Neelim Healthcare Consulting
Neelim
Specialist & consultant · oral assessment

Specialist & Consultant Vascular Surgery oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Dialysis Access Surgery

A 68-year-old woman with diabetes on haemodialysis had a left brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula created 3 weeks ago at a Dubai hospital. She now has a cold, painful left hand during dialysis, numb fingers and a small ulcer on the tip of the index finger. The radial pulse is absent but becomes palpable when the fistula is compressed, and fistula flow is 1.4 L/min. How would you manage her?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing recognition and grading of access-induced hand ischaemia and the choice of a procedure that saves the hand while preserving the access where possible.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Vascular Surgery oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Vascular Surgery panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Vascular Surgery, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you can run a time-critical vascular emergency, such as rupture or acute ischaemia, with correct resuscitation priorities and the right first procedure.
  • •The panel is testing evidence-based choice between open and endovascular treatment, linked to named trials and current ESVS or ACC/AHA guidance.
  • •The panel is testing limb salvage decision-making that balances anatomy, infection, comorbidity and the patient's own goals, including the option of amputation.
  • •The panel is testing how you respond honestly to an iatrogenic injury caused by another team and protect accurate records under pressure from a colleague.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Vascular Surgery scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Rupture

A 74-year-old man with a known 6.1 cm abdominal aortic aneurysm, who postponed elective repair, collapses at home in Dubai with sudden back pain. In the emergency department he is alert, blood pressure 82/50 mmHg, pulse 118, haemoglobin 98 g/L and creatinine 140 micromol/L. CT angiography shows a ruptured infrarenal aneurysm with a left retroperitoneal haematoma, a 22 mm long neck and good iliac access. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing rapid decision-making in ruptured aneurysm: haemostatic resuscitation, choice of repair and anticipation of post-operative complications.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is a contained retroperitoneal rupture of an infrarenal aneurysm, and he is alive because the retroperitoneum is tamponading the bleed. Aggressive fluid raises pressure and dilutes clotting factors, so permissive hypotension is used while he remains alert. The ESVS 2024 guideline recommends endovascular repair as the first option when anatomy is suitable. IMPROVE showed similar early mortality with an endovascular-first strategy but faster discharge, better quality of life and a survival advantage by three years. A long neck makes him a good candidate. Threats after repair include abdominal compartment syndrome, colonic ischaemia, renal failure and limb ischaemia.

Management: I activate the ruptured aneurysm pathway: vascular consultant, anaesthetist, hybrid theatre team and the major haemorrhage protocol. While moving to theatre I accept a low systolic pressure as long as he is conscious, give blood products in balanced ratios and avoid crystalloid boluses. I place a femoral sheath under local anaesthesia, ready for an aortic occlusion balloon if he collapses, and avoid early general anaesthesia, which can precipitate cardiovascular collapse. I perform EVAR under local anaesthesia where possible. Afterwards in ICU I measure bladder pressure regularly and decompress by laparotomy if abdominal compartment syndrome develops. I watch lactate, urine output, limb perfusion and bloody diarrhoea that suggests colonic ischaemia, and correct coagulopathy and hypothermia. I would not transfer him unstable to another hospital. Follow-up includes CT surveillance for endoleak, statin and antiplatelet therapy, smoking cessation and screening advice for first-degree relatives.

Ethics and communication: If he has capacity, consent is brief but real: survival is not guaranteed and he may decline. If the family ask that he not be told how serious it is, I explain gently that he must understand to decide. I do not blame him for postponing surgery and record the facts neutrally. If repair is judged futile, I discuss palliation openly with him and his family.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which anatomical features make a ruptured aneurysm unsuitable for EVAR, and what would you do then?
  • How do you diagnose and manage abdominal compartment syndrome after EVAR?
  • When would you decide not to offer repair?
  • What are the types of endoleak and which need urgent treatment?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Aggressive crystalloid resuscitation to a normal blood pressure
  • Inducing general anaesthesia before aortic control is ready
  • Sending an unstable patient for further imaging or transfer
  • Ignoring abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia after repair

Reference: ESVS 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

Acute Limb Ischaemia

A 67-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation, who stopped her apixaban two weeks ago, presents to an Abu Dhabi hospital with a cold, painful right leg for 6 hours. The foot is pale with no popliteal or pedal pulses but a normal femoral pulse. She has reduced sensation beyond the toes and mild weakness of dorsiflexion. Handheld Doppler shows no pedal arterial signal but audible venous signals. The left leg is normal. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing Rutherford classification, the urgency it creates, the choice of revascularisation and recognition of reperfusion injury and compartment syndrome.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is acute limb ischaemia, most likely embolic given atrial fibrillation, interrupted anticoagulation, sudden onset and a normal contralateral limb, with a palpable femoral pulse suggesting a femoropopliteal embolus. Sensory loss beyond the toes with mild motor weakness and audible venous but absent arterial signals places her in Rutherford class IIb, immediately threatened and needing revascularisation within hours. Class IIa allows time for imaging and thrombolysis, while class III with paralysis and absent venous signals is irreversible. Differentials include thrombosis on atherosclerotic disease, popliteal aneurysm thrombosis and aortic dissection. The ESVS 2020 guideline supports immediate anticoagulation and urgent open or endovascular revascularisation.

Management: Immediately I give intravenous unfractionated heparin, typically a 5000 unit bolus then an infusion, with analgesia and fluids. I send full blood count, renal function, creatine kinase, coagulation and an ECG. Because she is class IIb, I take her straight to a hybrid theatre for femoral embolectomy with a Fogarty catheter, with on-table angiography and endovascular or bypass adjuncts if the outflow is not cleared. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is too slow for a limb with motor deficit. After reperfusion I assess the compartments repeatedly and perform four-compartment fasciotomy if compartment syndrome develops. I monitor potassium, acidosis, myoglobinuria and urine output. Over the next days she continues anticoagulation and has echocardiography for a cardiac source. Follow-up covers limb function and long-term anticoagulation adherence.

Ethics and communication: She has capacity, so I explain the risks of embolectomy, fasciotomy and amputation in plain language. I explore why she stopped anticoagulation without judgement, looking for cost, side effects or misunderstanding, and address it with her cardiologist. If a delay in referral caused harm, I disclose it honestly. Consent, timings and examination findings are documented clearly.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How would your management differ for a Rutherford IIa limb?
  • What are the signs of compartment syndrome, and how do you perform a four-compartment fasciotomy?
  • How would you manage acute thrombosis of a popliteal aneurysm?
  • What would you do if the embolectomy catheter retrieved no clot and the foot remained white?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Sending a IIb limb for thrombolysis or delayed imaging
  • Delaying heparin while awaiting investigations
  • Missing reperfusion hyperkalaemia and myoglobinuric kidney injury
  • Forgetting to look for and treat the embolic source

Reference: ESVS 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Limb Ischaemia; Sidawy and Perler, Rutherford's Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, 10th ed, 2022

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia and Diabetic Foot

A 58-year-old man with insulin-treated diabetes on haemodialysis presents to a Dubai clinic with a 4-week ulcer on the right hallux, surrounding erythema of 2.5 cm, a positive probe-to-bone test and night rest pain. Pedal pulses are absent, the ankle brachial index is 1.4 and toe pressure 22 mmHg. Duplex shows tibial occlusions with a patent popliteal artery. Temperature is 37.6 C and HbA1c 9.1 percent. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing staging of the threatened limb with WIfI, control of infection first, and a reasoned revascularisation strategy based on anatomy and patient risk.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is chronic limb-threatening ischaemia with diabetic foot infection and probable osteomyelitis of the hallux. The ankle brachial index is falsely raised by medial calcification, so toe pressure and waveforms are the reliable measures, and 22 mmHg indicates severe ischaemia. The Global Vascular Guidelines recommend staging with WIfI, here roughly wound 2, ischaemia 3 and foot infection 2, indicating high amputation risk and high benefit from revascularisation. Anatomy is graded with GLASS to guide endovascular versus bypass choice. Dialysis and tibial disease predict poorer outcomes. Infection must be controlled first or alongside revascularisation, because sepsis can destroy the foot within days.

Management: I admit him today, take deep tissue or bone samples and start empirical antibiotics covering Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, dosed for dialysis and guided by IWGDF/IDSA advice. I request plain films and MRI for osteomyelitis and examine for abscess. If there is an abscess or wet gangrene, urgent drainage or toe amputation comes first, within 24 to 48 hours. Within days, after angiography mapping tibial and pedal targets, I plan revascularisation: tibial angioplasty if the disease is focal or he lacks usable vein, or vein bypass if a good conduit and target exist and life expectancy is reasonable, informed by BEST-CLI. Wound care runs through a multidisciplinary foot team with offloading. I optimise glucose, statin and antiplatelet therapy. I would not perform a definitive minor amputation without first restoring flow. Follow-up includes surveillance, podiatry and footwear.

Ethics and communication: He needs time and clear information on limb salvage versus primary amputation, including realistic outcomes on dialysis. Decisions are his, and family join only if he wishes. Insurance approval must not delay urgent infection surgery, and I document my advocacy with the insurer. I offer psychological support given the burden of repeated procedures.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How does the WIfI classification change your decision?
  • When would you choose bypass over endovascular therapy, and what did BEST-CLI show?
  • How would you manage osteomyelitis of the first metatarsal head?
  • When would you recommend primary major amputation?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Relying on a normal or high ankle brachial index in a diabetic dialysis patient
  • Delaying drainage of foot sepsis to arrange revascularisation first
  • Performing a minor amputation without restoring perfusion
  • Treating the wound without a multidisciplinary foot team

Reference: Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, 2019; IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-Related Foot Infections, 2023

Carotid Disease and Stroke Prevention

A 71-year-old right-handed man in Sharjah had two 20-minute episodes of right-sided weakness and expressive dysphasia 4 days ago and is now neurologically normal. Duplex and CT angiography show an 80 percent left internal carotid stenosis with irregular plaque; the right side is normal. MRI shows a small acute left frontal infarct. He has hypertension, smokes and his LDL cholesterol is 3.8 mmol/L. He plans to fly home for a month next week. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing the urgency of intervention for symptomatic carotid stenosis, the choice between endarterectomy and stenting, and best medical therapy.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is recently symptomatic severe left carotid stenosis with a minor stroke. The risk of recurrent stroke is highest in the first days, and the benefit of endarterectomy shown in NASCET and ECST is greatest when surgery is early and falls sharply after two weeks. The ESVS 2023 guideline recommends endarterectomy for recently symptomatic 50 to 99 percent stenosis, ideally within 14 days of symptoms. Stenting is an alternative in selected patients, but procedural stroke risk is higher with stenting in the early period and in patients over 70. Best medical therapy is required whatever intervention is chosen.

Management: Today I start antiplatelet therapy according to the stroke team protocol, which may be short-term aspirin with clopidogrel after a minor stroke, together with a high-intensity statin, blood pressure control and smoking cessation support. I confirm the stenosis on a second modality and discuss him at the neurovascular meeting within 24 to 48 hours. I offer carotid endarterectomy this week, before his travel, under general or local anaesthesia with selective shunting and patch closure. After surgery I monitor neurological status, control blood pressure to prevent hyperperfusion syndrome, and watch for neck haematoma and cranial nerve injury. I would not defer surgery until after his trip without explaining the risk. Follow-up includes duplex, lipid targets and risk factor control.

Ethics and communication: He must understand that the procedural risk of stroke or death is small but real, and that delaying for travel increases his stroke risk, so the decision balances his priorities. If he still chooses to travel, I respect it, maximise medical therapy and give written stroke warning advice. Fitness to drive and fly after a stroke is addressed according to local rules and airline guidance.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How would you manage a patient who develops a new deficit two hours after endarterectomy?
  • When would you prefer stenting to endarterectomy?
  • What is your approach to a 70 percent asymptomatic stenosis?
  • How do you prevent and treat hyperperfusion syndrome?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Placing a recently symptomatic patient on a routine waiting list
  • Choosing early stenting in an older patient without justification
  • Neglecting statin, antiplatelet and blood pressure therapy
  • Missing post-operative neck haematoma with airway compromise

Reference: ESVS 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease

Patient Safety, Iatrogenic Injury and Disclosure

You are the on-call vascular surgeon. A 63-year-old woman had a coronary angiogram via the right femoral artery 6 hours ago. She now has a tense, expanding groin haematoma, haemoglobin falling from 128 to 91 g/L and blood pressure 96/60 mmHg. Duplex shows a wide-necked pseudoaneurysm arising high on the common femoral artery, and CT shows retroperitoneal extension. The cardiologist asks you to repair it and record it simply as a known complication, without mentioning the high puncture to the patient. How would you proceed?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing safe management of a bleeding femoral access complication and your response to a colleague's request to limit disclosure.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is a bleeding femoral access complication from a high puncture, which is associated with retroperitoneal haemorrhage because the artery above the inguinal ligament cannot be compressed against bone. Instability and a falling haemoglobin make ultrasound-guided compression or thrombin injection inappropriate; thrombin injection suits small, narrow-necked pseudoaneurysms in stable patients. The definitive option is open repair, with endovascular balloon tamponade or a covered stent reserved for selected cases because stenting the common femoral artery has drawbacks. Risk factors include antithrombotic therapy, female sex and high or low puncture. Being a recognised complication makes honest disclosure easier, not unnecessary.

Management: I resuscitate with blood products and adjust antithrombotic therapy only as far as cardiac safety allows, agreeing this with the cardiologist, then take her urgently to theatre. Through a groin incision, extended above the inguinal ligament if needed, I gain proximal control, repair the arterial defect, evacuate the haematoma and confirm distal pulses. Post-operatively I monitor haemoglobin, limb perfusion, femoral nerve function and the wound, and plan antiplatelet therapy for her coronary stent with cardiology. Within 24 hours I make sure she is told what happened, and I complete an incident report. I would not write a misleading operative note or omit the puncture site. The case goes to morbidity review to support measures such as ultrasound-guided puncture.

Ethics and communication: Honest disclosure of a complication is expected whether or not it was avoidable, and accurate records are a legal duty under Federal Decree-Law No. 4 of 2016 on Medical Liability. I decline the request respectfully, explain that disclosure protects the patient and both of us, and offer to speak to her together with the cardiologist. If he refuses, I escalate to the department head. I avoid blaming him in front of the patient.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • When is ultrasound-guided thrombin injection appropriate for a femoral pseudoaneurysm?
  • How would you manage an arteriovenous fistula found after femoral access?
  • What would you say if the patient asked whether someone made a mistake?
  • How would you handle a colleague who continues to ask you to alter records?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Attempting compression or thrombin injection in an unstable patient
  • Agreeing to a misleading operative note
  • Stopping antiplatelet therapy without discussing stent thrombosis risk
  • Criticising the colleague in front of the patient

Reference: Sidawy and Perler, Rutherford's Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, 10th ed, 2022

Aortic Dissection and Thoracic Aortic Disease

A 52-year-old taxi driver with untreated hypertension presents to an Abu Dhabi emergency department with sudden tearing interscapular pain. Blood pressure is 210/120 mmHg in both arms. CT angiography shows an aortic dissection starting beyond the left subclavian artery and extending to the iliac arteries, with a compressed true lumen. Two hours later he develops abdominal pain, a lactate of 4.2 mmol/L and an absent left femoral pulse. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing classification of aortic dissection, anti-impulse therapy and recognition of complicated dissection that needs urgent endovascular repair.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is acute type B dissection, now complicated by mesenteric and left leg malperfusion. Uncomplicated type B dissection is treated medically, but malperfusion, rupture, rapid expansion and refractory pain or hypertension define complicated dissection, for which the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline recommends thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) covering the primary entry tear. Mesenteric malperfusion carries high mortality and is time-critical. Mimics include myocardial infarction and pancreatitis, and extension into the ascending aorta must be excluded. The mechanism is usually dynamic true lumen collapse, which TEVAR corrects by redirecting flow into the true lumen.

Management: Immediately I admit him to a monitored bed, give opioid analgesia and intravenous beta-blockade such as esmolol or labetalol, aiming for a heart rate below 60 and systolic pressure below 120 mmHg, adding a vasodilator only after beta-blockade. Given malperfusion, I proceed to emergency TEVAR in a hybrid theatre, considering cerebrospinal fluid drainage for long coverage and left subclavian revascularisation if coverage threatens the vertebral or spinal circulation. After TEVAR I reassess visceral and limb perfusion, adding branch stenting if needed and laparotomy if lactate does not clear. Over the following days I watch for paraplegia, retrograde type A dissection and kidney injury. Long-term care includes strict blood pressure control, regular CT surveillance and genetic assessment if indicated. I would not manage complicated dissection with medical therapy alone.

Ethics and communication: Consent is obtained urgently but must include the risks of paraplegia, stroke and death, with an interpreter if needed. If he loses capacity, treatment proceeds under the emergency exception in UAE law. His occupation raises fitness to drive questions, which I address honestly in line with local rules. His family are updated promptly with his permission.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How would you manage uncomplicated type B dissection, and is there a role for early TEVAR?
  • How do you reduce the risk of spinal cord ischaemia during TEVAR?
  • What are high-risk imaging features in uncomplicated dissection?
  • How would you treat a retrograde type A dissection after TEVAR?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Giving a vasodilator before beta-blockade
  • Treating malperfusion with medical therapy alone
  • Failing to exclude ascending aortic involvement
  • Forgetting spinal cord protection with extensive coverage

Reference: 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease

Common reasons candidates fail the Vascular Surgery oral

  • ✕Resuscitating a ruptured aneurysm to a normal blood pressure with crystalloid
  • ✕Delaying revascularisation of a Rutherford IIb limb for thrombolysis or imaging
  • ✕Trusting the ankle brachial index in calcified diabetic or dialysis arteries
  • ✕Leaving a recently symptomatic carotid stenosis on a routine waiting list
  • ✕Managing complicated type B dissection with medical therapy alone
  • ✕Agreeing to minimise disclosure or alter the record of a complication

Vascular Surgery oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Rupture
  • Acute Limb Ischaemia
  • Aortic Dissection and Thoracic Aortic Disease
  • Carotid Disease and Stroke Prevention
  • Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia and Diabetic Foot
  • Consent, Amputation and Shared Decision-Making
  • Dialysis Access Surgery
  • Mesenteric and Renal Artery Disease
  • Patient Safety, Iatrogenic Injury and Disclosure
  • Resource Stewardship, Futility and End-of-Life Care
  • Upper Limb and Thoracic Outlet Disease
  • Vascular Graft and Endograft Infection
  • Vascular Trauma
  • Venous Disease and Venous Thromboembolism

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Vascular Surgery blueprint too, which covers:

  • Peripheral arterial disease and limb ischaemia
  • Aortic disease
  • Cerebrovascular and carotid disease
  • Venous disease and thromboembolism
  • Vascular trauma and emergencies
  • Vascular access, renal and visceral disease
  • Endovascular techniques, imaging and radiation safety
  • Vascular medicine and perioperative care
  • Diabetic foot, amputation, ethics and patient safety

Sitting the written exam as well? Vascular Surgery question bank or the free Vascular Surgery mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Vascular Surgery - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.