Neelim Healthcare Consulting
Neelim
Specialist & consultant · oral assessment

Specialist & Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgery oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Oesophageal Perforation and Benign Thoracic Surgery

A 45-year-old man vomits forcefully after a large meal at a family celebration in Ras Al Khaimah and develops severe left chest and upper abdominal pain. Eight hours later he is sweaty, temperature 38.4 C, pulse 120 and blood pressure 104/66 mmHg, with surgical emphysema in the neck. Chest radiograph shows a left pleural effusion and pneumomediastinum, and CT with oral water-soluble contrast shows a leak from the distal oesophagus into the left pleural space. How would you manage him?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing diagnosis of spontaneous oesophageal perforation and the principles of source control, drainage and nutrition in a time-critical thoracic emergency.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Cardiothoracic Surgery oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Cardiothoracic Surgery panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Cardiothoracic Surgery, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you recognise a cardiothoracic emergency such as type A dissection, tamponade or penetrating cardiac injury and move straight to the definitive operation.
  • •The panel is testing guideline-based timing of surgery, for example in endocarditis after stroke, and your ability to defend it within a multidisciplinary team.
  • •The panel is testing complete staging and fitness assessment before thoracic oncological resection, rather than operating on imaging alone.
  • •The panel is testing your leadership of goals-of-care discussions when mechanical support has no exit strategy, respecting faith, family and UAE law.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Cardiothoracic Surgery scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Thoracic Aortic Surgery and Acute Type A Dissection

A 58-year-old man is transferred to your Abu Dhabi cardiac centre with sudden chest pain radiating to the back 4 hours ago. Blood pressure is 150/70 mmHg in the right arm and 110/60 mmHg in the left, pulse 96. CT angiography shows a dissection flap from the aortic root to the iliac arteries, a 5.1 cm ascending aorta and a small pericardial effusion. Echo shows moderate aortic regurgitation. The referring team gave enoxaparin and clopidogrel for presumed acute coronary syndrome. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of acute type A dissection as a surgical emergency, pre-operative stabilisation and a consultant-level operative strategy.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is acute type A aortic dissection, DeBakey type I. Untreated early mortality is classically quoted at 1 to 2 percent per hour, mainly from rupture into the pericardium, coronary malperfusion, acute aortic regurgitation and stroke. The effusion and arm pressure difference signal tamponade risk and arch branch involvement. Emergency surgery is recommended by both the 2024 EACTS/STS and 2022 ACC/AHA guidelines. Antithrombotic therapy given for presumed coronary syndrome increases bleeding but does not contraindicate surgery. Malperfusion of brain, gut, kidneys or limbs must be assessed because it changes risk and sometimes the sequence of treatment.

Management: I accept him for emergency surgery and alert theatre, perfusion and anaesthesia at once. Meanwhile I give opioid analgesia and intravenous beta-blockade to keep systolic pressure around 100 to 120 mmHg and heart rate near 60, provided there is no tamponade physiology. I stop enoxaparin and prepare platelets, cryoprecipitate and plasma for the clopidogrel effect. I avoid pericardiocentesis unless he is in extremis, when only controlled small-volume drainage is used. In theatre I use axillary or central cannulation, hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion, resect the primary entry tear and replace the ascending aorta with an open distal anastomosis. I resuspend or replace the aortic valve depending on root pathology, extending to the arch only when indicated. Afterwards I watch for bleeding, stroke, malperfusion and kidney injury. Follow-up includes lifelong imaging of the residual aorta and strict blood pressure control.

Ethics and communication: If he has capacity, consent is urgent but honest about substantial operative mortality, stroke and paraplegia, and that death is likely without surgery. If he wishes, I involve family by phone without delaying surgery. The missed diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment are reported through the incident system in a learning spirit, not a blaming one.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • When would you perform a total arch replacement or frozen elephant trunk in acute type A dissection?
  • How would you manage a patient with established mesenteric malperfusion at presentation?
  • When would you choose a valve-sparing root replacement?
  • Would you operate on an 84-year-old with a type A intramural haematoma?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Delaying surgery for a coronary angiogram
  • Blind large-volume pericardiocentesis in a stable patient
  • Refusing surgery because of recent antithrombotic therapy
  • Not assessing malperfusion before and after repair

Reference: 2024 EACTS/STS Guidelines for Diagnosing and Treating Acute and Chronic Syndromes of the Aortic Organ; 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease

Cardiac Tamponade and Post-Cardiotomy Emergencies

A 66-year-old woman is 7 hours after elective triple coronary bypass grafting in your cardiac ICU. Chest drain output was 250 mL per hour for 3 hours and has suddenly stopped. She is now hypotensive at 78/50 mmHg on rising noradrenaline, pulse 125, central venous pressure 19 mmHg, urine output 10 mL per hour and lactate 5.1 mmol/L. Activated clotting time is normal and platelets 98. A limited bedside echo shows a posterior collection compressing the right atrium. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of post-operative tamponade, the threshold and technique for emergency re-sternotomy, and team leadership in the cardiac ICU.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is cardiac tamponade after cardiac surgery. It typically arises from clot after bleeding, with the drains themselves blocked by clot. Post-operative tamponade is often localised, so classic signs and transthoracic echo can mislead, and a high index of suspicion is needed when drainage stops abruptly with rising filling pressures and falling output. Differentials include ventricular failure, graft occlusion, vasoplegia and tension pneumothorax, which are excluded quickly at the bedside. The STS expert consensus on resuscitation after cardiac surgery supports emergency re-sternotomy within about 5 minutes of arrest from tamponade or bleeding, performed in the ICU.

Management: Immediately I call the senior team, anaesthetist and perfusionist and open the emergency re-sternotomy set. Meanwhile I give fluid and blood and correct coagulopathy with targeted products, guided by viscoelastic testing if available, rather than chasing pressure with vasopressors. If she deteriorates further or arrests, I re-open the chest in the ICU under sterile conditions without waiting for theatre, following the STS protocol. If she stabilises, I take her to theatre immediately for re-exploration, evacuate clot, control the bleeding source and check graft flow. I would not rely on stripping drains or wait for a formal echo while she declines. Afterwards I monitor drain output, haemodynamics, lactate and renal function, and review antiplatelet timing. Every return to theatre is recorded and audited.

Ethics and communication: She is sedated and cannot consent, so emergency re-exploration proceeds in her interests under the emergency provisions of UAE law. Her family are told promptly and honestly that bleeding has compressed the heart and that she has returned to theatre. I document timings and decisions clearly. Unit re-exploration rates are monitored as quality indicators, not hidden.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Describe the steps of an emergency re-sternotomy in the ICU.
  • How does the cardiac surgical arrest protocol differ from standard advanced life support?
  • What threshold of drain output prompts re-exploration in your practice?
  • How would you manage persistent vasoplegia after the chest is re-opened?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Increasing vasopressors while missing tamponade
  • Waiting for theatre availability in a peri-arrest patient
  • Trusting a normal transthoracic echo after cardiac surgery
  • Not correcting coagulopathy alongside surgical haemostasis

Reference: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus for the Resuscitation of Patients Who Arrest After Cardiac Surgery, 2017; Sellke, del Nido and Swanson, Sabiston and Spencer Surgery of the Chest

Infective Endocarditis Surgery

A 34-year-old man with a history of injecting drug use is admitted to a Dubai hospital with three weeks of fever. Blood cultures grow methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Transoesophageal echo shows a 16 mm mobile vegetation on the anterior mitral leaflet with severe regurgitation, and he is breathless at rest. Yesterday he developed left arm weakness, and CT shows a small right parietal infarct without haemorrhage. The medical team asks whether surgery should wait four weeks because of the stroke. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing indications and timing of surgery in infective endocarditis, especially after embolic stroke, and endocarditis team working.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is native mitral endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus, complicated by heart failure from severe regurgitation, a large mobile vegetation and an embolic ischaemic stroke. The 2023 ESC guidelines recommend surgery for heart failure caused by severe regurgitation, emergently or urgently according to severity, and urgent surgery for vegetations of 10 mm or more with embolism. After an ischaemic stroke without haemorrhage, surgery that is indicated should not be delayed provided coma is absent, whereas intracranial haemorrhage usually warrants postponement. Mycotic aneurysm should be sought. The risk of further embolism is highest early in treatment.

Management: Immediately I continue full-dose flucloxacillin or cefazolin, optimise heart failure therapy and present him to the endocarditis team with cardiology, infectious diseases, neurology and neuroradiology. I request brain MRI or CT angiography to exclude haemorrhage and mycotic aneurysm. If these are clear, I plan surgery within days, aiming for mitral repair where tissue allows, which is preferable in a young patient at risk of reinfection, or replacement after radical debridement. Post-operatively the antibiotic course is counted from surgery if valve cultures are positive, with dental review and a search for other emboli. I would not delay surgery four weeks because of a small ischaemic infarct. Follow-up includes echocardiography, addiction services and education about relapse and reinfection.

Ethics and communication: Drug use must not influence the decision to offer surgery, which rests on clinical criteria. I discuss honestly the higher risk of reinfection if injecting continues and offer support rather than judgement. Drug use is confidential health information shared only on a need-to-know basis. I refer him to addiction services with his consent, and any legal reporting follows UAE law and facility policy.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • When would you delay surgery after a neurological event?
  • How do you decide between repair and replacement in active endocarditis?
  • How would you manage a periannular abscess on the aortic valve?
  • Would you offer a second operation if he reinfects a prosthetic valve after relapse?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Automatically delaying surgery after a small ischaemic stroke
  • Not excluding intracranial haemorrhage or mycotic aneurysm
  • Letting moral judgement about drug use drive the decision
  • Deciding alone instead of through an endocarditis team

Reference: 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Endocarditis

Lung Cancer Surgery and Staging

A 68-year-old man with a 40 pack-year smoking history is referred to a thoracic clinic in Abu Dhabi with a 3.2 cm spiculated right upper lobe mass. PET-CT shows avid uptake in the mass and a 9 mm right lower paratracheal node with SUV 4.1, without distant disease. Biopsy shows adenocarcinoma. FEV1 is 58 percent and DLCO 46 percent of predicted, and he climbs two flights of stairs slowly. He asks you to operate next week. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing invasive mediastinal staging, physiological assessment of fitness for resection and treatment selection within a multidisciplinary team.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is non-small cell lung cancer, provisionally T2a with possible N2 disease. PET-avid mediastinal nodes have a meaningful false-positive rate, so tissue confirmation by EBUS-TBNA, followed by mediastinoscopy if negative and suspicion remains, is required before treatment is decided. Molecular testing for EGFR, ALK and PD-L1 is now needed even in resectable disease because perioperative immunotherapy and adjuvant targeted therapy change outcomes. With FEV1 and DLCO below 80 percent, the ERS/ESTS algorithm calls for cardiopulmonary exercise testing. A peak oxygen uptake above 20 mL/kg/min indicates lobectomy is safe, while below 10 mL/kg/min indicates high risk.

Management: First I explain that operating next week without staging could mean the wrong treatment. Within two weeks he has EBUS-TBNA of the paratracheal and subcarinal stations, molecular profiling, brain MRI and cardiac risk assessment. I arrange cardiopulmonary exercise testing and smoking cessation support, and present him at the thoracic multidisciplinary meeting. If he is N0 or N1 and fit, I offer VATS or robotic lobectomy with systematic nodal dissection, with stereotactic radiotherapy if he proves unfit. If N2 is confirmed, he is considered for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and resection, or definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab. Post-operatively I use enhanced recovery, early mobilisation and physiotherapy. Follow-up includes surveillance CT and adjuvant therapy decisions.

Ethics and communication: I respect his anxiety but explain that correct staging protects him from an operation that may not help. Prognosis is discussed truthfully at the pace he chooses, and family involvement follows his wishes. Surgery is not withheld because he still smokes, but I explain how stopping reduces complications. Costs of molecular tests and immunotherapy are discussed transparently with him and his insurer.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you calculate predicted postoperative FEV1 and DLCO?
  • When is sublobar resection appropriate?
  • How would you manage a prolonged air leak on day 6?
  • What would you do if a single-station N2 node were found unexpectedly at surgery?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Operating on PET findings alone without mediastinal tissue
  • Omitting molecular testing in resectable disease
  • Declaring him unfit on spirometry without exercise testing
  • Deciding treatment without the multidisciplinary team

Reference: ERS/ESTS Clinical Guidelines on Fitness for Radical Therapy in Lung Cancer Patients, 2009; NICE Guideline NG122, Lung Cancer: Diagnosis and Management

Consent, Futility and Withdrawal of Mechanical Support

A 61-year-old man underwent emergency coronary bypass for cardiogenic shock, could not be weaned from bypass and was placed on peripheral veno-arterial ECMO. On day 9 echo shows no meaningful myocardial recovery; he has anuric kidney injury on dialysis, has had ischaemic bowel resected, and CT shows a large stroke that excludes transplant or a durable ventricular assist device. His wife and sons ask that everything continue, saying only God decides the time of death. How would you handle this?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you can recognise when mechanical support no longer offers benefit and lead a compassionate, lawful, culturally sensitive goals-of-care discussion.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Post-cardiotomy ECMO is a bridge to recovery, durable support or transplant, never a destination. The 2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS consensus emphasises defining the goal before and during support and recognising when no exit strategy exists. Here there is no recovery, no candidacy for transplant or a ventricular assist device, multiorgan failure and a large stroke, so continuing support prolongs dying while exposing him to bleeding, infection and limb complications. Futility is a clinical judgement made by the team, ideally with a second consultant opinion, not a unilateral decision. Many families in the region see withdrawal as hastening death, so the distinction between not escalating and withdrawing, and the applicable UAE rules, matter.

Management: First I confirm the picture through a multidisciplinary review with intensive care, cardiology, neurology and a second cardiac surgeon, documenting that there is no exit strategy. I then meet the family in a quiet room with an intensivist, a nurse and a professional interpreter if needed, offering religious support such as an imam or chaplain. I explain the facts simply, listen to their beliefs and do not present the decision as theirs to carry. I agree a plan that excludes escalation such as further surgery, ensures comfort and dignity, and sets a review point. Any decision on withdrawal or do-not-resuscitate orders follows UAE law and facility policy, which may require several physicians to agree and document. If agreement cannot be reached, I seek ethics committee review and offer a second opinion rather than acting unilaterally.

Ethics and communication: Respect for the family's faith is compatible with not offering treatments that cannot help. A consistent message and careful documentation protect patient, family and team. I would not mislead them about prognosis or apply pressure. Staff distress after prolonged futile support is acknowledged and debriefed.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What exit strategies should be defined when post-cardiotomy ECMO is started?
  • How would you respond if a son threatened to complain to the regulator?
  • Who should be present at the family meeting and why?
  • How would your approach differ if the patient had written an advance directive?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Withdrawing support unilaterally without the required agreement and documentation
  • Offering further surgery or escalation to avoid a difficult conversation
  • Using medical jargon or leaving the decision entirely to the family
  • Dismissing religious beliefs instead of engaging with them

Reference: 2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS Expert Consensus on Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients

Chest Trauma

A 24-year-old man reaches an Al Ain emergency department 15 minutes after a stab wound at the left parasternal fourth intercostal space. He is agitated, blood pressure 74/50 mmHg and pulse 132, with distended neck veins and muffled heart sounds. Breath sounds are equal. eFAST shows a pericardial effusion with right ventricular diastolic collapse and no pneumothorax. Ten minutes later he loses his radial pulse with organised electrical activity on the monitor. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of penetrating cardiac injury with tamponade, the indications for resuscitative thoracotomy and the operative technique.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is penetrating cardiac injury with tamponade, the right ventricle being most often injured by a parasternal wound. Tamponade may limit exsanguination at first but rapidly causes obstructive shock, and loss of pulse with organised electrical activity is traumatic cardiac arrest from a reversible cause. The EAST guideline strongly recommends emergency department thoracotomy for pulseless patients with penetrating thoracic injury who arrive with signs of life, the group with the best survival. Pericardiocentesis is at best temporising and must not delay surgery. Associated lung, internal mammary or great vessel injury and haemothorax should be anticipated.

Management: Before arrest, the right move is immediate transfer to theatre for sternotomy, with blood products through the massive transfusion protocol and permissive hypotension. Once he loses output, I perform a resuscitative left anterolateral thoracotomy in the department, extended into a clamshell if needed. I open the pericardium longitudinally anterior to the phrenic nerve, evacuate clot and control the wound with a finger. I close it with pledgeted sutures, using horizontal mattress sutures beneath any adjacent coronary artery. Internal cardiac massage and descending aortic cross-clamping are used if needed. Once output returns, he goes to theatre for formal repair, washout and assessment of other injuries. Afterwards echo checks for septal or valve injury, and I monitor for post-pericardiotomy syndrome and infection. I would not continue prolonged closed chest compressions instead of releasing the tamponade.

Ethics and communication: He cannot consent, so the emergency exception applies. Police will be involved because of the assault, so I preserve evidence and share information only through the facility's formal process. The family is updated honestly. Thoracotomy carries sharp injury risk to staff, so experienced operators, protective equipment and post-exposure follow-up are essential.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Which patients should not have an emergency department thoracotomy?
  • How would you manage a stab wound in the cardiac box in a stable patient?
  • What would you do if a coronary artery were lacerated?
  • How would your approach differ for blunt trauma with arrest?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Persisting with closed chest compressions in tamponade
  • Delaying surgery for repeated pericardiocentesis
  • Opening the pericardium across the phrenic nerve
  • Placing sutures that occlude a coronary artery

Reference: EAST Practice Management Guideline on Patient Selection for Emergency Department Thoracotomy, 2015; American College of Surgeons, Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Student Course Manual, 10th ed, 2018

Common reasons candidates fail the Cardiothoracic Surgery oral

  • ✕Sending a type A dissection for coronary angiography before surgery
  • ✕Escalating vasopressors after cardiac surgery while missing tamponade
  • ✕Automatically delaying endocarditis surgery after a small ischaemic stroke
  • ✕Resecting lung cancer on PET findings without mediastinal tissue staging
  • ✕Withdrawing or continuing ECMO without a documented team decision and exit plan
  • ✕Continuing closed chest compressions in traumatic tamponade instead of thoracotomy

Cardiothoracic Surgery oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Adult Congenital and Paediatric Cardiac Surgery
  • Aortic Valve Disease and Heart Team Decisions
  • Cardiac Tamponade and Post-Cardiotomy Emergencies
  • Chest Trauma
  • Consent, Futility and Withdrawal of Mechanical Support
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
  • Infective Endocarditis Surgery
  • Lung Cancer Surgery and Staging
  • Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery
  • Oesophageal Perforation and Benign Thoracic Surgery
  • Patient Safety, Outcomes Monitoring and Team Conduct
  • Pleural Disease and Empyema
  • Postoperative Critical Care and Mechanical Circulatory Support
  • Thoracic Aortic Surgery and Acute Type A Dissection

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Cardiothoracic Surgery blueprint too, which covers:

  • Anatomy of the Thorax
  • Cardiac and Pulmonary Physiology
  • Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Pharmacology
  • Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Valvular Heart Disease
  • Diseases of Lung and Mediastinum
  • Congenital Heart Diseases
  • Interpretation of Common Lab Tests
  • Radiology of Thorax
  • Monitoring of Cardiac Patient
  • Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation
  • Arrhythmias and Conduction Defects
  • Post-Operative Care of Cardiac Patient

Sitting the written exam as well? Cardiothoracic Surgery question bank or the free Cardiothoracic Surgery mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgery - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.