced extension-type supracondylar humerus fracture. He cannot make the 'OK' sign (unable to flex the interphalangeal joint of the thumb and the distal interphalangeal joint of the index finger). Which nerve is most likely injured?
- AUlnar nerve
- BPosterior interosseous nerve
- CAnterior interosseous nerve
- DSuperficial radial nerve
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Anterior interosseous nerve
The anterior interosseous nerve, a pure motor branch of the median nerve, is the most frequently injured nerve in extension-type (Gartland) supracondylar fractures, and its lesion produces exactly this inability to flex the thumb IP and index DIP joints with no sensory deficit. Ulnar nerve injury is more typical of flexion-type fractures and causes intrinsic weakness and small-finger sensory loss. Posterior interosseous injury causes finger drop without wrist drop, and the superficial radial nerve is purely sensory.
Reference: Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children, 9th edition, 2019; Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, 9th edition
Free mock vs the full Emergency Medicine bank
The mock tells you where you stand. The bank is how you close the gap.
| What you get | Free mock | Full bank |
|---|---|---|
| Questions | 25 | 480+ |
| Papers | 1 short timed set | 3 to 6 full-length papers, about 160 each |
| Blueprint coverage | 13 of 13 domains | All 13 domains, 240 sub-topics |
| Worked rationale | Every question | Every question |
| Reference | Every question | Every question |
| Timing | 30 minutes in your browser | Exam-length papers to sit against the clock |
| Format | Online, free | PDF sent to you, yours to keep |
| Price | Free | AED 319, paid once |
Full Emergency Medicine bank
Close your gaps before exam day
- 480+ original questions in 3 to 6 full-length papers
- A worked rationale and a reference on every question
- Prepared for your regulator's blueprint and pass mark
One-time price
AED 319
About a third of one exam fee (about AED 1,030 per attempt)
Unlock the full bank →No subscription · yours to keep
Frequently asked questions
Is this Emergency Medicine mock test really free?
Are these real Emergency Medicine exam questions?
What is the pass mark for the Emergency Medicine exam?
How long is the Emergency Medicine exam and how many questions?
What topics does the Emergency Medicine exam cover?
How is the full Emergency Medicine bank different from this mock?
What score should I aim for on this Emergency Medicine mock?
Does passing this mock mean I will pass the real exam?
Which regulators is this Emergency Medicine mock for?
How many attempts do I get at the real exam?
Other free mock exams in medicine
Keep going
From a 25-question mock to the full Emergency Medicine bank
480+ original questions in 3 to 6 full-length papers, each with a worked rationale and a reference, written to the same blueprint as the free mock on this page. One price: AED 319.