Neelim Healthcare Consulting
Neelim
Consultant title · oral assessment

Consultant Family Medicine oral assessment prep

14 panel-style scenarios with model answers structured in the three graded domains - knowledge, management, and ethics & communication.

Pass / fail panel14 scenarios
AED 699one-time
About 68% of one exam fee
Request this question bank

Tell us your authority and we send the bank for that exam, usually the same day.

What is riding on this exam

~AED 1,030
DHA exam fee, per attempt
Paid again on every re-sit. Other regulators' fees are in the table below.
3
UAE attempts - in total
Shared across DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SHA, not three each. Saudi, Qatar, Oman and Kuwait rules are in the FAQ.
Pass / fail
Panel decision
Judged by the panel, not a percentage. Formats differ by authority.

One failed attempt costs you the fee again, plus months of delay on your licence, your visa and your start date. This pack costs about 68% of one exam fee.

Every regulator: format, pass marks and fees for all GCC licensing exams, each from the regulator's own documents.

Try a scenario from this pack

An original scenario, written the way a panel would put it to you.

Scenario 1Elderly Care and Polypharmacy

An 83-year-old woman is brought by her son after her third fall in two months, the last one at night on the way to the bathroom. She lives with family in Ras Al Khaimah, has type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis and insomnia, and takes 11 medicines, including glibenclamide, amlodipine, doxazosin, bendroflumethiazide, zolpidem, amitriptyline and tramadol. Her lying blood pressure is 142/78 and standing 112/64 after three minutes, with dizziness. Her HbA1c is 6.1% and she had two capillary glucose readings below 4 mmol/L last week. How would you approach her care?

What the panel is assessing

The panel is testing a structured multifactorial falls assessment and safe deprescribing in an older person with polypharmacy.

Liked those? The full pack has 14 scenarios at this standard - every one with a model answer.

Get the full pack - AED 699

What's inside

  • ✓14 original panel-style scenarios
  • ✓Model answer in all three graded domains
  • ✓Likely panel follow-up probes
  • ✓The pitfalls that fail candidates
  • ✓4+ ethics, consent and error-disclosure cases
  • ✓How each authority runs its oral

How the consultant Family Medicine oral is run, by authority

Consultant applicants who are not exempt are usually assessed by a panel rather than a computer exam. The format differs by authority.

AuthorityFormatLengthPanel and result
DHA - DubaiNot less than five clinical scenarios in your specialtyRoughly 20-30 minutesAt least two panellists, one pass or fail decision
DOH - Abu Dhabi5-6 case scenarios, including an ethical case45-60 minutesHeld on Microsoft Teams
SCFHS - Saudi ArabiaStructured consultant interview built on clinical casesTwo sessions of roughly 30 minutesSenior consultants in your specialty
OMSB - OmanViva on specialty cases, taken after the written examNot publishedRequired of every candidate

QCHP and NHRA assess most applicants by written exam and may add an interview or clinical assessment case by case. Your own eligibility notice is the final word on your route.

What a Family Medicine panel is assessing

Scenarios are judged across three domains: clinical knowledge, management, and ethics and communication. In Family Medicine, that looks like this:

  • •The panel is testing whether you pick out the red flag inside a routine primary care consultation, such as pale stools in a jaundiced baby or iron deficiency in an older man, and refer on the right pathway the same day.
  • •The panel is testing whether you manage long-term conditions to current outcome-based evidence, choosing drugs for cardiorenal benefit and setting explicit targets rather than chasing a single number.
  • •The panel is testing whether you stabilise an emergency safely with the limited equipment of a clinic, know which drugs help or harm before transfer, and hand over clearly.
  • •The panel is testing whether you balance confidentiality, consent, family involvement and public health duties in GCC family practice while staying within UAE law and facility policy.

How to structure an oral answer

  1. 1Say what it is and why it is dangerous. Open with the working diagnosis, the one or two alternatives you must exclude, and what will harm the patient first.
  2. 2Show the knowledge that changes the decision. Name the finding, test or trial result your plan rests on. Panels mark reasoning, not recitation.
  3. 3Manage in time order. What you do in the next ten minutes, the next hour and the next day, who you escalate to, and what would make you change course.
  4. 4Close on ethics and communication. Consent or capacity, the family conversation, disclosure if something went wrong, and what you document. Every authority examines this domain.

Worked Family Medicine scenario outlines

6 original scenarios from the pack, written the way a panel would put them to you. Each outline shows the opening of the model answer in all three domains, the follow-up questions to expect and the mistakes that fail candidates.

Cardiometabolic and Chronic Disease Management

A 49-year-old man with type 2 diabetes for eight years attends your Al Ain family medicine clinic for review. He had a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction two years ago and takes metformin 1 g twice daily, gliclazide 80 mg twice daily, atorvastatin 20 mg, ramipril 5 mg and aspirin. His HbA1c is 9.2%, BMI 34, blood pressure 146/88, LDL cholesterol 2.6 mmol/L, eGFR 54 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine albumin to creatinine ratio 42 mg/mmol. How would you optimise his care?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing whether you prescribe for cardiorenal outcomes, not only glucose, and set a structured, prioritised plan for a very high-risk patient.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: He has type 2 diabetes with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage G3a A3 and obesity, which makes him very high cardiovascular risk. Current guidelines recommend an SGLT2 inhibitor with proven kidney and cardiovascular benefit regardless of HbA1c, and a GLP-1 receptor agonist with proven cardiovascular benefit, which also helps weight. Albuminuria at this level calls for maximally tolerated renin-angiotensin blockade, and finerenone can add renal and cardiovascular benefit. His LDL target is below 1.4 mmol/L with at least a 50% reduction from baseline. Gliclazide carries hypoglycaemia risk that is more relevant during fasting and as renal function falls.

Management: Today I would add an SGLT2 inhibitor such as empagliflozin 10 mg, with sick-day advice to pause it during vomiting, dehydration or acute illness. I would increase atorvastatin to 80 mg and add ezetimibe if LDL remains above target after six weeks. I would titrate ramipril to 10 mg if potassium and creatinine allow, checking them within two weeks. I would start a GLP-1 receptor agonist such as semaglutide, titrating the dose gradually, and reduce or stop gliclazide as glycaemic control improves. I would consider finerenone once he is on maximal renin-angiotensin blockade with normal potassium. I would aim for blood pressure below 130/80 and set an individualised HbA1c target around 7%. I would arrange retinal and foot screening, dietitian support and Ramadan advice, and review him in three months.

Ethics and communication: I would agree priorities with him, because adding several medicines at once without his understanding damages adherence and trust. I would discuss costs and insurance coverage openly, since some agents may not be covered. I would document the shared decision and any treatment he declines, and avoid blaming him for previous control.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why would you start an SGLT2 inhibitor when his eGFR is 54?
  • What would you do if his eGFR fell by 20% after starting it?
  • How do you choose between a GLP-1 receptor agonist and insulin here?
  • How would you advise him about fasting during Ramadan?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Choosing agents only to lower HbA1c without considering cardiorenal benefit
  • Accepting an LDL of 2.6 mmol/L in a patient with prior myocardial infarction
  • Stopping an SGLT2 inhibitor for a small expected fall in eGFR
  • Not checking potassium and creatinine after changing renin-angiotensin blockade

Reference: American Diabetes Association, Standards of Care in Diabetes; KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease; 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Diabetes

Child Health and Immunisation

A mother brings her five-week-old son, born at term after an uneventful pregnancy, for his routine check. She says he is still yellow, but her own mother has told her this is normal for breastfed babies and she has been placing him in the morning sun. He is feeding well. On examination he is jaundiced, the liver edge is palpable 2 cm below the costal margin, and his nappy contains pale, putty-coloured stool with dark urine. His newborn screening results were normal. What would you do?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in a well-looking infant as a time-critical referral for possible biliary atresia.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: Jaundice beyond 14 days in a term baby is prolonged and must be investigated rather than attributed to breastfeeding. Pale stools and dark urine point to conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia, and biliary atresia is the diagnosis that must not be missed because outcomes after the Kasai portoenterostomy are best when it is done early, ideally before about 45 to 60 days of age. A conjugated bilirubin above 25 micromol/L warrants urgent referral. Other causes include alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, infection, hypothyroidism, galactosaemia, Alagille syndrome and cystic fibrosis. Breast milk jaundice is unconjugated and never causes pale stools.

Management: I would send total and conjugated bilirubin today, with liver function tests, a full blood count and urine for infection. I would look for dysmorphism, a murmur, splenomegaly and bruising. I would not wait for results before calling the paediatric team, and I would refer the same day to a paediatric hepatology or gastroenterology service for ultrasound and further work-up. Because cholestasis causes vitamin K malabsorption, I would make sure he has had vitamin K and ask the team to check his clotting, given the risk of bleeding. I would advise stopping sun exposure, which does not treat this jaundice. I would document the referral, confirm by telephone that he will be seen within days, and give safety-net advice about bleeding or lethargy.

Ethics and communication: As he is a minor, consent is given by his guardian, and I would explain the concern honestly to both parents, including why speed matters, without causing unnecessary alarm. I would respect the grandmother's role in the family while gently correcting the misconception. I would document the advice given.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why is age at Kasai surgery important?
  • What investigations would the paediatric hepatology team perform?
  • How would you manage a jaundiced two-week-old with normal stool colour?
  • What role does G6PD deficiency play in neonatal jaundice in this region?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Labelling prolonged jaundice as breast milk jaundice without a split bilirubin
  • Not asking about or inspecting stool and urine colour
  • Routine referral with an appointment weeks away
  • Forgetting vitamin K and the bleeding risk in cholestasis

Reference: NICE Clinical Guideline CG98, Jaundice in Newborn Babies Under 28 Days; Fawaz R et al, Guideline for the Evaluation of Cholestatic Jaundice in Infants: Joint Recommendations of NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN (Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2017)

Mental Health in Primary Care

A 32-year-old woman is tearful at her baby's eight-week immunisations. She tells you she has hardly slept, feels she is a bad mother and that her family would be better off without her. Her PHQ-9 score is 22 with a positive answer to the self-harm question. On direct questioning she has thought about taking an overdose of her mother-in-law's tablets, but she has not made a plan, and she denies thoughts of harming the baby. She is breastfeeding. How would you manage her?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing structured suicide risk assessment, recognition of severe postnatal depression and the decision on urgency of psychiatric referral.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is severe postnatal depression with suicidal ideation, and suicide is a leading cause of maternal death in the year after birth. I would screen for features of postpartum psychosis, such as confusion, mood swings, delusions or hallucinations, which would need emergency admission. Risk factors to explore include previous depression or self-harm, limited support, domestic abuse, substance use and access to means. Asking directly about suicide does not increase risk. Sertraline is generally preferred in breastfeeding because little passes into breast milk, but medicine alone is not enough at this severity.

Management: I would continue the conversation in private, take a full risk assessment, and judge her current risk as high enough to need same-day assessment by the perinatal or general psychiatry service. I would contact them while she is with me and agree who will take her there. With her consent, I would involve her husband or a trusted relative to stay with her and remove access to medicines. I would offer sertraline 50 mg once daily, starting lower if needed, and arrange psychological therapy. I would agree a written safety plan with crisis contacts. If she refused assessment and I judged the risk to be immediate, I would seek emergency psychiatric assessment. I would review her within a week, alert her obstetric and health visiting teams, and check that the baby's care is safe.

Ethics and communication: Confidentiality is important, but serious risk to her life justifies sharing necessary information with the psychiatric team and, if needed, with family. Involuntary admission is only possible under Federal Law No. 10 of 2019 on Mental Health when a mental disorder and serious risk are both present, so I would try to engage her voluntarily first. I would document my assessment and decisions in detail.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • How do you distinguish postnatal depression from postpartum psychosis?
  • What would change if she said she had thought about harming the baby?
  • Why do you choose sertraline in breastfeeding?
  • Her husband asks you not to tell anyone because of family reputation. How do you respond?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Not asking directly about suicidal plans and access to means
  • Prescribing an antidepressant and reviewing in four weeks
  • Missing features of postpartum psychosis
  • Sharing information with family without consent when risk does not require it

Reference: NICE Clinical Guideline CG192, Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance; WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide, Version 2.0 (2016); Federal Law No. 10 of 2019 on Mental Health (UAE)

Primary Care Emergencies

A 56-year-old man with hypertension walks into your community clinic with 40 minutes of central chest pressure and sweating. Blood pressure is 88/56, pulse 52 and regular, oxygen saturation 96% on air, and his chest is clear. The ECG shows 3 mm ST elevation in leads II, III and aVF, with ST depression in I and aVL. The nearest hospital with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is 35 minutes away by ambulance, and the nurse asks whether to give glyceryl trinitrate. What would you do?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing rapid management of an inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction in a clinic, recognising right ventricular involvement and avoiding harmful drugs.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is an acute inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction, and the hypotension with bradycardia suggests right ventricular involvement or a vagal response, both common with right coronary artery occlusion. Right ventricular infarction makes the patient preload-dependent, so nitrates and other vasodilators can cause profound hypotension. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred reperfusion if it can be delivered within 120 minutes of diagnosis, which is achievable here. Complications to anticipate include complete heart block, ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock. Aspirin reduces mortality and should be given at once unless allergic.

Management: I would call the ambulance immediately with a STEMI alert and send the ECG to the receiving cardiology team. I would not give glyceryl trinitrate because of the hypotension and likely right ventricular involvement. I would give aspirin 300 mg chewed, and leave the second antiplatelet and anticoagulant to the cardiology team unless they ask me to give them. I would record right-sided leads, looking for ST elevation in V4R. I would site an intravenous cannula, give a 250 mL saline bolus if the chest remains clear, and avoid oxygen unless saturation is below 90%. I would attach a defibrillator and have atropine available for symptomatic bradycardia. I would stay with him until the ambulance arrives, hand over in a structured way, and record times of symptom onset, ECG and treatment.

Ethics and communication: Consent is brief but should be real, explaining that this is a heart attack and that transfer is urgent. If he wants to drive himself or wait for family, I would explain the risk of death clearly and document his decision. Clinic governance includes regular checks of emergency drugs and defibrillators, and I would review any gaps afterwards.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why are nitrates dangerous in right ventricular infarction?
  • When would you give fibrinolysis in a primary care setting?
  • How do you manage complete heart block before the ambulance arrives?
  • What is the significance of ST depression in I and aVL?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Giving glyceryl trinitrate to a hypotensive inferior infarction
  • Delaying the ambulance to repeat the ECG or wait for troponin
  • Giving routine high-flow oxygen to a patient with normal saturation
  • Not attaching a defibrillator before transfer

Reference: Byrne RA et al, 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes (European Heart Journal, 2023); Resuscitation Council UK, Adult Advanced Life Support Guidelines (2021)

Ethics, Confidentiality and Consent

A 38-year-old man attends to discuss results from a pre-employment screen arranged through your clinic. His HIV test is positive on confirmatory testing, his CD4 count is 410 cells per microlitre and he has no symptoms. He is married, and his wife, who is also registered at your clinic, is 12 weeks pregnant. He asks you not to tell his wife or his employer, and says he will tell his wife himself when the time is right. How would you manage this situation?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing the balance between confidentiality, a third party at serious risk, and public health reporting duties, together with up-to-date HIV management.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: He has newly diagnosed HIV infection that needs antiretroviral therapy now, regardless of CD4 count. Early treatment improves his outcome and, once viral load is suppressed, prevents sexual transmission. His pregnant wife is at real risk, and if she is infected, treatment during pregnancy dramatically reduces transmission to the baby. HIV is a notifiable disease, so reporting to the public health authority is a legal duty that is separate from disclosure to family or employer. Baseline tests include viral load, resistance testing, hepatitis B and C, syphilis, tuberculosis screening and renal function.

Management: I would give the result in a private, unhurried consultation and check his understanding. I would refer him the same week to the HIV treatment service so that antiretroviral therapy can start promptly, ideally within seven days. I would notify the public health authority as required. I would explain that his wife's health and their baby's health depend on her being tested now, and offer him options: telling her himself with a time limit, telling her together with me, or provider-assisted notification. I would agree a short, specific timeframe and document it. If he still refused after repeated support, I would seek advice from the facility's ethics and legal team before any disclosure, and disclose only what is necessary to protect her. I would not share his result with his employer.

Ethics and communication: Confidentiality is protected under Federal Law No. 2 of 2019 on health data and is central to trust, but international ethical principles accept limited disclosure when a known person faces serious, avoidable harm. Notification under Federal Law No. 14 of 2014 is a separate legal duty. I would record each conversation, the options offered and the reasons for any decision.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • What would you do if his wife came to you next week for her antenatal visit?
  • What does undetectable equals untransmittable mean, and how would you explain it?
  • His employer calls asking for the result. How do you respond?
  • When does international ethical guidance allow disclosure without consent?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Telling his wife immediately without first supporting him to disclose
  • Accepting an open-ended promise to tell her later
  • Confusing statutory notification with disclosure to family or employer
  • Delaying antiretroviral therapy until the CD4 count falls

Reference: WHO Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Prevention, Testing, Treatment, Service Delivery and Monitoring (2021); WMA International Code of Medical Ethics (2022); Federal Law No. 14 of 2014 on the Prevention of Communicable Diseases (UAE)

Undifferentiated Symptoms and Red Flags

A 61-year-old man presents with three months of tiredness and breathlessness on climbing stairs. He takes ibuprofen most days for knee pain and omeprazole 20 mg. He has lost 5 kg without trying and has no change in bowel habit or visible bleeding. Haemoglobin is 94 g/L, MCV 71 fL, ferritin 6 micrograms/L, platelets 452 x 10^9/L and urine dipstick is negative for blood. He asks for iron tablets and says he does not want a camera test. How would you manage him?

What the panel is testing: The panel is testing recognition of iron deficiency anaemia in an older man as possible gastrointestinal cancer, and skilled counselling of a reluctant patient.

Show the answer outline

Knowledge: This is confirmed iron deficiency anaemia in a man over 60 with weight loss, and gastrointestinal malignancy must be excluded even though NSAID use offers another explanation. Colorectal cancer, especially right-sided, and gastric cancer often present this way without bleeding symptoms. Guidelines recommend bidirectional endoscopy for iron deficiency anaemia in men and postmenopausal women, together with coeliac serology. Other causes include NSAID ulceration, angiodysplasia, coeliac disease and, rarely, urinary tract loss. Unexplained weight loss adds to the urgency and supports a suspected cancer pathway.

Management: I would take a focused history, including family history of colorectal cancer, diet and dysphagia, and examine the abdomen and rectum. I would send coeliac serology, renal function and liver tests, and consider a faecal immunochemical test, which should not delay endoscopy. I would refer urgently for gastroscopy and colonoscopy on the suspected cancer pathway. I would start oral iron once daily, or on alternate days to improve absorption and tolerance, and check haemoglobin in two to four weeks. I would advise him to stop ibuprofen and use alternatives for his knee pain. I would warn him to return urgently with black stools, vomiting blood or worsening breathlessness. I would track the referral and see him with the results.

Ethics and communication: He has the right to decline, but his refusal is only valid if it is informed, so I would explain clearly that iron alone may hide a cancer that is treatable if found early. I would explore his fears, which are often about discomfort, sedation or the result itself, and offer sedation, CT colonography as an alternative, or time to discuss with family. If he still declines, I would document the discussion, keep the door open and arrange review.

Likely panel follow-up questions

  • Why is bidirectional endoscopy needed when he takes NSAIDs?
  • How would your approach differ in a 28-year-old menstruating woman?
  • When would you use intravenous iron?
  • What would you do if both endoscopies were normal?

Pitfalls in this case

  • Prescribing iron and repeating the blood count in three months
  • Attributing the anaemia to NSAIDs without investigation
  • Investigating only the upper gastrointestinal tract
  • Accepting refusal without making sure it is informed and documented

Reference: Snook J et al, British Society of Gastroenterology Guidelines for the Management of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Adults (Gut, 2021); NICE Guideline NG12, Suspected Cancer: Recognition and Referral

Common reasons candidates fail the Family Medicine oral

  • ✕Reassuring and reviewing in a month when the presentation needs same-day or urgent referral
  • ✕Treating iron deficiency anaemia with iron alone without looking for the cause
  • ✕Asking about mood but not asking directly about suicidal thoughts and plans
  • ✕Giving nitrates or delaying the ambulance in an inferior myocardial infarction with hypotension
  • ✕Breaking confidentiality to a family member without the patient's consent or a lawful basis
  • ✕Making a referral but not tracking that it happened or safety-netting the patient

Family Medicine oral syllabus

The clinical and professional areas the scenarios in this pack are drawn from:

  • Adolescent and Young Adult Health
  • Cardiometabolic and Chronic Disease Management
  • Child Health and Immunisation
  • Elderly Care and Polypharmacy
  • Ethics, Confidentiality and Consent
  • Infectious Disease and Antimicrobial Stewardship
  • Mental Health in Primary Care
  • Musculoskeletal and Sports Medicine
  • Preventive Medicine and Screening
  • Primary Care Emergencies
  • Professionalism, Patient Safety and Clinic Governance
  • Respiratory and Allergy
  • Undifferentiated Symptoms and Red Flags
  • Women's Health and Antenatal Care

Panels expect specialist-level command of the written Family Medicine blueprint too, which covers:

  • Principles of Family Medicine, Consultation Skills and Practice Management
  • Preventive Medicine, Screening, Health Promotion and Community Health
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders
  • Respiratory Medicine and Otolaryngology
  • Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
  • Musculoskeletal Medicine, Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
  • Women's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Mental Health and Behavioural Medicine
  • Dermatology
  • Acute and Emergency Care, Minor Surgery and Procedural Skills
  • Neurology, Ophthalmology, Renal-Urology, Haematology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care

Sitting the written exam as well? Family Medicine question bank or the free Family Medicine mock exam.

Last reviewed September 2026

About these questions: every scenario and model answer is original, written for this pack, with a guideline or trial reference. No recalled or leaked exam content is used. How we write our questions.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real Consultant Family Medicine - Oral Assessment exam questions?
No. Every item is original, researched by Neelim's exam research team against the exam blueprint published by the health authorities. Real, recalled or leaked exam content breaches the testing bodies' rules and can lead to a permanent exam ban - we do not sell it, and neither should anyone else.
How is the oral assessment actually run?
It varies by authority. DHA requires not less than five clinical scenarios across roughly 20-30 minutes with a minimum of two panellists, scored pass or fail. DOH Abu Dhabi runs 5-6 scenarios including an ethical case over 45-60 minutes on Microsoft Teams. SCFHS uses a structured consultant interview of two roughly 30-minute case-based sessions, and OMSB requires a viva for every candidate after the written exam. The pack briefs you on each.
Does this cover DHA, DOH, MOHAP and SCFHS?
The core clinical knowledge is shared across the GCC; what differs by regulator is the test vendor (Prometric for DHA, SCFHS, QCHP, NHRA, Kuwait MOH; Pearson VUE for DOH, OMSB), the format, the pass mark and the local-regulation slice. The pack briefs you on how each authority runs its panel.
How do I receive it?
As PDF files. Card checkout is being set up, so for now you request it from this page and we send it to you directly, usually the same day.

Still unsure whether you even need this exam?

Your route depends on your profession, your licence title and the authority. We have guided over 1,000 professionals through GCC licensing - tell us your situation and we will confirm exactly what you need to sit.