Neelim Healthcare Consulting
Neelim

Free DHA Gastroenterology mock test

25 original exam-style questions from our Gastroenterology bank, timed at the exam’s own pace, scored against the 65% DHA pass mark. They span 13 of the 13 blueprint domains, so you will see exactly where you are weakest - free, no sign-up.

Free diagnosticNo sign-up · no email · results instantly

Sit 25 original exam-style questions at real exam pace

These are 25 original questions taken from our Gastroenterology bank, spread across 13 of the 13 domains of the published blueprint. You get 72 seconds per question, which is exactly the pace of the real GES5171 exam (30 minutes for 25). At the end you will see which domains you are weakest in, and the full worked reasoning for every question.

25
questions
30:00
time limit
65%
DHA pass mark

A short diagnostic cannot predict whether you will pass - only the real exam does that. It will show you, honestly, where you currently stand.

What the real Gastroenterology licensing exam looks like

Candidates for a Gastroenterology licence in the UAE sit a computer-based multiple-choice examination - DHA exam code GES5171, delivered through Prometric for DHA, MOHAP and SHA, and through Pearson VUE for DOH Abu Dhabi. The DHA pass mark is 65% (DHA CBT Guideline, May 2026); other authorities set their own, so confirm yours before booking. The result is reported to you as pass or fail only - your score is never released.

Pass marks at a glance: DHA exam codes and pass marks for all written exams in one sourced table.

The paper is built to a published blueprint, which is why a domain-by-domain diagnostic is more useful than a raw percentage. Your questions above were drawn from across Viral Hepatitis, Acute Liver Injury and Transplantation, Oesophageal Diseases, Endoscopy Practice, Sedation and Procedural Complications (Miscellaneous), Gastric and Duodenal Diseases and Helicobacter pylori and 9 more - the same areas the real paper weights.

Before you can book the exam at all you need Dataflow primary source verification of your degree, licence and experience, which typically runs several weeks. Candidates routinely underestimate this and end up sitting the exam sooner after study than they planned. Check where you stand with our free eligibility checker or confirm whether your title even requires an exam using the Prometric exam checker.

You get three attempts in total across all UAE authorities - not three each - under the Unified Professional Qualification Requirements. At roughly AED 1,030 per attempt, plus the licensing delay each failure adds to your visa and start date, the cost of going in underprepared is not really the exam fee.

What is on the Gastroenterology exam: the full blueprint

The published blueprint splits into 13 domains and 255 testable sub-topics. The diagnostic above samples across them, which is why its breakdown maps onto the structure the real paper is built from.

  • Oesophageal Diseases~8%19 topics

    part of the SCFHS/DHA published section 'Oesophageal and Gastric Diseases' at 14%; split here for granularity - est.

  • Gastric and Duodenal Diseases and Helicobacter pylori~6%19 topics

    remainder of the SCFHS/DHA 'Oesophageal and Gastric Diseases' 14% section - est. split

  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding~15%20 topics

    SCFHS/DHA published section: 15%

  • Pancreatic Diseases~8%20 topics

    part of the SCFHS/DHA published section 'Pancreaticobiliary Diseases' at 15%; split here for granularity - est.

  • Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Disease~7%19 topics

    remainder of the SCFHS/DHA 'Pancreaticobiliary Diseases' 15% section - est. split

  • Chronic Liver Disease, Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension~13%20 topics

    part of the SCFHS/DHA published section 'Liver and Liver Related Conditions and Diseases' at 25%; split here for granularity - est.

  • Viral Hepatitis, Acute Liver Injury and Transplantation~10%20 topics

    remainder of the SCFHS/DHA 'Liver and Liver Related Conditions and Diseases' 25% section - est. split

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease~4%20 topics

    part of the SCFHS/DHA published section 'Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Small and Large Intestine' at 6%; SCFHS Fellowship promotion blueprint weights IBD at 25% - est. split for the licensure paper

  • Small and Large Intestine Disorders (non-IBD)~3%20 topics

    remainder of the SCFHS/DHA 'Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Small and Large Intestine' 6% section - est. split

  • Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Malignancies~9%20 topics

    SCFHS/DHA published section 'Gastrointestinal Malignancies': 9%

  • GI Motility, Functional GI Disorders and Nutrition~6%19 topics

    SCFHS/DHA published section 'Gastroenterology Nutrition Motility Disorders': 6%

  • Endoscopy Practice, Sedation and Procedural Complications (Miscellaneous)~4%19 topics

    est. - the DHA exam coverage list includes a 'Miscellaneous' heading and names Cotton & Williams Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy as a core reference; not a separately weighted SCFHS section

  • Patient Safety, Professionalism, Ethics and Evidence-Based Practice~10%20 topics

    SCFHS/DHA published: Patient Safety 5% + Professionalism and Ethics 5%; the SCFHS Fellowship blueprint instead embeds these across domains

Questions
~150 (DHA Specialist Gastroenterology, code GES5171 - CONFIRMED). SCFHS Gastroenterology classification exam is 200 MCQs. SCFHS Adult Gastroenterology Fellowship Promotion Examination is not less than 100 MCQs plus up to 10% unscored pretest items. QCHP/NHRA/MOHAP specialty papers are typically ~150. DOH and OMSB gastroenterology question counts are unverified.
Duration
3 hours (DHA - CONFIRMED, and the stated duration is inclusive of registration and process introduction). SCFHS classification exam 4 hours. NHRA 3-hour seating with about 2.5 hours of exam time. QCHP typically 3 hours. DOH and OMSB durations vary by classification and are unverified.
Pass mark
65% (DHA Specialist Gastroenterology - CONFIRMED; higher than the 60% DHA default applied to many other titles). SCFHS 65% Registrar / 70% Senior Registrar. SCFHS Fellowship promotion bands: <50% Clear Fail, 50-59.4% Borderline Fail, 60-69.4% Borderline Pass, >70% Clear Pass. NHRA 60%. QCHP 60% general with 65% on several specialty papers. OMSB reported >65% to qualify for the viva (unverified). DOH/MOHAP gastroenterology cut scores unverified.

Single-best-answer MCQs with one correct option out of four (SCFHS states this explicitly for the Adult Gastroenterology paper). Items are predominantly clinical vignettes and include image-based stems: endoscopic and colonoscopic views, capsule endoscopy frames, ERCP and MRCP images, EUS stills, abdominal CT/MRI, liver and GI histopathology slides, oesophageal manometry and pH-impedance tracings, and liver function / serology panels. Question types span clinical presentation (history, examination findings, patient approach), diagnosis and investigation, management (therapeutic and non-therapeutic, plus complications of management), materials and instruments (device properties, usage and selection - relevant to endoscopic accessories, stents and scopes), and health maintenance (screening, prevention, risk factor assessment, prognosis). SCFHS mixes K1 recall/comprehension items with K2 interpretation, analysis, reasoning and decision-making items. Delivery: DHA/MOHAP/SCFHS/QCHP/NHRA through Prometric; DOH and OMSB through Pearson VUE. DHA reports Pass/Fail only through Sheryan and does not release a numeric score. SCFHS may lower the pass score incrementally to reach a target pass rate but never below the stated floor, and allows +/-3% (classification) or +/-5% (fellowship) variation per blueprint category. Where an oral assessment applies (DHA Consultant Gastroenterology, SCFHS consultant classification interview, OMSB viva), it is a separate additional hurdle; DHA clause 4.19.2 requires the CBT to be passed first where both are required for a profession.

A worked Gastroenterology exam question

Every question in the diagnostic and in the paid bank is written to this standard: a clinical stem, four plausible options and the reasoning for the answer, with its source.

Viral Hepatitis, Acute Liver Injury and Transplantation

A patient develops liver injury 5 weeks after starting a new drug. ALT is 8 times the upper limit of normal and ALP is 1.2 times the upper limit of normal. Which pattern does this represent and what is the corresponding R value?

  1. ACholestatic pattern, R = 0.15
  2. BHepatocellular pattern, R = 6.7Correct
  3. CMixed pattern, R = 3
  4. DHepatocellular pattern, R = 0.9

Why: The R value is calculated as (ALT / ULN of ALT) divided by (ALP / ULN of ALP), giving 8 / 1.2 = 6.7 here. An R value of 5 or above defines a hepatocellular pattern, 2 to 5 a mixed pattern, and 2 or below a cholestatic pattern. The other options either miscalculate the ratio or misassign the pattern threshold.

Source: ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury (American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021)

Gastroenterology sample questions with answers

10 more original exam-style Gastroenterology questions, worked in full. They are not real or recalled exam questions, and none of them is in the diagnostic above, so sit that first if you have not.

  1. Question 1 · Chronic Liver Disease, Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

    A 41-year-old man with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis has completed seven days of prednisolone 40 mg daily. His bilirubin has risen and the Lille score is 0.68. He remains free of sepsis and has strong family support with documented abstinence since admission. What is the most appropriate management?

    1. ADiscontinue corticosteroids and refer for assessment in a structured early liver transplantation programme
    2. BContinue prednisolone for the full 28-day course as planned
    3. CSwitch to pentoxifylline for a further 28 days
    4. DAdd N-acetylcysteine and continue steroids for another three weeks
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A. Discontinue corticosteroids and refer for assessment in a structured early liver transplantation programme

    A Lille score of 0.45 or more at day 7 identifies corticosteroid non-response; continuing steroids in these patients confers no survival benefit and increases infection risk, so they should be stopped. Selected non-responders with a favourable psychosocial assessment can be considered for early liver transplantation without a mandatory fixed period of abstinence, an approach validated in prospective cohorts. Switching to pentoxifylline after steroid failure has been shown not to improve outcome, and N-acetylcysteine is only ever an adjunct given with steroids from the outset, not a rescue for established non-response.

    Reference: EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of alcohol-related liver disease, Journal of Hepatology 2018; Mathurin P et al. Early liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis, New England Journal of Medicine 2011

  2. Question 2 · Patient Safety, Professionalism, Ethics and Evidence-Based Practice

    A 45-year-old man with acute liver failure is ventilated in ICU. Following formal testing he fulfils brain death criteria. The family, citing religious concerns, asks whether continuing ventilation is obligatory. Which response is most consistent with mainstream Islamic bioethical rulings applied in the GCC?

    1. AConfirmed brain death, established by the legally recognised procedure, is regarded as death, and continued ventilation is not obligatory
    2. BVentilation must be continued until spontaneous cardiac standstill occurs in all cases without exception
    3. CWithdrawal of ventilation after brain death is regarded as active euthanasia and is prohibited
    4. DThe decision rests entirely with the treating physician and the family's views are not to be sought
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A. Confirmed brain death, established by the legally recognised procedure, is regarded as death, and continued ventilation is not obligatory

    The Islamic Fiqh Academy has accepted irreversible cessation of all brain function, properly certified, as constituting death, so continued mechanical support after confirmation is not religiously obligatory. Withdrawing support in that setting is discontinuation of futile treatment on a deceased person rather than euthanasia. Family communication and consent processes remain integral to practice in GCC institutions, so excluding the family is neither ethically nor procedurally correct.

    Reference: Islamic Fiqh Academy (OIC) Resolution No. 17 (5/3), 1986; national brain death determination protocols in GCC states

  3. Question 3 · Oesophageal Diseases

    A 47-year-old man on long-term high-dose oxycodone for chronic back pain develops dysphagia and chest pain. Endoscopy is normal. High-resolution manometry shows an elevated median integrated relaxation pressure with premature contractions and a distal latency of 3.9 seconds. What is the most appropriate initial management?

    1. AImmediate peroral endoscopic myotomy
    2. BBotulinum toxin injection into the lower oesophageal sphincter
    3. CWithdrawal or substitution of the opioid and repeat manometry
    4. DEmpirical trial of a tricyclic antidepressant
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: C. Withdrawal or substitution of the opioid and repeat manometry

    Chronic opioid use produces opioid-induced oesophageal dysfunction, which mimics type III achalasia or oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction with impaired sphincter relaxation and premature spastic contractions; the abnormalities frequently resolve after the opioid is stopped. Chicago Classification v4.0 explicitly advises considering opioid effect before diagnosing a primary spastic disorder. Proceeding directly to myotomy or botulinum toxin risks an unnecessary irreversible intervention, and neuromodulators do not address the causative drug.

    Reference: Yadlapati R et al. Chicago Classification version 4.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; Ratuapli SK et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2015

  4. Question 4 · Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Disease

    A 45-year-old woman with known PSC develops worsening pruritus, jaundice and two episodes of cholangitis. MRCP shows a new dominant stricture of the common hepatic duct. Which statement about her management is most accurate?

    1. AHigh-dose ursodeoxycholic acid at 28-30 mg/kg/day should be started as it improves transplant-free survival
    2. BLong-term indwelling metal stenting is the treatment of choice for dominant strictures
    3. CBrushings and/or cholangioscopic biopsy should be taken to exclude cholangiocarcinoma, and short-term balloon dilation is generally preferred over routine stenting
    4. DDominant strictures in PSC are almost always malignant, so surgical resection should be arranged without tissue sampling
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: C. Brushings and/or cholangioscopic biopsy should be taken to exclude cholangiocarcinoma, and short-term balloon dilation is generally preferred over routine stenting

    A new dominant stricture in PSC mandates exclusion of cholangiocarcinoma with brushings (with FISH) and/or cholangioscopy-directed biopsy, and randomised data show that short-term balloon dilation gives outcomes at least as good as stenting with fewer adverse events. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid (28-30 mg/kg/day) was associated with worse outcomes in a randomised trial and is not recommended, indwelling metal stents are inappropriate in benign PSC strictures, and although malignancy must be excluded most dominant strictures prove benign.

    Reference: EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis (2022); Lindor et al., high-dose UDCA randomised trial (Hepatology, 2009); ESGE guidance on biliary strictures

  5. Question 5 · GI Motility, Functional GI Disorders and Nutrition

    A 20-year-old woman with a BMI of 13.8 kg/m2 and a 3-year history of severe food restriction presents with early satiety, bloating and constipation, and is found to have delayed gastric emptying. She also reports intermittent postprandial vomiting and abdominal pain, and CT shows a narrow aortomesenteric angle. What is the most appropriate management priority?

    1. AUrgent duodenojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome
    2. BLong-term prokinetic therapy with a gastric emptying study repeated every 3 months
    3. CMultidisciplinary supervised nutritional rehabilitation and weight restoration with refeeding precautions, since both the delayed gastric emptying and the aortomesenteric narrowing are usually reversible consequences of malnutrition
    4. DPlacement of a percutaneous gastrostomy to bypass the delayed gastric emptying
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: C. Multidisciplinary supervised nutritional rehabilitation and weight restoration with refeeding precautions, since both the delayed gastric emptying and the aortomesenteric narrowing are usually reversible consequences of malnutrition

    Severe malnutrition itself causes delayed gastric emptying and loss of the mesenteric fat pad producing a narrow aortomesenteric angle, so both findings are typically secondary and reversible with careful weight restoration; management priority is multidisciplinary nutritional rehabilitation with refeeding syndrome precautions and psychiatric input. Operating for SMA syndrome before nutritional rehabilitation exposes the patient to major surgical risk for a reversible problem. Prokinetics do not address the underlying restriction, and a gastrostomy is an unnecessary invasive intervention when the stomach empties normally once weight is restored.

    Reference: AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Disordered Eating and Eating Disorders in Patients with GI Symptoms, Gastroenterology 2022; NICE Guideline NG69: Eating Disorders, 2017

  6. Question 6 · Endoscopy Practice, Sedation and Procedural Complications (Miscellaneous)

    After a serious perforation during a routine colonoscopy, the endoscopy unit convenes a review. Which approach best reflects modern patient safety governance?

    1. AIdentify the individual endoscopist responsible and issue a formal disciplinary warning to deter recurrence
    2. BRecord the event in the complications logbook without further analysis, since perforation is a recognised risk of the procedure
    3. CSuspend all colonoscopy in the unit until an external regulator completes an inquiry
    4. DConduct a structured root cause analysis within a just-culture framework, examining system and human factors, generating actionable system changes, feeding findings into the morbidity and mortality meeting, and disclosing openly to the patient
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: D. Conduct a structured root cause analysis within a just-culture framework, examining system and human factors, generating actionable system changes, feeding findings into the morbidity and mortality meeting, and disclosing openly to the patient

    Just culture distinguishes system failure and honest error from reckless behaviour and uses structured root cause analysis with M&M review to produce system-level improvements, coupled with open disclosure to the patient. Blame-first responses suppress reporting and learning; documenting without analysis wastes the learning opportunity; and blanket service suspension is a disproportionate response to a recognised procedural complication.

    Reference: WHO Patient Safety Curriculum Guide; SCFHS Essentials of Patient Safety; ASGE quality indicators for GI endoscopic procedures, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015

  7. Question 7 · Gastrointestinal Bleeding

    A 70-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily presents with massive melaena, a haemoglobin of 5.9 g/dL and persistent hypotension despite transfusion. Her last dose was 4 hours ago and her creatinine clearance is 40 mL/min. Which specific reversal agent is indicated?

    1. AVitamin K 10 mg intravenously
    2. BIdarucizumab
    3. CAndexanet alfa
    4. DFour-factor prothrombin complex concentrate as the agent of choice
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B. Idarucizumab

    Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment that binds dabigatran with very high affinity and is the specific reversal agent for life-threatening dabigatran-associated bleeding. Andexanet alfa reverses the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban, not dabigatran. Prothrombin complex concentrate is only a non-specific fallback when idarucizumab is unavailable, and vitamin K has no effect on direct oral anticoagulants.

    Reference: Pollack CV et al., NEJM 2017 (RE-VERSE AD); ACG-CAG Guideline on Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets During Acute GI Bleeding, 2022

  8. Question 8 · Viral Hepatitis, Acute Liver Injury and Transplantation

    A 44-year-old man has acute liver failure from a non-paracetamol cause. Which combination best fulfils the King's College criteria for emergency liver transplantation in non-paracetamol acute liver failure?

    1. AArterial pH <7.30 after adequate fluid resuscitation
    2. BINR >6.5 (prothrombin time >100 s) alone, or any three of: age <10 or >40 years, unfavourable aetiology, jaundice-to-encephalopathy interval >7 days, INR >3.5, bilirubin >300 micromol/L
    3. CCreatinine >300 micromol/L with grade III-IV encephalopathy
    4. DSerum lactate >3.5 mmol/L 4 hours after fluid resuscitation
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B. INR >6.5 (prothrombin time >100 s) alone, or any three of: age <10 or >40 years, unfavourable aetiology, jaundice-to-encephalopathy interval >7 days, INR >3.5, bilirubin >300 micromol/L

    The non-paracetamol King's College criteria are an INR above 6.5 alone, or any three of the five listed variables (extremes of age, unfavourable aetiology such as drug-induced or seronegative hepatitis, jaundice-to-encephalopathy interval exceeding 7 days, INR above 3.5, and bilirubin above 300 micromol/L). Arterial pH below 7.30, the combination of creatinine, INR and encephalopathy grade, and the lactate variants all belong to the paracetamol arm of the criteria.

    Reference: O'Grady et al., Gastroenterology 1989 (King's College criteria); EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on acute (fulminant) liver failure (2017)

  9. Question 9 · Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Malignancies

    A patient with a metastatic, somatostatin receptor-positive grade 2 midgut neuroendocrine tumour has progressive disease and worsening symptoms despite an adequately dosed long-acting somatostatin analogue. Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET shows intense uptake in all lesions. What is the most appropriate next therapeutic option?

    1. APeptide receptor radionuclide therapy with lutetium-177 DOTATATE
    2. BSwitch to a proton pump inhibitor and dietary serotonin restriction
    3. CCisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy
    4. DImmune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy with pembrolizumab
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with lutetium-177 DOTATATE

    The NETTER-1 trial established lutetium-177 DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as effective in progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive midgut neuroendocrine tumours, and intense DOTATATE uptake confirms suitability. Platinum-etoposide is reserved for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Checkpoint inhibitors have limited activity in well-differentiated NETs, and dietary measures do not control tumour progression.

    Reference: Strosberg et al., NETTER-1 trial, New England Journal of Medicine (2017); ENETS Consensus Guidelines (2023)

  10. Question 10 · Pancreatic Diseases

    A 52-year-old man with painful chronic pancreatitis has a main pancreatic duct dilated to 8 mm throughout, with multiple strictures and stones, and no inflammatory head mass. He has already had two courses of endoscopic therapy with only transient benefit. What does randomised evidence suggest is the best next option?

    1. AFurther repeated endoscopic stenting, as it is equivalent to surgery over the long term
    2. BSurgical pancreaticojejunostomy (Puestow-type drainage), which gives superior long-term pain relief
    3. CBilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy as the preferred definitive procedure
    4. DTotal pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation as the standard next step
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B. Surgical pancreaticojejunostomy (Puestow-type drainage), which gives superior long-term pain relief

    Randomised trials comparing endoscopic therapy with surgical drainage in obstructive chronic pancreatitis with a dilated duct have consistently favoured surgery for durable pain relief and fewer subsequent procedures, and surgical drainage is recommended after failed endoscopic therapy. Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy is rarely used and gives inconsistent results. Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation is reserved for selected patients with small-duct disease refractory to all other measures, and it renders the patient surgically diabetic and pancreatic-insufficient.

    Reference: Cahen DL et al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis (N Engl J Med, 2007); Issa Y et al. ESCAPE randomised trial (JAMA, 2020)

Last reviewed September 2026. About these questions: every item is original, written to the published blueprint, with a rationale and a reference, and no recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

How to use this diagnostic properly

  1. 1Sit it cold, once. Do not look anything up. A diagnostic you help yourself through tells you nothing. The number you get is only useful if it is honest.
  2. 2Read every rationale - especially the ones you got right. Getting a question right by elimination is not the same as knowing it. The worked reasoning is free above, whether or not you buy anything.
  3. 3Work weakest domain first. The breakdown orders your domains worst-first for exactly this reason. Studying what you are already good at feels productive and moves nothing.
  4. 4Re-sit under full exam conditions later. The real paper is far longer than this and stamina matters. Full-length timed papers are what the paid bank is for.

Frequently asked questions

Is this Gastroenterology mock exam really free?
Yes. All 25 questions, your score, the domain breakdown and the full worked answers are free, with no sign-up and no email required. The paid bank is a separate, much larger set of 510 questions.
Are these real Gastroenterology exam questions?
No. They are original questions written to the official Gastroenterology blueprint and drawn from our full bank - not leaked or recalled items, which would breach exam security and are frequently out of date. They follow the exam's format and domain weighting.
What is the pass mark for the Gastroenterology exam?
65% for the DHA Gastroenterology exam (GES5171), as published in the DHA CBT Guideline, May 2026. Other authorities set their own pass marks, so confirm yours before booking. DHA reports only pass or fail - your actual score is never released to you, which is why a diagnostic like this is useful for seeing where you stand.
Does passing this mock mean I will pass the real exam?
No, and we will not claim otherwise. 25 questions cannot predict a full-length paper. What it does reliably show is which blueprint domains you are currently weakest in.
How many attempts do I get at the real exam?
Three in total across all UAE authorities under the Unified Professional Qualification Requirements - not three per authority. Each attempt costs roughly AED 1,030.
What topics does the Gastroenterology exam cover?
The published blueprint splits into 13 domains covering 255 testable sub-topics: Oesophageal Diseases, Gastric and Duodenal Diseases and Helicobacter pylori, Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Pancreatic Diseases, Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Disease, Chronic Liver Disease, Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension, Viral Hepatitis, Acute Liver Injury and Transplantation, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Small and Large Intestine Disorders (non-IBD), Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Malignancies, GI Motility, Functional GI Disorders and Nutrition, Endoscopy Practice, Sedation and Procedural Complications (Miscellaneous), Patient Safety, Professionalism, Ethics and Evidence-Based Practice. The full weighting table is on this page.
How long is the Gastroenterology exam and how many questions?
~150 (DHA Specialist Gastroenterology, code GES5171 - CONFIRMED). SCFHS Gastroenterology classification exam is 200 MCQs. SCFHS Adult Gastroenterology Fellowship Promotion Examination is not less than 100 MCQs plus up to 10% unscored pretest items. QCHP/NHRA/MOHAP specialty papers are typically ~150. DOH and OMSB gastroenterology question counts are unverified.. Duration: 3 hours (DHA - CONFIRMED, and the stated duration is inclusive of registration and process introduction). SCFHS classification exam 4 hours. NHRA 3-hour seating with about 2.5 hours of exam time. QCHP typically 3 hours. DOH and OMSB durations vary by classification and are unverified.. Question count, duration and pass mark vary by authority and must be confirmed against the current candidate bulletin.
Do I need to create an account to take this mock exam?
No. There is no sign-up, no email capture and no payment. The questions, your score, the domain breakdown and the full worked answers are all free, and nothing is held back behind a form.

Other free mock exams in medicine